prevalent as well. At the U. S. Air Force Academywe have been using RP to enhance our design curriculum for the last three years. In thispaper we give a brief overview of RP technology, and discuss how we use both classical(non-rapid) and rapid prototyping in our design classes. Assessment results from bothfaculty and students are presented which provide insight into the role of RP inundergraduate education. This assessment shows that students have an initial reluctanceto using the RP technology. However, after they have used RP, they report that theprocess is surprisingly easy. In addition, they report that prototyping significantlyenhances their design and more importantly, enhances their learning of the design toolsand methodologies taught
means of educationaldelivery.Bibliography1. Benjamin, N.N., A. Johnson, M. Zidon, D. Moen, and D.K. Ludlow, “The Development of an Undergraduate Distance Learning Degree for Industry – A University/Industry Collaboration,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 3, (July 1998), pp. 277-282.2. Shute, N., “Open University,” PRISM, vol. 11, no. 3, (November 2001), pp. 18-25.3. Boulet, M-M., and S. Boudreault, “Using Technology to Deliver Distance Education in Computer Science,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 4, (October 1998), pp. 433-436.4. Gramoll, K., “An Internet Portal for Statics and Dynamics Engineering Courses,” ,” (Web) Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Engineering
Page 7.169.3 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationWhile many manufacturers provide motor parameters, it is important for students to perform teststo determine their accuracy. A ½ hp motor from Dynetic Systems Incorporated (MS3130-04/T-21/S) was tested in lab using the Magtrol DSP6001 (6000) Magtrol Controller and HD-715-6NHysteresis Brake (motor load) system. Students performed the appropriate tests and using aspreadsheet routine computed for La, Ra and kT. Comparing their results to parameters providedby the manufacturer, they soon discovered that while Ra and kT were relatively close
Session 2793 An Effective Engineer Design and Teambuilding Experience for Non-Engineers Robert J. Rabb, John S. Klegka United States Military AcademyAbstractPart of the balanced core curriculum of the United States Military Academy (USMA) requiresengineering education for all graduates to promote their ability to be creative problem solvers.This core curriculum provides a fundamental understanding of physical systems for allgraduates. Although all graduates receive a B.S. degree in various disciplines, many will majorin a non-engineering area
Session 1520 An Invariant Pattern-based Approach to Develop Concurrent Programs M. Mizuno 1, G. Singh 1, M.L. Neilsen 1, D.H. Lenhert 2, N. Zhang 3, and A.B. Gross4 1 Department of Computing and Information Sciences, Kansas State University (KSU) {masaaki,singh,neilsen}@cis.ksu.edu * 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, KSU, lenhert@ksu.edu * 3 Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, KSU, zhangn@ksu.edu * 4 The IDEA Center, 211 S. Seth Child Road, Manhattan, Kansas, agross@ksu.edu* Abstract In recent years, the
responsibilities. Very good Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and cooperative. Satisfactory Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative. Ordinary Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative. Marginal Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared. Deficient Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared. Unsatisfactory Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, unprepared. Superficial Practically no participation. No Show No participation at all. Additionally your contracting team has been awarded $5000 to use as bonus money. Distribute the bonus money amongst your team member s based on your view of
plays in team synthesis and productivity has yet to be analyzed. It is clear though thatthe Design (EPICS) program at CSM, as well as similar team-based curricula in other academicsettings, can benefit from more research on improving teamwork processes to enhance leadershipand management of the project and to encourage team interactions as the project progresses.Bibliography1. Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A. and Stewart-Belle, S., (1998) Exploring predictors of student team projectperformance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(1): 63-71.2. Larson, C. and LaFasto, F., (1989), Teamwork: What Must Go Right and What Can Go Wrong, Sage Publishers,London.3. Bass,4. Strong, J.T., and Anderson, R.E., (1990), Free-riding in group projects: Control
and options at hand. The point is not to setin concrete how to interpret a given text or how to analyze the ramifications of any design. Thepoint is to open a discussion about intention, about responsibility, and about the hazards ofabdicating the duty to imagine the consequences of one’s work.Bibliography1. Werhane, P.H. Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making. New York: Oxford University Press,1999.2. For a description of this course, see http://www.tcc.virginia.edu/thesis/thesis.html.3. Wright, S. "The X-Files Alphabet Book," http://www.thealph.com/alphabet/w.shtml, viewed 5 March 2001.4. Hughes, T. P. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns HopkinsUniversity Press, c1983.5. Carlson, W.B
© 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationcitation. Basically, these grading criteria enable the instructor to determine if the student read thequestion, visited the web site(s) or reference material, read the material, thought about it, andconstructed an appropriate response.Grading problems that ask students to complete an analysis or synthesis task also requires the useof subjective criteria. The instructor should determine if the submitted work dealt with theassigned project in a reasonable and complete way, if it has the correct format, and if it ispresented in an understandable style. Several of the modules recommend that the instructor givea list of these criteria to the students when he or she makes the assignment. The key is to
criteria basically enable the instructor to determine if the student read the question, visitedthe web site(s), read the material at the site, thought about it, and constructed an appropriateresponse.Grading problems that asked students to perform an analysis or synthesis task, for example, useone of the project management tools (e. g., a work breakdown structure) in planning a project,also requires the use of subjective criteria. The guide suggests that the instructor determine if thesubmitted work dealt with the assigned project in a reasonable and complete way, if it has thecorrect format, and if it is presented in an understandable style as summarized in the followingchecklist: • Responsive -- Does it deal with the assigned project
meaningful experience and becomeexposed to as many construction skills as possible. In addition to the Sea Perch project, DOE hasseveral outings and activities with the Ocean Engineering Dept.’s faculty, graduate students, andstaff, all to introduce both MIT and Ocean Engineering to the participants. Five upperclassstudents act as mentors to guide and advise the 30 new students in the various DOE activities andto serve as sources of information on life at MIT in general. DOE has been very well receivedby the students and their parents (who learn about the program from their sons and daughters)and the program has raised the profile of both the field and the Department in the minds ofstudents at MIT.In conclusion we have shown that a simple “toy
. Application of Bernoulli Equation (Flow from a Tap) Water flows as a jet from a tap as shown. By applying the Bernoulli Equation and noting that the pressure at the surface of the jet is at atmospheric pressure calculate the velocity of the jet and the jet diameter at 1, 2, 5, and 10 cm below the tap outlet. The velocity of the jet at tap outlet is 0.3 m/s. Density of water is 1000 kg/m 3 Do=1 cm 0.3 m/s Start by following the procedure below Part 1 (i) Sketch the water jet (ii) Identify a control volume for each of the conditions to be calculated (iii) Apply Bernoulli Equation and
] 4U. S. History [GE] 3Literature [GE] 3THIRD SEMESTERIT 212 How Computers Work 3IT 214 Data Base Fundamentals 3MATH 125 Discrete Mathematics 3Natural Science w. Lab [GE] 4Social/Behavioral Science Elective [GE] 3FOURTH SEMESTERIT 213 Multimedia and Computer Graphics
which the first author is the principal investigator.This financial support by the NSF is gratefully acknowledged. In addition, the collaborative effortsof Dr. M. Prasad and Dr. M. Tsatsanis who are co-investigators for the NSF project areappreciated. Furthermore, it should not go unmentioned that the implementation of this laboratoryapproach into the system dynamics laboratory would not have been possible without the vastdesign and manufacturing expertise of Mr. Jan Nazalewicz and his colleagues in the StevensDepartment of Engineering Services.Bibliography1. Knight, C. D. & DeWeerth, S. P. (1996). A shared remote testing environment for engineering education. Proceedings of theASEE 1996 Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Session 8c1
Analysis Course", 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, Session 12C6 – Virtual Labs, American Society of Engineering Education, November 1999.5. Marino, P., J. Nogueira, H. Hernandez, "Electronics Laboratory Practices Based on Virtual Instrumentation", 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, Session 12C6 – Virtual Labs, American Society of Engineering Education, November 1999.6. Libii, Josue Njock, Sunday O. Faseyitan, “Data Acquisition Systems in the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory: Draining of a Tank”, 1997 Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society of Engineering Education, Milwaukee, WI, June, 1997.7. Carlson, Lawrence E., Lee D. Peterson, Walter S. Lund, Trudy L. Schwartz, “Facilitating Interdisciplinary Hands-on
andSurveying (NCEES) prepares the FE and Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE)examinations. NCEES is working with academia to encourage the use of the FEexamination to help engineering programs satisfy the student outcomes assessmentrequired by the new EAC of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000). Could the FEexamination also be successfully employed as an outcomes assessment tool for TAC ofABET programs? What impact could an increase in engineering graduates taking andpresumably passing the FE examination have on the career potential of engineeringtechnology graduates? This paper explores these and other issues related to outcomesassessment using the FE examination emphasizing Electrical/Electronic(s) andMechanical Engineering Technology
Copyright © 2001, American Society of Engineering Education7. Jones, C. V., "Visualization and Optimization," ORSA Journal of Computing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1994, pp. 221-257.8. Eddy, W. F. and Mockus, A., "Dynamic Visualization in Modeling and Optimization of Ill-Defined Problems: Case Studies and Generalizations," Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.9. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P. and Newell, A., The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.10. Sturman, D. J., Zeltzer, D. and Pieper, S., "Hands-on Interaction with Virtual Environments," Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1989, pp. 19
acknowledge the financial support in part from the National Science Foundation, Grant No.EEC-9872505.References[1] http://www.internet2.edu/, October 2000[2] Nick Stam, “Computing”, PC Magazine, August 7, 2000[3] John S. Mccright, “Cisco’s Chambers: e-learning will help us control our destinies”, PC Week Online, http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/, Nov. 16, 1999[4] Gun-Dong F. Pahng, Nicola Senin, David Wallace, “Modeling and Evaluation of Product Design Problems in a Distributed Design Environment”, 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 14- 17, 1997, Sacramento, California[5] Michael P Case and Stephen C-Y Lu, “Discourse Model for Collaborative Design”, Computer-Aided Design, Vol
figure 4.1.1.The ferromagnetic plunger is attached to the object of which the displacement is to bemeasured. The mutual inductance between the primary and secondary coils varies with theplunger’s position. The analysis of the equivalent circuit model shows that for a highimpedance load the transfer function is given as, eout = s( M 2 − M1 )i1 Proceedings fo the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.41.5 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationwhere M2 - M1 is the differential mutual inductance between the
authors believe thisdemonstration can be extended for use in many different chemical engineering departments, andrecognize further assessment of the student’s improved knowledge of heat transfer and modelingshould be implemented in future use of this demonstration.References[1] S. Farrell, R. P. Hesketh, J. A. Newell, C. S. Slater, Int. J. Eng. Educ 17 (2001) 588-592.[2] D. Waechter-Brulla, M. Woller, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 24 (2000) 327-333.[3] J. P. Holman, Heat transfer. 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, 1997 p xxviii, 696 p.[4] D. D. Joye, M. A. Smith, Heat Transf. Eng. 21 (2000) 47-54
different kinds of evidence are convincing todifferent people. Engineers like tables and graphs, but scholars in other disciplines respond tomore qualitative data. Finally, institutional transformation requires changes to policies, practices,norms, and culture – and faculty norms and culture are very difficult to change.References1. Long, J.S., From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. 2001, Washington DC: National Academies Press.2. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2006, National Research Council: Washington.3. Burrelli, J., Thirty-three Years of Women in S&E Faculty Positions, Directorate for
package(s) to fulfill specific body of knowledge (BOK) for the ConE education?METHODOLOGYIn this research study, two widely used BIM software packages, namely Autodesk Revit family2010 and Vico Virtual Construction Suite 2008, were selected and their capacities andlimitations were examined by the authors. As a case study, these two packages were used to Page 22.818.4model a two-story academic building. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are provided.BIM SolutionsAs BIM technology continues to evolve, software vendors have been developing solutions to fillthe BIM matrix. A brief introduction of the most developed BIM solutions
. Page 22.852.4 Figure 3 : DAQmx VIs in LabVIEW Figure 4 : NI ELVISmx Express VIs in LabVIEW The specifications of NI myDAQ are designed to allow sampling and generation ofanalog signals through the audio range of frequencies. Digital lines are configurable as eitheroutput or inputs, and one line is reserved as a counter for pulse train input/output . Fixed powersupplies allow students to power sensors or IC’s on a breadboard. The total power available isgoverned by the USB bus and is limited to 500mW. The analog outputs may be used as a Specifications: • Analog Input • 2 channels, 200kS/s, 16
EWB chapter. Page 22.957.9Bibliography1. National Academy of Engineering. 2008. Grand Challenges of Engineering. Obtained from http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/?ID=115742. ABET. 2009. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Obtained from http://www.abet.org/Linked/Documents-UPDATE/Criteria and PP/E001 10-11 EAC Criteria 1-27-10.pdf3. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.4. Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin, E.F. Lambin, T.M. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C.A. deWit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H
scientists and engineers made me see that I want to be a scientists or engineer when I grow up.” “My sister did a science fair project before the scientists and engineers came to the help. I remember she struggled with her project. It was great having the scientists come and help out. It made the process easier.” “I looked forward to the people from SPAWAR coming to help.” Page 22.1161.8From teachers: “The S&Es from the lab provide such good role models for the students. Many have never met a scientist or engineer.” “The scientists have been a great help at listening to what we needed. The project
Education and Practice, Vol 134. April 2008.6. Rajan, S., It’s About Time: The Competitive Advantage of Quick Response Manufacturing, New York, CRC Press, 2010.7. Personal Interviews with George Brown, Dan Turner, and Anita Konopa, Emergency Services Coordinators, [Local] Office of Emergency Services, Feb. 2008 and Nov. 2009.8. "Disaster Preparedness Program." City of [Local] Fire Department, available at http://www.[Local]city.org/fire/preparation.asp.9. Cooper, Robin, and Regine Slagmulder. Supply Chain Development for the Lean Enterprise : Interorganizational Cost Management, Productivity Press, 1999.10. Personal interview with Elizabeth Merson, [Local] American Red Cross. Oct. 2009.11. Personal interview
State.References[1] T.A. Litzinger, P.N. Van Meter, C.M. Firetto, L.J. Passmore, C.B. Masters, S.R. Turns, G.L. Gray, F. Costanzo,S.E. Zappe (2010) A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 99, No.4, pp. 337-354.[2] T.A. Litzinger, P.N. Van Meter, N. Kapli, S.E. Zappe, and R. Toto (2010) Translating education research intopractice within an engineering education center: Two examples related to problem solving, International Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp 860-868.[3] Atkinson, R., Derry, S., Renkl, A., Wortham, D., Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from theWorked Example Research Summer 2000, Vol 70, No. 2. Pp. 181-214[4] Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated
need tostudy and that attendance in the study group is worthwhile.Study Group LogisticsStudents arrive at study groups to find that the leader has organized the seating in the room to bein a horseshoe shape with all chairs and desks facing the white board. The leader should beseated as if s/he is a part of the group. The leader facilitates collaborative group work byopening communication and asking about problem areas from the lecture or homework. In thecase of a large group or a group with students from several different course sections studyingdifferent chapters of the book, the leader will help break the group into smaller more appropriategroups. The leader projects equality with the group through body language alone, such as bysitting
Engineering Education, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 59–61. 2. Hawkins, S., M. Coney, and K. Bystrom, “Incidental Writing in the Engineering Classroom,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 1, 1996, pp. 27–33. 3. Hendricks, R., and E. Pappas, 1996. “Advanced Engineering Communication: An Integrated Writing and Communication Program for Materials Engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 4, pp.343–352. 4. Sharp, J., J. Harb, and R. Terry, 1997. “Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 93–101. 5. Waitz, I., and E. Barrett, 1997. “Integrated Teaching of Experimental and Communication Skills to
Assessment”, Proceedings of the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,October 12-15, 2011, Rapid City, SD.[6] Peat, M., Taylor, C. E., and Franklin, S., “Re-engineering of Undergraduate Science Curricula toEmphasize Development of Lifelong Learning Skills”, Innovations in Education and TeachingInternational, Vol.42, No.2, May 2005, pp: 135-146[7] Richards, L. G., and Ribando, R. J., “Work in Progress – Distance Learning: The Path To LifelongEducation”, 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 20-23, 2004, Savannah, GA[8] Lenschow, R. H., “From Teaching to Learning: A Paradigm Shift in Engineering Education andLifelong Learning”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.23, No. 2, 1998 [9] www.Facebook.com January