, R.W. & Brown, S.D. & Hackett, Gail. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development (4th Ed.. 255-311).[5] Oyserman, Daphna & Destin, Mesmin. (2010). Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention. The Counseling psychologist. 38. 1001-1043. 10.1177/0011000010374775.[6] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).[7] Oyserman, D. (2015). Pathways to success through identity-based motivation, 188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195341461.001.0001[8] Knight, M., & Cunningham, C
mechanics curriculum, as well as the efficacy of differentiatedlearning both within this class and as students continue through their curriculum in both subjectareas.BibliographyB. S. Bloom, “Mastery Learning,” in Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice, New York:Rinehart & Winston, 1971, pp. 47–63.Durm, Mark W. "An A is not an A is not an A: A history of grading." In The educational forum,vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 294-297. Taylor & Francis Group, 1993.Agrawal, Ashok K., and Stephanie Harrington-Hurd. "Preparing next generation graduates for aglobal engineering workforce: Insights from tomorrow's engineers." Journal of EngineeringEducation Transformations 29, no. 4 (2016): 5-12.Nilson, Linda B. Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating
engineering programs, 2022–2023. url: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineeringprograms-2022-2023/.”[2] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005.[3] T. Kotulski and S. Murray, “The national engineering laboratory survey,” Labshare Project. December, 2010.[4] M. Robinson, “The machina: an ecosystem of control system experiments,” ASEE NCS Regional Conference, Pittsburgh: ASEE 2022.[5] J. Sarik and I. Kymissis, “Lab kits using the arduino prototyping platform,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. T3C–1, IEEE, 2010.[6] P. Jamieson and J
. M. Allen, “Essential Functions of Academic Advising: What Students Want and What Students Get,” NACADA Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 56-66, 2006.[5] B. J. Zimmerman, A. Bandura and M. Martinez-Pons, “Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 663-676, 1992.[6] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366-395, 2016.[7] B. W. Smith, J. Dalen, K. Wiggens, E. Tooley, P. Christopher, and J. Bernard, “The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the
MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engineering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and AGEP, S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Ms. Andrea Stancescu, NC State University Hello, My name is Andrea Stancescu and I am a junior in the undergraduate applied mathematics and statistics program at NC State. I have been working with Dr. Brawner since August of 2021 on collecting and analyzing the survey results from the AGEP-NC project. I am looking forwards to working with everyone!Dr. Maureen Grasso, NC State University Maureen Grasso former Dean of the Graduate School at North Carolina State University and the Univer- sity of Georgia has over 16 years as a dean in
, Natesan, P. Vidhya, and Xiao-Zhi Gao. "Virtual laboratory: A boon to the mechanical engineering education during covid-19 pandemic." Higher Education for the Future 8.1 (2021): 31-46.5. Makransky, Guido, Thomas S. Terkildsen, and Richard E. Mayer. "Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning." Learning and Instruction 60 (2019): 225-236.6. Deshpande, Amit A. and Samuel H. Huang. "Simulation games in engineering education: A state‐of‐the‐art review." Computer Applications in Engineering Education 19.3 (2011): 399-410.7. Brown, Corina E., et al. "Visualizing molecular structures and shapes: A comparison of virtual reality, computer simulation, and traditional
validation strategy." Global Journal of Engineering Education 13.3 (2011): 96-101.9. Lui V.M., Gallardo- Córdova, K.E., Castillo- Díaz S., "Performance and authentic assessment in a mechanical engineering course." Global Journal of Engineering Education 20.1 (2018): 30-38.10. Cruz M.L., Saunders-Smits G.N., Groen P., "Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review." European Journal of Engineering Education (2019): 1-29.
. Johnson, and C. J. Finelli, “The role of college knowledge and proactive behavior on participation in cocurricular activities,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 114–142, 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20380.[4] C. A. Capper, Interpretivist Epistomology. New York City NY: Routledge, 2018.[5] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.[6] K. Charmaz, Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, 2006.[7] E. Nordmann, C. E. Küepper-Tetzel, L. Robson, S. Phillipson, G. I. Lipan, and P. McGeorge, “Lecture capture: Practical recommendations for students and instructors.,” Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. Psychol., 2020, doi: 10.1037/stl0000190.[8
-option multiple-choice test, for example,there is a 25% chance of choosing a correct option by pure luck. Similarly, a test taker has 75% chance ofchoosing the wrong option inadvertently. The fact that what students really know may be so confoundedundermines the objective of administering CIs to probe their prior knowledge. Similarly, it may also bedifficult to determine whether a respondent chose a wrong option on the CI test due to a lack of priorknowledge or as the result of having a misconception(s) about the concept the test item assesses. Accordingto extant conceptual change literature, being able to differentiate between misconceptions and a lack ofknowledge has considerable implications for effective pedagogy [9, 11, 12]. Thus, an
in space and earth system sciences as well asprecision agriculture and environmental stewardship are aligned with the NASA and USDAeducational and research objectives, the land grant mission of University of Maryland EasternShore(UMES), workforce development undertakings, and the goals of the “Smart Farming” and“AIRSPACES” projects ongoing on campus for the past several years. Since their inception, theseprojects have embraced the experiential learning paradigm within a multidisciplinary verticallyintegrated project framework [1, 2]. Undergraduate engineering and computer science students, aswell as other STEM majors, have worked alongside graduate student(s) in the doctoral program inFood Science and Technology (FDST) to advance the project
thank the anonymousreviewers for their feedback.References[1] Austin Cory Bart, Dennis G. Kafura, Clifford A. Shaffer, and Eli Tilevich. Reconciling the promise and pragmatics of enhancing computing pedagogy with data science. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2018, Baltimore, MD, USA, February 21-24, 2018, pages 1029–1034, 2018.[2] Lillian N. Cassel, Michael Posner, Darina Dicheva, Don Goelman, Heikki Topi, and Christo Dichev. Advancing data science for students of all majors (abstract only). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Seattle, WA, USA, March 8-11, 2017, page 722, 2017.[3] Jeffrey S. Saltz, Neil I. Dewar, and
/09585192.2013.826714 [6] P.K. Matsuda & T. Silva. “Cross-cultural composition: Mediated integration of US and international students”. Composition Studies, 27(1), pp. 15-30, 1999. [7] M. Rowlings & E. Sue. “Preparedness of Chinese students for American culture and communicating in English”. Journal of International Students, 3(1), pp. 29-40, 2013. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v3i1.516 [8] S. Wang, X. Sun & C. Liu. “Intercultural analysis of communication anxieties encountered by international students in the United States”. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(2), pp. 217-234, 2010. https://www-s3-live.kent.edu/s3fs-root/s3fs- public/file/16SongWangXiujieSunChangyuanLiu.pdf [9] Education for
funded in 2014-2018 under grant EEC-1359137, in 2010-2013 under grant EEC-1004915 and in 2006-2008 under grant EEC-0552737.References1. E. Seymour, A.-B Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, T. "Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: first findings from a three-year study," Sci. Educ., 88, pp. 493-594, 2004.2. A.W. Astin, What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass., 1993.3. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T., How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass., 1991.4. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for
curriculums to determine whichseems to be the most industry relevant.References1. Gupta, U. (2016). Crowd sourcing decisions: an uphill task. Human Capital Magazine, 52- 55.2. Satterfield, J.M., Adler, S.R., Chen, H.C., Hauer, K.E., Saba, G.W., & Salazar, R. (2010). Creating an ideal social and behavioural sciences curriculum for medical students. Medical Education, 44(12), 1194-1202.3. Nakayama, S. (2012). SH&E curriculum: involving practicing safety professionals in its development. Professional Safety, 57(5), 68-73.4. Thompson, T.A., & Purdy, J.M. (2009). When a Good Idea Isn’t Enough: Curricular Innovation as a Political Process. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2), 188- 207.5. Woodward, B., Imboden, T
behavior. Thesituational leadership lens will also be shown to provide a mental model to understand why adirective or supportive practice is appropriate for a particular context. Finally, it will be shownthat mentees can use the mental model beyond STEM innovation and have a framework to use intheir professional careers.AcknowledgmentThis research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant (DUE 2120936). Anyopinions and findings expressed in this material are of the authors and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the NSF.References[1] S. Kulturel-Konak, “Overview of Student Innovation Competitions and Their Roles in Stem Education,” in Proceedings of Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting, Virtual, Nov 12-13
Classroom in the Online Environment of Covid? Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022. 30(2): p. 517-531.5. Morgan, J., E. Lindsay, C. Howlin, and M. Bogaard, Pathways of Students' Progress through an on-Demand Online Curriculum, in ASEE Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.6. Tsai, Y.-S., D. Rates, P.M. Moreno-Marcos, P.J. Muñoz-Merino, I. Jivet, M. Scheffel, H. Drachsler, C.D. Kloos, and D. Gašević, Learning Analytics in European Higher Education—Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education, 2020. 155: p. 103933.7. Mavroudi, A., M. Giannakos, and J. Krogstie, Supporting Adaptive Learning Pathways through the Use of Learning Analytics: Developments, Challenges and Future
written reflection. Still, discussions were robust and useful. As a co-PI team, wediscussed how Year 1’s focus on self-inquiry could have made faculty feel more vulnerable toshare their reflections in writing. We learned from the evaluation reports that some memberswere concerned that, with the small community size, their work would be easily re-identified. Asan alternative data source, we have turned to materials collected during the workshops: Reportsby participants, reflections written by the PI team shortly after each meeting, and the evaluationteam’s reports, which share insightful summaries of focus group data. The research plancontinues to develop.Aim #4: Spread the impact of the FLC beyond the members of the FLC, to create a ripple
the lessons mainly focus on theintroduction of the EOP concepts. However, students’ projects may be changed for other courses.For example, the feedback loop was in line well with systems thinking, so that projects related tocontrol system design fit well with the scope of Chemical Process Control. As for Process Design,the life cycle analysis should be emphasized more in the students’ project.Reference[1] S. E. Uhunamure and K. Shale, “A SWOT analysis approach for a sustainable transition to renewable energy in South Africa,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13073933.[2] J. Schmidt et al., “A new perspective on global renewable energy systems: Why trade in energy carriers matters,” Energy
should havethem focus on different water sectors to further ensure that the differentiate themselves. Toensure that students explore a job of interest, I will encourage them to conduct the assignmentindividually if they are not in agreement with their partner(s). I repeatedly offered to connectstudents with a professional, but it was only as the presentations approached that any groups tookme up on the offer. Based on this experience, I will try to emphasize even more the need forstudents to network early. I want to make the assignment better for the students. I am also interested in betterunderstanding the value of this type of assignment. In the future, I intend to ask students if theystayed in touch with the professional connection and
, and Z. S. Hazlett, “Relationships betweenPrediction Accuracy, Metacognitive Reflection, and Performance in Introductory GeneticsStudents,” LSE, vol. 21, no. 3, p. ar45, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-12-0341.[11] N. V. Dang, J. C. Chiang, H. M. Brown, and K. K. McDonald, “Curricular Activities thatPromote Metacognitive Skills Impact Lower-Performing Students in an Introductory BiologyCourse,” J Microbiol Biol Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 19.1.10, Mar. 2018, doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1324.[12] M. J. Hawker, L. Dysleski, and D. Rickey, “Investigating General Chemistry Students’Metacognitive Monitoring of Their Exam Performance by Measuring Postdiction Accuraciesover Time,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 832–840, May 2016, doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed
renewable energyeducation in particular and all other initiatives, in general, must ensure employment/self-employment tothe students upon successful completion.(h) It should preferably be provided in local languages for better acceptance and efficacy (good qualityteaching–learning resources materials should also be available in local languages at affordable prices).”The Burundi ContextBurundi is located in East Africa at a latitude of 3°S (below the equator). As an economy, Burundi hasseen steady growth over the last five years and is starting to attract significant foreign investment. It hasa plentiful supply of rainfall and solar irradiance which makes it ideal for hydroelectric and solar energysystems. However, at present, only 11% of the
(ed.gov)[2] A. Zilberman and L. Ice, “Employment projections for STEM occupations,” U.S. Bureau ofLabor Statistics, Jan-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-10/why-computer-occupations-are-behind-strong-stem-employment-growth.htm. [Accessed: 10-Feb-2023].[3] R. Brown et al., “Understanding STEM: Current Perceptions,” Technology and EngineeringTeacher, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 5-9, March 2011[4] P. Gilbert, "The Role of Role Models: How does Identification with STEM Role ModelsImpact Women's Implicit STEM Stereotypes and STEM Outcomes?" Order No. 3703388,Tulane University School of Science and Engineering, United States -- Louisiana, 2015.[5] M. S. Kearney and P. B. Levine, “Role models, mentors, and media influences,” The
Professor A’s course.Professor A explained the increasing struggle that students are having with their ability to solvesuch problems; the process of translating a word problem, selecting the proper formula(s), andexecuting those formulas has become more difficult for students, according to Professor A. Thislack in problem-solving proficiency, along with unit conversion difficulties, is important torecognize and understand as these are key components of engineering. In addition to gapsnoticed in the chemical engineering course, Professor A has also noticed greater difficulties instudents’ ability to utilize basic algebra and trigonometry skills compared to pre-pandemicstudents, amongst students in the engineering readiness course.Student Behavioral
all.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNumbers 1726306, 1725423, 1725659, 1726047, and 1725785. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would also like toacknowledge the collaborating faculty and students on the project, Dr. Julie Linsey, Dr. TracyHammond, Matthew Runyon, Dr. Vimal Viswanathan, and Dr. Ben Caldwell, for their assistancewith data collection and the development of the software.References[1] E. Odekirk-Hash and J. L. Zachary, “Automated Feedback on Programs Means Students Need Less Help From Teachers,” in ACM SIGCSE
−7and 𝑏 = 0.7355, and T (K) is the temperature of theair. The density of air is given by the ideal gas law expressed as 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑚 = 𝑅𝑇 (2)where 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑚 is the atmospheric pressure and R = 287 J/(kg K) is the gas constant. The Reynoldsnumber is defined as 𝑈𝐷 𝑅𝑒 = (3) 𝜇where U (m/s) is the average velocity and D = 0.04445 (m) is the inner diameter of the pipe. Thepressure coefficient can be expressed as 𝑝 𝐾=1
and the dedicated students participating in theproject. References[1] H. Pain, “A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods,”International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 11, no. 4, July 2012. [Online]. Available:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/10397. [Accessed Oct. 25,2022].[2] S. K. Rockwell, J. A. Albrecht, J. A., G. C. Nugent, & G. M. Kunz, (2012). “Using targetingoutcomes of programs as a framework to target photographic events in nonformal educationalprograms,” American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 33, no. 2, June, 2012. [Online]. Available:http://aje.sagepub.com/content/33/2/179. [Accessed Oct. 25, 2022].[3] RISE-UP Program
projects program," 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA, 2011, pp. T1F-1-T1F-7, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6143064.[6] R. Abler, E. Coyle, A. Kiopa, J. Melkers, "Team-based software/system development in a vertically- integrated project-based course," 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid City, SD, USA, 2011, pp. T3F-1-T3F-7, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2011.6142974.[7] R. Abler, J. Krogmeier, A. Ault, J. Melkers, T. Clegg, E. Coyle (2010) “Enabling And Evaluating Collaboration Of Distributed Teams With High Definition Collaboration Systems” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2-16987.[8] E.J. Coyle, J.V. Krogmeier, R.T. Abler, A. Johnson, S. Marshall
. Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse, 172.Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2006). Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of themultidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education. In LearningStyles and Learning: A Key to Meeting the Accountability Demands in Education (pp. 45-91).New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.Law, K., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance ina blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitivepresence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12.Muenks, K., Yan, V., & Telang, N. (2021). Who is
research enterprise. This is especially valuable in supporting the academic andprofessional success of scholars from diverse backgrounds and will facilitate the continuedsuccess of our REU site program and other undergraduate research programs at our University.Lessons learned can also support other undergraduate research programs by presenting anddisseminating our site structure and operations.Acknowledgements: We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National ScienceFoundation Division of Engineering Education and Centers REU grants 1062806, 1359167,1659657, and 1950645. We also acknowledge the support of Stony Brook University, and inparticular the Center for Inclusive Education, and Brookhaven National Laboratory.References: (1) Kendra S