facilities - 1545 – 1600: Wrap-up and high school students departThe schedule for the final day is intentionally set up to be “soft” to accommodate any issues thatmay need to be worked out before students leave.Future WorkA substantial amount of work is yet to be done before the camp is run. The sessions coveringElectricity Basics, Multisim Introduction, Multisim AC Analysis, and Low-pass and High-passFilters have been planned, but none of them have gone through a dry run to be refined and testedfor time.The Amplifier session has been planned at a high level, but a detailed plan still needs to be done.The pre-camp and post-camp assessment surveys have been drafted (see Appendix B), but arenot yet finalized.The Industrial Engineering Technology
become the focus of the workbut remain a tool to aid in meeting project objectives. To facilitate implementation, thepreviously listed seven project management activities are integrated into existing work as muchas possible. Specifically, they are completed and assessed as part of five distinct assignments: a. Project Proposal: includes amongst other things project management activities of scope definition, schedule or milestones, and communication plan. b. Design Report: in addition to the technical design work, includes a detailed cost estimate that is the basis of the team’s approved budget. c. Commissioning and Test Plan d. Final Presentation and Report e. Status Reports: these dashboard reports are issued monthly, starting at the end
R1 R 2 Fig. 2 The negative feedback model of (a) the voltage follower, (b) the non-inverting operational amplifier and (c)the inverting operational amplifier. Spring 2017 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 7-8, 2017 MSUIn the table 1, a thorough derivation of the closed loop gain expressions is presented. The voltage follower The non-inverting amplifier The inverting amplifier v o A oL v d v o A oL v d v o A oL v d v o A oL v in v f v o A oL v in v f v o A oL v in v f v o A
Proceedings, pp. 229-231, ISBN 978-972-752-199-9, Porto, 2016.5 – S. Chakrabarti, E. Borbely, N. Baker, P. Hall, P. Marca, B. Nørgaard, E. Sjoer, K. Scalzo,Z. Guoqing, Are We Ready to Facilitate Learning in the 21st Century? A Debate On theCompetencies of Global CPD and CEE Leaders and Managers, IACEE2016 Proceedings, pp.227-228, ISBN 978-972-752-199-9, Porto, 2016.6 – B. Nørgaard, E. Sjoer, M. Goossens, Documenting the Need for Sustainable KnowledgeFlows Between HEI’s and SME’s Using Tailor Made Continuing Education Approaches in aEuropean Engineering Context, IACEE2016 Proceedings, pp. 147-152, ISBN 978-972-752-199-9, Porto, 2016.
& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/304599. Freeman, S. F., & Pfluger, C., & Whalen, R., & Schulte Grahame, K., & Hertz, J. L., & Variawa, C., & Love, J. O., & Sivak, M. L., & Maheswaran, B. (2016, June), Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot with First-Year Engineering Students Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.2659510. Wilczynski, V., & Zinter, J., & Wilen, L. (2016, June), Teaching Engineering Design in an Academic Makerspace: Blending Theory and Practice to Solve Client-based Problems Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New
configuration changes that the homeoccupant can accomplish without professional assistance, allow for built-in security features, andpotential cost savings.The above paper is the result of a research thesis presented to the graduate faculty of MiddleTennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the Master of Science degree in EngineeringTechnology. The research has enhanced the real-world applications and hands-on experiences ofthe author.Bibliography1. Williams, B. (2005). A History of Light and Lighting. Retrieved September 15, 2006 from http://www.mts.net/~william5/history/hol.htm2. Driscoll, E. B. (2002). A Timeline for Home Automation. Retrieved September 20, 2006 from http://www.eddriscoll.com
(freshman course): Provides an overview of the field of ECE and introduces some of the fundamental tools needed to solve problems in this field. Fundamentals of ECE: A. Electronic Devices & Circuits: Provides an introduction to semiconductor devices and circuit analysis with links to digital electronics and signal processing. B. Signal & Information Processing: Provides mathematical and computational tools for processing signals and information, including sampling, impulse response, convolution, frequency response, and filtering, in terms of both time-domain and frequency-domain analysis. C. Structure and Design of Digital Systems: Provides a foundation and working
60 55 50 Env Eng A B C D F G H I USMA Engineering Major Figure 2. Cadet performance on FEE ethics questions (8 total) for all USMA Engineering Programs in spring 2007. Letters on the abscissa represent one of the other nine engineering programs at USMA. The overall USMA weighted Page 13.114.3 average was 80% and the environmental engineering national average was 79%.Given the substantial amount of education and training on ethics at
Education (Gulf-Southwest Section), Austin, Texas. 6. Gregory, J. M., Carter, W. J., Gregory, P. S., 1997, The Student's Handbook for Academic Survival in College, McGraw-Hill. 7. Maas, J. B., Wherry, M. L., Axelrod, D. J., Hogan, B. R., Blumin, J. A., 1999, Power Sleep: The Revolutionary Program that Prepares Your Mind for Peak Performance, HarperPerennial, New York. 8. Roffward, H. P., Muzio, J. N., Dement, W. C., 1966, Ontogenetic Development of the Human Sleep-Dream Cycle, Science 152:604-619.JAMES M. GREGORYDr. Gregory has served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering atTexas Tech University for eight years. He has spent over a decade in the research and
conceptual design shown in (a) utilizes the principle ofequilibrium to provide the unit’s motion. The theory is that if a mass of substantial weight (thebattery) is displaced from the center of the unit, the unit will move to regain equilibrium. Theconceptual design shown in (b) utilizes motor driven gears that will rotate the shell of theelliptical unit. The equilibrium seeking conceptual design has the advantage over the dual gearedmotor design in the sense that it allows for rotation on all axes while the dual geared motordesign doesn’t. When the evaluation was performed, the equilibrium seeking unit ranked thehighest in the critical criteria of ease of implementation, final manufacturing cost, and reliability
AC 2009-970: A PRELIMINARY SURVEY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS COURSESNATIONWIDESeamus Freyne, Manhattan College An ASEE member since 2003, Seamus Freyne is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Manhattan College in New York City. His research interests include concrete materials, sustainability, and ethics.Micah Hale, University of Arkansas W. Micah Hale is an associate professor at the University of Arkansas where he teaches courses in civil engineering materials and concrete design. In addition to his teaching interests, he also conducts research in the areas of concrete materials and structures
our applied cryptography learning modules into theircourses.Learning Module Design GoalsBefore we created our active learning modules, we articulated several design goals. Inspecific, we wanted to: 1. Provide students with a portable laboratory environment that would enable them to continue their active learning after the class period has ended and the laboratory closed. a. Distribute laboratory software for free. b. Eliminate college’s need to track software licenses. 2. Empower students to demonstrate laboratory learning activities at home or at work. 3. Free the instructor from administrative budget constraints (both time and cost). 4. Free the instructor to choose most appropriate
,electronic, computer and information systems.The objective is to provide skills for the student to be able to navigate through the followinglevels of abstraction/conceptualization that are prevalent in today's energy, signals and computerand information systems. These are (a) materials (semiconductor), (b) electronic devices, (c)lumped circuit elements, (d) amplifiers, (e) digital signals, (f) combinational logic, (g) clockeddigital (sequential logic), (h) instruction set (architecture), (i) programming language (software).In addition to the linear chain presented above for digital systems the students will becomeversatile with the following analog systems abstractions: operational amplifier, filters and analogsystem components which more often than
-credit hour course to provide Page 1.247.1substantial design experience in the freshman year, was implemented in Winter Quarter, 1996; (b) a 2- 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedingscredit hour, sophomore-level course employing writing to explore the social impacts of technology andengineering ethics will be implemented in Spring Quarter, 1996; and (c) a 2-credit hour, sophomore-level"Introduction to Design" will also be implemented in Spring Quarter, 1996.METHODS1. Curriculum Design Course development is guided by the ideas outlined by Stice on teaching problem-solving skills 2.According to Stice
present project therefore is an effort todevelop a much more comprehensive Compressible Fluid Flow Solver (CFFS) intended forclassroom and educational use.Objectives of the paperIn the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University, compressible flow course isan elective course typically offered in the spring semester of each year. It is a three-credit hourclass with three 1-hour lectures per week. This paper describes the development of a web-basesolver for compressible flows using Java programming language. The main goal of the solver isto provide students with a software tool that can be used in the compressible flow course. Themain objectives of the project are (a) To design and develop a compressible flow solver (b) To test and
: Investigation of student understanding,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 994–1003 (Nov. 1992); https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003.6 Shaffer, P.S. and McDermott, L.C., “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of instructional strategies,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 1003–1013 (Nov. 1992); https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16979.7 Ekey,R., Edwards, A., McCullough, R., Reitz, W., and Mitchell, B., “A Fan-tastic Alternative to Bulbs:Learning Circuits with Fans,” Phys. Teach. 55, 13 (2017); doi: 10.1119/1.4972490.8 L.C. McDermott, ”Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned-Closing the gap.” Am. J. Phys. 59, (4) 301 (April 1991); doi: 10.1119/1.16538.9 National Science Foundation, Division
-university collaboration. (2010).8 Santoro, M. D. & Betts, S. C. Making industry-university partnerships work. Research-Technology Management 45, 42-46 (2002).9 Edmondson, G., Valigra, L., Kenward, M., Hudson, R. & Belfield, H. Making industry-university partnerships work: Lessons from successful collaborations. Science Business Innovation Board AISBL (2012).10 Perkmann, M. et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy 42, 423-442, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007 (2013).11 Mutter, B. V. & Pruett, R. in Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education conference
. Yee, "How Service Learning Affects Students," Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000, p. 21.4. J. Eyler and D. E. Giles, Jr., Where's the Learning in Service-Learning?, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.5. I. S. Fisher, "Integrating Service-Learning Experiences into Postcollege Choices," in Service-Learning in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996, p. 209.6. S. Krishnan and T. L. Nilsson, "Engineering Service Learning: Case Study on Preparing Students for the Global Community," in American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, San Antonio, 2012.7. B. Tempest, M. Pando, S. Loree and M. A. Hoff, "A Student
85 89 88Bragging Points Earned, Average n/a n/a 51 59Weighted Bragging Points Earned n/a n/a 88 92Curve Given 1.5 1.0 0 0Earned A before curve 1 ( 4%) 7 (28%) 18 (50%) 11 (32%)Earned B before curve 24 (96%) 12 (48%) 18 (50%) 23 (68%)Earned C before curve 0 ( 0%) 6 (24%) 0 ( 0%) 0 ( 0%)Earned A w/ curve or Bragging Pts 8 (32%) 8 (32%) 19 (53%) 12 (35%)Earned B
realization reflects adeveloping understanding of the dialogic nature of communication.Bibliography1. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Engineering Criteria 2000, ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD 1998.2. Prados J.W., Peterson, G.D., Lattuca, L.R., “Quality Assurance of Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 165-184, 205.3. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2004.4. Kazmer, D., Duffy, J., Perna, B., Learning through service : analysis of a first college wide service learning course, paper 2006
) is generally regarded as the mainstay of theABET accreditation. As per ABET accreditation requirements in the context of EC 2000,engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates possess the following skills:“(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams(e) an ability to identify, formulates, and solve engineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of
remark on theimpact of the experience as it has been observed with the first generation course participants.Furthermore, other similar activities that have been developed as a result of this course are alsodiscussed.II. Effective PedagogyThe Kolb’s learning style inventory (KLSI) is based on the concept that the learning processfollows a cycle of activities consisting of four distinct segments, namely (a) feeling (throughconcrete experience or CE); (b) thinking (through abstract conceptualization or AC); (c)watching (through reflective observation or RO); and (d) doing (through active experimentation Page 11.101.2or AE)9,10. It is readily
Delphi Ford Motor Company General Motors DTE Energy Technologies Steelcase Herman Miller Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance (GEMA) Div. of Daimler ChryslerThe fourth key component was students. In an attempt to gauge student interest, aspeaker series was planned to bring in an environmental speaker every term. Eachspeaker came to campus twice to repeat their presentation to both A and B sections ofKettering students. Surveys were distributed with questions relating to student andemployer interest in the topic and the need for a course of this nature. Survey responsewas overwhelmingly positive
theadvantage that it can be implemented by adjusting course content without completelyrevamping the overall curriculum. Throughout the curriculum the issue of designthinking will be introduced and reinforced starting with the cornerstone course andculminating with the capstone course.Bibliography1. ABET (2000). http://www.abeLorgFollow the accreditation link to the engineering technology accreditation criteria.2. Fronczak, FJ., and Webster, J.G., "A Series of Design Courses in Biomedical Engineering," Proceedingsof the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.3. Tompkins, W. J., "Using Design as a Backbone of a BME Curriculum," Proceedings of the 2001 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition.4. Sheppard, K, and Gallois, B., "The Design Spine: Revision
: ‚ Design of Thermal Systems by W. F. Stoecker1 ‚ Analysis and Design of Energy Systems by B. K. Hodge and R. P. Taylor2 ‚ Design of Fluid Thermal Systems by W. S. Janna3 ‚ Elements of Thermal-Fluid System Design by L. C. Burmeister4 ‚ Design and Optimization of Thermal Systems by Y. Jaluria5 ‚ Design Analysis of Thermal Systems by R. F. Boehm6 ‚ Design and Simulation of Thermal Systems by N. V. Suryanarayana, O. Arici and N. Suryanarayana7 ‚ Thermal Design and Optimization by A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran8 The main criteria for choosing the textbook are topical contents, problem sets, workedexamples, and design projects. Comparing these textbooks is difficult as many core topics aresimilar but each
to lack of a control group, this belief cannot be confirmed by the current study.Bibliography1. B. Ferri and J. Auerbach, Work in Progress - A Program to Incorporate Portable Labs Into Lecture- Based Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses, 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 27 - 30, 2010, Washington, DC.2. A. Niemi, In-Class Circuits: Using Passive Components to Create Active Learning, Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2008, Pittsburgh, PA.3. C. H. Forsberg, A Demonstration Unit to Enhance Heat Transfer Lectures on Natural and Forced Convection, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, TN.4. A. Gilat, Matlab - An
Paper ID #6235Industry engagement in a manufacturing simulation courseDr. Ali Alavizadeh, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Dr. Ali Alavizadeh is an Assistant Professor in the MCET Department at Indiana University-Purdue Uni- versity (Fort Wayne, Indiana). He has taught at the George Washington University (Washington, DC), and Morehead State University (Morehead, KY) in the fields of Engineering Management and Systems En- gineering and in Industrial and Engineering Technology, respectively. His industrial experiences include enterprise architecture, systems analysis, and software engineering for private
Paper ID #9198A Practical Approach to the Carnot EfficiencyDr. David C Zietlow, Bradley University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Page 24.89.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Practical Approach to the Carnot EfficiencyBackgroundThe Carnot cycle is a valuable tool to help students and practitioners understand the theoreticallimits of heat engines, refrigeration cycles and heat pumps. Presented here is a practicalapproach to developing the Carnot efficiency for a heat engine and coefficient
shown in Figure 4; thisis a key holder made of several assembled parts that would be screwed into a wall. Teams forthis course typically consisted of four members. In the fall 2012 semester, one team (out of nine)documented the use of the Mold Design tool to assist in the manufacturability of their product. Afill analysis of a part from that group’s project is shown in Figure 5. Over the course of threesemesters, no students have taken the opportunity to create tooling in lieu of their standardENTC 380 project. Page 23.38.5 Figure 2. Autodesk Mold Design Tool Fill Simulation of Phone Cover a. b
., 1996, Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Page 23.194.109 Sage, A. P., and Armstrong Jr., J. E., 2000, Introduction to Systems Engineering, Wiley and Sons.10 Nicholls, M. G., Cargill, B. J., & Dhir, K. S. (2004). Using OR for diagnosis and facilitation in change programmes: a university application. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(5), 440-452.11 de Figueiredo, J. N., Barrientos, M., & Angel, M. (2011). A decision support methodology for increasing school efficiency in Bolivia's low‐income communities. International Transactions in