Conference Session

Statistics in the CHE Curriculum

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Valerie Young

homework assignment. The following question was asked on the graded in-class project in week 10. It has been suggested that erosion yield can be predicted from polymer density using an equation of the form: (erosion yield) = a + b × (density) + c × (density)2 Find values for the constants a, b, and c. Evaluate the quality of this model. Most (> 90 %) of students identified least squares multiple linear regression as an appropriatetechnique, and thus correctly determined the values of a, b, and c from the data given. However,just under 50 % of the students effectively used at least two of the four recommended techniquesto evaluate model quality.Fundamentals of statistical process analysis and control were introduced midway through

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

M.J. (John) Frye; Myron (Ron) Britton

with insight into their own strengths and weaknesses, theexercise provides students with the opportunity to practice “giving” and “receiving” feedback.(See Appendix A, Part B and C)End-of-term self and team assessments are submitted to the professor. In addition to theassessments, each team member is required to distribute “bonus cheques” to each of the otherteam members. (See Appendix A) A team of six members distributes $3300 among the otherteam members. A team of five members works with $2700, a team of four with $2200, and ateam of three with $1700. Each student must provide a detailed explanation/justification for thebonuses that are assigned. The team contribution mark obtained by each student is based on thetotal value of the “bonus

Conference Session

What Are We Learning About Co-op and Experiential Education Experience?

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

academic knowledge and skills are being integrated into the daily experience in a manner that will result in the attainment of critical management abilities such as decision-making, time management, and scheduling. b) The Supervisor who will provide guidance and support while at the hosting firm. Page 25.93.13 c) The Internship Coordinator who will assist in maintaining a high quality, productive experience for both the intern and the hosting firm. Table 3 - Supervisor Evaluation of Intern

Conference Session

CoED General Technical Session II

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert P. Brazile, University of North Texas; Kathleen Swigger, University of North Texas; Matt Ray Hoyt, University of North Texas; Brian Lee, University of North Texas; Brandon Nelson, University of North Texas

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Bouillon and J. Krinke, “A Platform For Teaching Distributed Software Engineering,” 2004.[2] H. K. Edwards, “Analysis of the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Teams in Software Engineering Projects,” in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (January 06-09, 2003). HICSS. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.[3] L. J. Burnell, J. W. Priest, and J. B. Durrett, “Teaching distributed multidisciplinary software development,” IEEE Software, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 86- 93, Oct. 2002.[4] J. Favela and F. Pena-Mora, “An experience in collaborative software engineering education,” IEEE Software, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 47-53, Apr. 2001.[5] M. Guzdial, P. Ludovice, M. Realff, T. Morley, and K

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Vic Cundy; Don Rabern; David Gibson

(continued) Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.53.4 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering EducationTable I. Conversion algorithms for MSU Engineering workload model (continued).Laboratory Coordination Lab Coordinator/Supervisor 0.5 credits/yearAdvising UG Advisees 1 credit/16.25 students per year Plan A (thesis) graduate Students 0.6 credit per student per year Plan B (non-thesis) grad. Students

Collection

1998 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert (Bob) M. Anderson

faculty among the discussion group had no need for the software to be able toevaluate mathematical functions and these non-engineering faculty also had a high need forcomputer-based student discussion groups. In the end, I decided on Mallard™ unilaterally.1-b. I was frustrated by the political struggle over who would control my server. This struggledelayed bringing my server on-line until about week 6 of the fall 1997 semester.1-c. I was initially frustrated at how hard it was for me and my undergraduate student helpers tocreate PERFECT problems. We sometimes made silly mistakes. We sometimes madeunthinking assumptions based on our greater experience that beginning students could not make

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 3 - Diversity

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Rosene Conover Kimmel, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Maya Sri Miriyala, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Hanwen Liang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Megha Agrawal, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kaitlyn Tuvilleja, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

] B. Altay, “User-centered design through learner-centered instruction,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–155, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827646.[10] J. H. L. Koh, C. S. Chai, B. Wong, and H.-Y. Hong, “Design Thinking and Education,” in Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning, J. H. L. Koh, C. S. Chai, B. Wong, and H.-Y. Hong, Eds., Singapore: Springer, 2015, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1.[11] T. Berg, “Teaching Your Students to Bounce Back from Failure,” Harvard Business Publishing. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/teaching-your-students-to-bounce-back-from- failure[12] S. A. Kidd

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Rowland, Dept. of Civil & Mechanical Engineerint at United States Military Academy; Andrew Bellocchio, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

methodology in Appendix A yields the analytical tool shown inAppendix B allowing students to make design decisions there are many other things that can bedone to optimize one’s glider. Some good advice comes from the article “Design of Balsa WoodGliders: A lesson in the engineering process”3 and helps students understand and make the mostof the project they are required to complete. For example the article discusses qualitativeconstruction techniques as well as testing methods and modifications that can be made once theaircraft is flown. Additionally, because the gliders are launched by hand there is something to besaid for proper throwing technique. The gliders are designed to fly at speeds ranging fromapproximately 15-20 fps. Thus, if students find

Conference Session

Computational Tools

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joel Esposito, U.S. Naval Academy; Carl E. Wick, U.S. Naval Academy; Kenneth A. Knowles, U.S. Naval Academy

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

interface.Section 6 concludes with the results from a usability survey we conducted from a test group ofover 40 users. Appendix A provides installation instructions and compatibility information.Appendix B contains a Quick Reference of the toolbox’s functions.2. Reverse Engineering the Intelitek Dynamic Link Library Upon inspection we determinedthat the ScorBase Software provided with the Scorbot simply calls an Intelitek proprietary andundocumented dynamic link library (DLL) to communicate with the Scorbot’s Control Box.Although a complete picture of the routines encapsulated in this DLL is not known outside of themanufacturer, there are web sites that share some incomplete knowledge about the DLL routines[8]. In addition, these primitive routines are

Conference Session

Track 1 - Session 2 - Student Development

Collection

2012 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Jennifer DeBoer, SPEED

Tagged Topics

Track 1 - Student Development

engineers.policymakers, they do not emerge from the student perspective. B. Curriculum: theory vs. practiceA. Prototypical models In the curriculum, balance must be struck between theory National policymakers create, support, and view and practice. Engineering as a discipline struggles to find theengineering training institutions for different purposes. In ideal mixture of theoretical training, practical experience, andvarying geographic regions, cultures, resources, and practices; the essential but even more challenging classes that combinedifferent colonial histories, national allies, and populations; and

Conference Session

Student Learning and Research

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Macy Reynolds

buthad trouble with traditional assessments in school. “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Student BStudent B provides another example of a student with a borderline learning problem. Thisstudent was not a star in the mechanical engineering technology classes, receiving C’s in bothFluid Dynamics and Metrology. However in the Senior Project course this individual becamethe team leader and was responsible for keeping everyone on schedule, communicating with theteam, dealing with the customer, and producing the final product. This student handled all thetasks far better than expected and was a

Conference Session

Learning and Assessment in ME

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott L. Post, Bradley University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

given application 6) Use modern engineering tools (MATLAB) to compute simulation of transient fluids problemsOther course objectives include: 7) Communicate effectively to produce professionally-quality technical reports a. Free from spelling & grammar errors and typos b. Professionally formatted with clear and consise communication c. Figures & Tables are used to convey information effectively 8) Design and Conduct Experiments, and Analyze and Interpret Data a. Attend all labs b. Complete all necessary measurements c. Complete all analysis of data (as shown in Lab Reports) 9) Be a valuable member of a team that successfully completes a group project. This

Collection

2013 GSW

Authors

L. Massa; P. Jha

of any, the only detailed solution would be μi = 0 ∀i,which violates conservation of mass, thus it is discarded.Stoichiometry constraints on equation (1) are typically expressed in terms of the stoichiometricmatrix An b A dn 0, (2)where the matrix A is of size nelement × nspecies, and expresses the number of each atomic elementin each species molecule. Therefore, the product An counts the total number of elements in thesystems, which is set to a constant by imposing equation (2). The evaluation of A can beimplemented in MATLAB in terms of the array of strings for the species and elements, asdemonstrated in the code fragment reported in Fig. 1.elements={’c’,’h

Collection

2009 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Kevin Dahm; Thomas Merrill; William Riddell

gave a final presentation and submitted a final report. The full grading rubrics forthese assignments are given in Appendices B and C. Specifications included that the reportshould be a comprehensive description of the project, with detailed calculations supporting allquantitative results. Presentations by contrast would be no more than 10 minutes long and wouldfocus on the team’s most convincing evidence that the proposed product was feasible, had amarket and was worth funding for further development. Thus, the project provided a realisticexample of the roles of these two different forms of communication. The entrepreneurial projectalso offered an advantage over many previous SEC II design projects in that each presentationcovered a unique

Conference Session

Problem Solving and Communication in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

NFigure 1. Communication with different audiences. a) Percent of total respondents indicating that theycommunicated with identified audiences and b) the frequency with which positive respondents (those who spoke withspecific audiences) communicated with these audiences.Students communicated most with engineers (in discipline (80%), out of discipline (72%)), non-engineers (with technical degree (74%), without technical degree (59%)), managers in engineering(69%) and external employees (contractors, suppliers, etc.) (57%). Of these, students had mostfrequent interactions with in-discipline engineers, with nearly 90% of students indicating veryfrequent (2-3 times per day) or frequent (1-2 times per day) interactions. Interestingly, 46 of the77

Conference Session

Improving Student Problem Solving and Performance

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

have made use of the “lightly-flexible” deadline policy, we observe that students who earn C, D, and F grades in these threecourses make use of the policy on average two to three times more often than those earning Aand B grades. Further, a higher proportion of students with A grades never make use of thepolicy at all. The data also reveals differences between class levels: in our junior-level course, anaverage of 0.5 slight extensions per student have been granted, versus on average 1.0 extensionsper student among the sophomores and 3.0 extensions per student among the first-years.BackgroundThe University of Delaware is a medium-sized public institution whose chemical engineeringprogram graduates on average 80 undergraduates per year. The

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Anthony J.A. Oxtoby; Adam G. Sanderson

value at one time. When conducting an IDMA read cycle to transfer data to the 80C552, the process described above is reversed. During the first 80C552 external bus cycle, the IS and IRD control lines of the IDMA port are asserted and the MS byte of the data is read and the LS byte is written to latch B. For the second bus cycle, the output enable of latch B is asserted and the LS byte of the data is read. Glue logic for the interface is programmed into a GAL16V8 PLD to reduce chip count.V. Gain Control of a Filter Using a Slide Potentiometer and Look-Up Table Suppose we have a digital filter and we wish to control the pass band gain over a specified range of boost and cut using an external potentiometer. Specifically, consider the

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emil Salib, James Madison University

componentsThe following are brief descriptions of the sub-system components.Dfrobot Water Pressure SensorThe well pressure is monitored using an analog water-pressure sensor (see Figure 2b) from Gravity[2].DS18B20 Temperature SensorThe ambient temperature is monitored by a DS18B20 waterproof digital sensor (see Figure: 2a).We chose this sensor because it’s waterproof [3] and suitable for a farm environment. This sensorhas three wires: ground, power, and Data. Our Data wire ran to a breadboard that connected a4.7 kilo-ohm resistor between the Data wire and the power wire per the supplier’s recommenda-tion. (a) Ds18B20 Temperature Sensor. (b) DfRobot Water Pressure Sensor. Figure 2: Temperature

Collection

2008 GSW

Authors

Caleb Hanson; Marwan Al-Haik; Claudia Luhrs; Jonathan Phillips

N u m b e r o f P a rtic le s 60 40 20 0 5 10 0 20 0

Collection

2008 GSW

Authors

Mohamad H. Ahmadian

topromote and teach high-level critical skills in the classroom. This capstone course provides ameans for student academic achievement. Requiring students to do multiple projects and usingmulti-stage method of presentation will enable students to: (1) learn from their mistakes, (2) starttroubleshooting at the early stage of the design, and (3) understand the importance of time-management concept. References1. Pariser, B., 2001, Teaching Critical Thinking, Proceedings of 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.2. Schertz, K. A., Whitney, T.A., 2001, Design Tools for Engineering Teams: An Integrated Approach, Delmar Publishing Company.3

Conference Session

Focus on Faculty

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Hacker, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Winny Dong, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mary Lucero Ferrel, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.7 Wasburn, M. H., “Strategic Collaboration ™: A Model for Mentoring Women Faculty in Science, Engineering,and Technology,” Proc. of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.8 Bates, R. A., “Constructing an Interdisciplinary Peer Mentoring Network for First Year Faculty,” Proc. of the 2005ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.9 Jones, B. E., D. Martinez, “Meeting the Mentoring Needs of New Faculty: An Interdisciplinary Experience,” Proc.of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.10 Autenrieth, R., K. Butler-Purry, A. H. Price, and J. Rinehart, “A ‘Grass Roots’ Mentoring Model to CreateChange,” Proc. of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.11 “Faculty Mentoring

Conference Session

Teaching Mechanics of Materials and General Mechanics Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Habib Sadid, Idaho State University; Richard Wabrek, Idaho State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Materials, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2002.4. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R. and DeWolf, J. T., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, McGraw Hill, 2008.5. Hibbeler, R.C., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2007.6. Gere, J. M. and Goodno, B. J., Mechanics of Materials, Seventh Edition, CL-Engineering, 2008.7. Bedford, A. and Liechti, K.M., Mechanics of Materials, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.8. Riley, W.F., Sturges, L.D. and Morris, D.H., Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1999.9. Wempner, G., Mechanics of Solids, PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1995.10. Timoshenko, S. P. and Gere, J. M., Mechanics of Materials, Fourth

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education Program Innovation

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sean Falkowski, University of Dayton; Gilah Pomeranz, Sinclair Community College; Monica Pfarr, Sinclair Community College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

information about manufacturing careers and degree programs; (b) opportunities for interested individuals to investigate manufacturing through personal contacts with educators and industry representatives; and (c) invitations to attend events.• Education: Ensure the institutions have capacity and quality programs to serve interested individuals. Adopt and/or adapt curricular materials developed by community college faculty as appropriate. The NSF-ATE Manufacturing Centers are well suited to provide curricular materials for a broad array of manufacturing degree programs.• Local Champions: Develop a local group of manufacturing champions who will

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Monday Potpourri

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tammy VanDeGrift, University of Portland; Sherry Liao, University of Portland

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

1. Arduino. (2017). http://www.arduino.org/, last accessed: January 26, 2017. 2. Cardella, M. E., Wolsky, M., Paulsen, C. A., Jones, T. R. (2013). Informal Pathways to Engineering. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 3. Carnasciali, M-I., Thompson, A. E., Thomas, T. J. (2013). Factors influencing students’ choice of engineering major. In Proceedings of the 120 th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA. 4. Conrad, J. M., Harkins, M. S., Taylor, D. B., Mayhorn, J., Raquet, J. (2015). Prospect for Success in Engineering: Assessing Freshmen Curriculum Engagement. In Proceedings of the 7th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference. Roanoke

Conference Session

Design Methodologies 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Henry David Banks, James Madison University; Alexander R. Murphy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Matt Robert Bohm, Florida Polytechnic University; Julie S. Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

functions, b. Noting low-level functions, c. Noting system boundaries, and d. Noting system inputs and outputs. 3. Students functional modeling ability as measured by Question 4 would decrease each year following initial instruction during sophomore year.Figure 2: Rubric for assessing function-flow responses used to assess Questions 2 and 3 on the FunSkillinstrument.3.3 ScoringTo score the FunSkill instrument, three strategies were employed. For Question 1, responseswere scored simply as correct or incorrect as to whether the students correctly identified theresponse as a function or not. Question 1 was scored only by one rater, an undergraduate studentat the university where this study occurred. Correct and

Conference Session

Relationships Between Skills and Knowledge Domains

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Keith E. Hedges, Drury University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

: Cambridge University Press, 1959.[2] B. E. Seely, “Patterns in the history of education reform: A brief essay,” in Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Education to the New Century, National Academy of the Sciences, Ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005, pp. 114-130.[3] C. M. Vest, “Educating engineers for 2020 and beyond,” in Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Education to the New Century, National Academy of the Sciences, Ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2005, pp. 160-169.[4] J. J. Duderstadt, “Engineering for a changing world: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education,” in The Millennium Project. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 17

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Wendy Roldan, University of Washington; Taryn Shalini Bipat, University of Washington; Jessica Carr, University of Washington; Elena Agapie, University of Washington; Andrew Davidson, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

-centered design charrettes for K-12 outreach,” interactions, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 74–77, 2018.[5] E. Rose, A. Davidson, E. Agapie, and K. Sobel, “Designing our future students: Introducing User Experience to teens through a UCD charette,” in Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, 2016, pp. 1–6.[6] A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman, and S. I. Safferman, “Understanding K–12 engineering outreach programs,” Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2004.[7] G. S. Jakubowski, “Is there a role for ASEE in K-12 education?,” ASEE Prism, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 41, 2002.[8] B. Moskal and C. Skokan, “Supporting the k-12 classroom through

Conference Session

Computing Technology Applications-II

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vuk Marojevic, Virginia Tech; Antoni Gelonch-Bosch, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; Jeffrey Reed, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

,  Discuss the pros and cons of alternative technical solutions, and  Debate possible evolutionary paths for the standard being analyzed.We propose six learning stages with specific learning objective in each stage. These aredescribed in continuation.3.1 ContextThe student needs to get familiar with the standard and the standardization mechanics. Theinstructor thus provides a) A high-level description of the standard with certain details, describing theoretical concepts and employed technologies, identifying relevant working parameters and expected system behaviors, b) The standard specifications and the relationships among the main and auxiliary documents, and c) The introduction to the software framework to be used

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, University of West Florida

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Paper ID #18477, pp.1-25.7. A. Mallik, S. M. M. Rahman, S. B. Rajguru, V. Kapila, “Examining the variations in the TPACK framework for teaching robotics-aided STEM lessons of varying difficulty,” in Proc. of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 24 - 27, 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Paper ID #23190, pp.1-23.8. S. M. M. Rahman, V. J. Krishnan, V. Kapila, “Exploring the dynamic nature of TPACK framework in teaching STEM using robotics in middle school classrooms,” in Proc. of 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25 - 28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Paper ID #18463, pp.1-29.9. http://www.tpack.org/ Accessed April 22, 201910. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Emery Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

of Engineering Education, vol. 13, pp. 190-197, 1997.[6] M. B. R. Vallim, J. M. Farines and J. E. R. Cury, “Practicing engineering in a freshmanintroductory course,” Education, IEEE Transaction on, vol. 49, pp.74-79, 2006.[7] S. D. Sheppard and J. Jenison, “Thoughts on freshman engineering design experiences,” inFrontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE’96. 26th Annual Conference, the proceedings of,pp. 909-913 vol. 2, 1996.[8] Reid,K., Ferguson, D.M., “Enhancing the entrepreneurial mindset of freshman engineers”, inAmerican Society of Engineering Education, proceedings of, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[9] Singh, P., Moncada, M.V., “Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset by internationaldevelopment project”, in American Society of Engineering