and decisions impact (Meiksins, 1988; Rulifson, 2019).Further, the organizational structure and culture of an entity may not support thisobligation, if the collective assumptions, beliefs, and values are inconsistent withengineering ethics.Engineering graduates must be better prepared to negotiate this complex organizationallandscape while supporting sustainable development, as their responsibility to the publicdemands it. Sustainability encompasses technical feasibility supported by economic,environmental, and safety objectives, regulations, and risk management. “Sustainabledevelopment ... meets the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needs,” Brundtland Commission (Andrews, 2009, p
focused on creating stronger partnerships between faculty and staff at a 2 yearand 4 year institution supporting engineering transfer students found that faculty and mentors played amajor influence on students’ decision to choose an engineering major [25]. Students also reported on thechallenges that they faced finding detailed and locally relevant information on engineering careerpathways outside the classroom environment and several of them were struggling with issues related toengineering identity development and sense of belonging. Furthermore, students articulated that whatdrew them to engineering was their desire to develop their quantitative and critical thinking skills, andtheir love of innovation and design, all of which are closely
principles and practices of sustainable engineering and design only entered the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology curriculum piecemeal. The HERE program was developed as aliving-learning community to immerse students in an environment of learning about the economic,social, and environmental impacts (the triple bottom line) of their lives and work. By setting thisfoundation of sustainability early in their academic career, students will be better suited to considerthe triple bottom line when developing design solutions for complex challenges they will face asscientists and engineers, not to mention as citizens and consumers.The academic part of the HERE program consists of three complementary courses that meetgraduation requirements for most
into two courses in the civil engineering technology program at the higher educationinstitution and explore the students’ understanding of sustainability-related content and measuretheir engagement with the material and confidence in carrying out the EOP learning outcomesthat aligned with respective courses. The goal is to increase students’ interest in sustainabilityprinciples and concepts and encourage other faculty to adopt the EOP framework for theircourses.BackgroundThe integration of sustainability principles, practices, and values is critical for engineeringeducation. Civil engineers, in particular, should demonstrate an understanding of sustainability toprepare them to address global challenges, promote ethical practices, meet industry
Engineering, English,Communication, Rhetoric, Theatre, Visual Art and Design, Science and Technology Studies, andEngineering Education. Our teaching responsibilities run the gamut of transdisciplinaryinstruction, including communication, science and society, professionalism, team skills,leadership and ethics, and responsibilities as an artist-in-residence, with instruction andsupervision at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Our research interests reflect theseactivities and our career stages span from graduate school to near retirement. We are united by acommon interest in how engineering students develop mindsets that enable effective humanisticpractice, and we share common values in supporting our students’ development of
that whilecollaborating on the educational process these potential issues should be explored in an opendialogue between faculty and practitioners. Those involved in the educational collaborationshould also keep in mind that a faculty member is as likely as an industry practitioner to harbor Page 15.1227.3bias that can influence the process.Accreditation ConsiderationsAccreditation guides the minimum standards for educational objectives in post-secondaryconstruction education programs. Educational outcomes from construction programs thatinfluence career and professional accomplishments, as well as specific skills, knowledge, andbehaviors, are
systems. As a tenure-track faculty member and Chair of the University of Detroit Mercy Mechanical Engineering department, he has developed a program of instruction that promotes student-lead design of assistive technology products for people with disabilities. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to experience interaction with real live ”customers.” Dr. Kleinke is currently the Director of the Graduate Engineering Professional Programs, emphasizing Systems Engineering and Graduate Product Development programs. In addition to academic work, Dr Kleinke continues his involvement in industry as he conducts seminars on innovation which are
it is timeconsuming and difficult to implement well. A major hurdle in implementing project-basedlearning environments is that they require simultaneous changes in curriculum, instruction, andassessment—all of which are daunting to faculty members. 12 These barriers to implementingPBL become magnified as student enrollment climbs and certain modes of instruction andassessment become unsustainable at larger scales.Starting in 2012, the introductory mechanics sequence at UIUC has been the focus of a concertedredesign effort. 13,14 This redesign was carried out by a group of faculty working together as amutually supportive Community of Practice 15,16 with support from both a college-level program 17and an NSF program 18 . Key goals of the
-related mentorship opportunities for Black,Hispanic, and Indigenous K-12, undergraduate, and graduate-level students in the state ofIllinois.One of the premier programs of the IDEA Institute is the GIANT Program, which is a seed grantprogram that provides an opportunity for Institute members to research DEI issues they arepassionate about in a way that is otherwise not possible. The GIANT program is modeled afterthe Strategic Instructional Innovations Program (SIIP) for faculty-led teaching initiatives [7] butis modified to focus on DEI topics and allows students, postdocs, and staff to propose and leadprojects. Central to the GIANT program is: (i) proposing evidence-based strategies fostering DEIin STEM, (ii) conducting research and collecting
each community to develop inalignment with their own goals and the individuals that will be participating. Additionally, weencourage early career faculty members to be creative in how they think about mentoring duringthe early stages of their career, as it is unlikely to find a single person at their institution who canprovide them with all of the support they will need.7. AcknowledgementThis work was supported by NSF RFE Award #1663909, 1664217, 1664038, 1664016, 1664008,1738262.ReferencesCambridge, D., Kaplan, S., & Suter, V. (2005). Community of practice design guide: A step-by-step guide for designing and cultivating communities of practice in higher education.Cole, D., & Griffin, K. A. (2013). Advancing the study of student
Paper ID #8628Machining Experience in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past thirteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez in the
project topics lead somestudents to explore optical properties in detail, while others focused on thermal properties, theinfluence of specific deteriorative environments, etc.Incorporating sociotechnical thinking further contextualized the real-world nature of the project,helping to emphasize to students that design decisions have broad consequences and reinforcethe need to consider both social and technical factors in engineering practice. The introduction ofa design project in the sophomore or junior year, and teaching of a selection tool like EduPack,additionally helped to prepare students for their capstone design experiences. These outcomeswere achieved while still covering the basic materials science content common to an introductorycourse
students to achieve maximum successes in their careers or research disciplines.Background technologies and the anticipated future of the fieldGeospatial Technologies (GTs) have evolved from initial beginnings as simple computer-basedmap making tools to complex visual and computational environments. GTs are used world-wide in diverse application domains ranging from community planning to the exploration ofouter space. The increased use of GTs has led the development of new tools, techniques andtheory that have imbued GTs with new forms of geographic visualization, support for spatialthinking, and opportunities for research and education. It is an exciting time for GT researchand education. Industry standard, commercial desktop Geographic
settings. While the tension apparently affected some students negatively,most members still had an overall positive experience.EE693, UAS Systems Design.Fall 2016. The following are student responses from a recent (fall 2016) offering of this course.The makeup of this course consisted of graduate and undergraduate students from electrical,mechanical, computer engineering/science, and geomatics from 2 geographically separatedcampus locations, communicating on a daily basis via videolink and electronic media. Note thatthese students, almost universally, had a positive experience with the course.1. Comments on course difficulty: • Most of the HWs were easy to do. But some questions were really hard to answer as they were conceptual questions
some cases, they were personally impacted by them. For example,one student hadn’t previously considered engineering as related to social justice. She wasn’tinterested in pursuing a career in the technical-focused engineering field, but after seeing theconnections between engineering and social justice, she had a change of heart and wasreconsidering that decision: I also learned that engineering can involve social justice issues as well. Before, I did not think I would end up pursuing any sort of career in engineering because I never enjoyed the technical aspects of what was previously required. Once introduced to our project, I was intrigued to not only address modern sustainable food systems through methods
, independent studies,thesis–based research and individual projects.11,12Many of the projects undertaken by the HESE program are multi-year, cross-discipline projectsthat entail the aid of people outside the engineering department (i.e. business school, law school,etc.) The projects are also vertically integrated to include students spanning the academic rungsfrom freshman to doctoral candidates. Each project includes a faculty lead, but it is mainlymanaged by students as the faculty act as the long-term point of contact for the communities.At Purdue University, a multi-disciplinary engineering design program (EPICS) has beenoperating for almost 20 years. Coyle et al. have provided an assessment of the program fromboth the student and the community
began working as Co-PI on another NSF-funded study to reduce barriers in the hiring of underrepresented racial minority faculty in data science and data engineering fields.Dr. Tammy Michelle McCoy, Georgia Institute of Technology Tammy M. McCoy is the TA Development and Future Faculty Specialist for the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In this capacity, she works closely with graduate students and postdoctoral scholars interested in pursuing careers in college teaching through teaching assistant (TA) training and support, academic career development programs, and training and certification in college teaching. Specifically, she teaches courses and facilitates workshops to
AC 2011-1256: DEVELOPING THE GLOBAL BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERTHROUGH A 12-MONTH INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHEXPERIENCE IN THE U.S. AND CHINABarbara Burks Fasse, Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is an educational psychologist and senior research scientist in the Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech. Dr. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives– specifically Problem-Based and Project-Based Inquiry Learning– in classrooms, in- structional labs, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007 following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Computing where she was a member of the NSF-funded Learning By Design
strategy consists of students completing an online module outsideof class, participating in online or in-class discussions, and completing an activity or assignmentrelated to the module content. Each element of this integration approach provides students aplatform and experiences to build knowledge and competencies resulting in increasing levels oflearning at each step. The integration of these e-learning modules into courses first took place inspring 2015, and since then 14 modules have been fully integrated. Four new modules will bedeployed in fall 2019, which will complete the integration of all eighteen modules. Our focusgroup of spring 2018 graduates in this study completed 4-11 e-learning modules (see Appendix 2),since the integration of the
difficulty in ordering parts from many vendors limited the scope of some projects that studentscould pursue.For obvious reasons, the final IoT Project showcase could not be held in person during thetransitional semester or the following pandemic semester. Students used a template to createcustom websites during these semesters and used videos to demonstrate their projects. These wereposted online for students, faculty, family, and friends to view athttp://yellowstone.ece.umn.edu/~orser/EE1301_Fal2020_Showcase/ andhttp://yellowstone.ece.umn.edu/~orser/EE1301_Spr2020_Showcase/ . While exciting at the time,these alternatives did not measure up to an in-person show. Since the showcase was held on thelast day of class, it occurred after the student
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Integrating Sustainability in Higher Education: Curricular Review and Opportunities for Future DevelopmentAbstractRose-Hulman Institute of Technology (RHIT) is renowned for its commitment to providing thefinest undergraduate education in science, engineering, and mathematics. With a missiondedicated to support students in an individualized learning experience, RHIT strives to be aglobal leader of engineering and science education. In line with its vision, the institution aims toproduce graduates who are not only inspired and prepared for success but also equipped toaddress the complex challenges facing our global society. We have comprehensively exploredRHIT's sustainability
Participants watched a 7.5-minute QUAL video, which highlighted several examples of HC involving a marginalized Latino student and faculty member. Participants then defined HC in their own words and provided personal examples of engineering HC. (4) Emotions Participants selected an emotion QUAN & QUAL they felt corresponded to six HC statements and whether their emotion was
Brookfield puts it, “think[ing] deeply about whatwe do and how best to introduce students to complex new knowledge or skillsets.”8 This guideis intended to help faculty members overcome concerns and potential difficulties cited in theliterature, including “workload for faculty, student resistance, lack of opportunities for just-in-time questions, technical issues, decreased interest and neglected material” (see p. 7 in Ref. 5).This paper will address strategies for making the most of these benefits and for overcoming thesechallenges.Julie – My decision to flip was based on a disconnect between my reality and my vision for myMEB class. Students tended to sit passively in my lectures (sometimes) taking notes, but Iwanted (and tried) to engage them in
, and educators have advocated moving from educating engineers in a waythat reinforces that engineering is a purely technical endeavor to one that recognizes that it issociotechnical, and happens in a global context. As part of a National Science Foundation -funded project, our engineering program is exploring ways for engineering educators to do thiswithin required engineering courses. In this paper, we present an example of how content relatedto sociotechnical and global context was integrated into a required senior-level Heat Transfercourse in mechanical engineering. We describe the design of the Social Relevance and GlobalContext Module and its use with students in Fall 2017. The module is designed for use in theHeat Exchanger section of
engineers capable of solving the grand challenges this new century brings.Reviewing the LiteratureStudent engagement theory pioneer Alexander Astin hypothesized that the more involved astudent is socially and academically in college, the more he or she will learn due to increases inmotivation and interaction with faculty, fellow students, and other campus activities. 4,5,6Unfortunately Astin found that choosing an engineering major had “negative effects on a varietyof satisfaction outcomes: faculty, quality of instruction, Student Life, opportunities to takeinterdisciplinary courses, … the overall college experience, … writing skills, listening skills,[and] Cultural Awareness.”6 He did find that engineering majors reported the highest growth
their writing decisions pushes students to think critically about how they approached theassignment and can deepen their engagement and understanding of their writing process.Example 3: Scaffolding the processes of writing a literature reviewOur third example describes how atmospheric sciences faculty member Nicole Riemer taughtwriting for the first time. When she began working with our project team, Dr. Riemer had been afaculty member for over ten years but had not explicitly taught writing in her courses. She didnot have any training in the teaching of writing prior to enrolling in Writing Across Engineering.After completing the workshop series, she requested and received mentoring for an advancedgraduate course in atmospheric sciences
-to-PeerRottman and Reeve reference the use of curricular integration strategies to introduce ethics andequity to students. Faculty members offer an invitation for instructors to incorporate case studiesor co-construct classes that allow for modules to present ways in which these ideas are exploredand demonstrated in real world contexts.Accessibility: Students with disabilitiesAt Carnegie Mellon, course materials are adjusted for file format and font to make it easier forstudents with visual disabilities to view. [19].Only a few articles outlined concrete steps for implementation. A few touch on professorsorienting students to understand equity in engineering through the Liberal social justice theory.“Liberal social justice theory frames
sharing experiences,knowledge and insight (Crawford, 1998; DeLisle, 2000; Illinois Leadership; Petcher, 1997). AsCrawford (1998) states: We are now recognizing that leadership can and does occur at all levels of organizations and in all kinds of settings. Leadership is increasingly being recognized as an interactive process that takes place between members of an organization. It is not simply a skill employed by a person in a position of power within an organization. (p. 2)Therefore, it is important that engineering students are presented with opportunities to developleadership skills that will allow them to successfully work collaboratively with other people tochange organizations, lead and/or participate in
redesigned course (n=53,taught in Fall 2016).Course and instructional materialsThe purpose of this course is to help students learn about the process of becoming a chemical orbiological engineer, the scope of careers open to chemical or biological engineering graduates,and to introduce students to engineering design practices, laboratory safety, and professionalethics.Original course. The original course included guest speaker presentations, one laboratory sessionpaired with a redesign assignment, and a culminating design challenge. Presentations typicallyincluded a research-active faculty member presenting his or her research, though there were alsovisits from student organizations and advisors.In the laboratory, students filled out a worksheet
Although this case appears on numerouswebsites, the Murdough Center site offers, in addition to a well-written case, various shortresponses and survey results about the case.Healy cautions against designing a “thin” case, one that omits needed information or “assumestoo much.” Such cases may be “short, easily posed, and attention-getting. . . .” While some thincases may be dramatic and attract student interest, they are atypical of what graduates can expectin daily life. Thin cases do not deal with issues stemming from “partiality,” a typical human traitin ordinary life where someone is partial to one or more persons. Thin cases also usually dealwith win-lose decisions. This type of decision does not prepare students for trying to findwinning