or signed extension can be easily observed and understood. Students can place a bus wire in the schematic diagram and the bus is a cluster of nets such as 8-bit bus or 16-bit bus. In a bus, each net inside the bus must be defined with a name. The concatenation process simply arranges different sources of nets to merge into a bus and can be intuitively understood through the use of Multisim. 5. Student learning assessment The assessment was done with four project based learning. The first project was a two- digit calculator and purely based on a combinational logic design. Students used TERASIC DE0-nano boards to implement with a schematic design entry. The second project was based
& Modern Materials & Construction Methods 2 T 25-Apr Effective Presentations & Reports / Engineering Design - Considerations & Concepts 1 3 W 26-Apr Forces & Strength of Materials / Blog Tools 4 R 27-Apr London Underground…and Above - Transportation Systems 5 F 28-Apr Presentation 1 Presentation 1, Blog 1 6 M 1-May Structural Form, Concepts, & Terminology 7 T 2-May Royal Living & Fortresses- Windsor Castle & Tower of London 8 W 3-May Bridging the Old and New - Tower and Mellinium Bridges Project Proposal 2 9 R 4-May
Engineering Education(SUCCEED). JEDI employs FIU undergraduate engineering and computing students to designand carry out their own projects focused on equity-centered research, activism, and K-12outreach within the College of Engineering and Computing (CEC) and the local South Floridacommunity. The first two authors of this paper, Garcia and Elaouinate, joined the program in Fall2021 as part of the first cohort of JEDI ambassadors. Secules serves at the faculty mentor for theprogram, and Bond-Trittipo is the primary mentor for the student research groups.FIU is a large HSI in Miami, Florida. As of Spring 2022, the undergraduate enrollment for CECwas nearly 6,500 [16]. This student body is comprised of 66% Hispanic students, 11% Black orAfrican
, cross-cutting concepts orcontext areas). The STEELS also include connections to Pennsylvania Career Ready Skills, aPennsylvania specific context, and connections to standards from other content areas (e.g.,math).One of the reasons that the content and steering committees elected to model the T&E standardswithin the STEELS after the STEL was due to the strong foundation of peer-reviewed researchthat guided the development the STEL [1]. The STEL were the result of a multi-year project tore-envision the former STL [4]. Additionally, the content and steering committees believed theprocess used to develop the STEL resulted in a document that represented the views of a broadspectrum of stakeholders involved with P-12 T&E education. Hundreds
involvement offaculty from environmental engineering, University extension, and nursing to provide bothbreadth in how to engage with communities for design (i.e., from a nursing perspective) as wellas depth in how to understand and consider local food systems (i.e., from a University extensionperspective).IntroductionHistorically, the use of a traditional lecture-discussion pedagogical format augmented withextended homework assignments and a semester-long design project was employed to teach thedesign of wastewater treatment plants and other environmental cleanup technologies toapproximately 25 seniors in the final year of pursuing a baccalaureate degree in environmentalengineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, a state
Paper ID #40242Data Science (Dataying) for Early ChildhoodDr. Safia A. Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a postdoc in the computer science department at Kansas State University working with Vision and Data science projects. She has ten years of experience as a computer analyst and graphic de- signer. Besides, she’s passionate about developing curriculums for teaching coding, data science, AI, and engineering to young children by modeling playground environments. She tries to expand her experience by facilitating and volunteering for many STEM workshops.Lior Shamir, Kansas State University Associate
Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for
can be a catalyst for systemic change.II. The Mann Report: What It Does and Why It Is Worth Our Attention TodayAs mentioned earlier, Mann was the chief investigator for the Joint Committee on EngineeringEducation of the National Engineering Societies. This committee was formed in 1907 at theinitiative of the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education (SPEE) with collaborationfrom the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), American Society of MechanicalEngineers (ASME), Institute of Electrical Engineers (now IEEE), American Chemical Society,American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), and American Institute of MiningEngineers. A few years into the project, the Joint Committee recognized that they needed “someone trained in
materials wedeveloped and tested on WPA3 security algorithms.The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide an account of related work alongwith a brief overview of the project opportunity, objectives, and proposed solution. In Section3, we offer a brief description of the solution components designed, tested and exercised by ourstudents. Section 4 focuses on the solution component configurations in support of the lab exerciseson WPA3 security algorithms and in Section 5 we detail the lab exercises developed, tested andexercised. In Section 6, we offer a discussion including our students feedback and suggestions, ourconclusions, and potential next steps.2 Related Work and Our ProjectIn this section, we provide an account of related
of IntersectionalityKristen R. Moore, University at BuffaloWalter Hargrove, University at BuffaloNathan R. Johnson, University of South FloridaFernando Sánchez, University of St. ThomasAbstractUsing a citation network analysis, this project analyzes the 209 instances of the term“intersectionality” in the ASEE PEER repository to locate the central authors and texts thatinform the field’s use of the term. In this citational analysis, we suggest that the limited citationof Black women should be interrogated and redressed as a form of inequity. Framing this projectwithin the politics of citation and the current campaign to #CiteBlackWomen, we work toexplore how the term “intersectional” has been embraced, whose theories have been adopted,ignored
, she recently, in December 2020, graduated with a Master of Science in Project Management from The Citadel.Dr. Nandan Hara Shetty, The Citadel Dr. Nandan Hara Shetty is an assistant professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel, located in Charleston, South Carolina. He received his BE from Dartmouth College and his MS/PhD from Columbia University, researching the performance of rain gardens and roof gardens. He also worked for 11 years as an environmental engineer on construction and research of green infrastructure for the New York City Parks Department. Nandan is highly interested in engaging students, while pursuing dialogue with cities on urban climate and water research.Dr. William J. Davis
funded clusters of projects inengineering education research and practice that seek to define this emerging pattern. In addition,a series of academic articles, authored by influential policy thinkers, including universitypresidents and officials at the MoE, help elaborate the background, objectives, and implicationsof the 3E policy [16-19]. The official 3E policy documents are quite succinct in stating the goalsand strategies of engineering education reforms. To provide more context about the policydiscourse, we also examine four academic articles that aim to interpret the policy, authored byscholars who participated in the conversations that led to the formulation of the official 3E policydocuments.The following three sections present a close
classroom and laboratory curricula including online course platforms, and integrated technologies. She has been involved in both private and government grants as author and project director, and is currently PI of an NSF ATE grant, ”Increasing the Number of Engineering Technicians in Southeastern Pennsylvania.” A major goal of this collaborative effort with Drexel University is to connect for-credit, occupational technician education to workforce development certification programs. She was the faculty advisor to two student teams that made the final round of the NSF AACC Community College Innovation Challenge (CCIC) in 2016 and 2017. She and her students have been involved in STEM related outreach to local community
; Tamblyn, 1980; Boud & Feletti, 1997). The method requires carefully defined sets of problems that engage students in a structured process to develop a higher level of learning (Dahlgren, 2003). Class time can be dedicated for mini lectures to help scaffolding the problem, class discussions or students reporting (Norman & Schmidt, 1992; Weiss, 2003). Students learning in problem-based learning is self- directed, with the instructor playing the role of a facilitator (a coach, or a “guide on the side”) (Duch, Groh & Allen, 2001; Tan, 2003) 10 • Project-based learning: Project
be reduced solely to the question of how much development, butrather the more challenging question of how much of what kind of development could beoccurring.Impetus for developing the assessment instrumentThis paper describes the process by which we developed an assessment instrument to measurestudents’ interpretive understanding of engineering design concepts as nascent indication ofdeveloping expertise in the middle school engineering education context. We had multipleinterrelated goals for this project. In part, we realized the need to create a new alternativeassessment as one of several means by which we might evaluate student learning outcomesrelated to a narratively-based engineering curriculum aligned to the Next Generation
Paper ID #34925Engineering Graduate Education: An Overwhelming Journey ofFirst-Generation ImmigrantsDr. Hoda Ehsan, Georgia Institute of Technology Hoda is a postdoctoral fellow at Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing at Georgia Institute of Technology. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests
the survey were invited to an interview conducted near the endof the Winter semester or during the summer.Following the interview findings regarding team project experience (2016), we posed newquestions about peer relations in 2017. Findings from the 2017 interviews revealed topics relatedto equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI). New questions were included in 2018 interviews toexplore EDI-related experiences and discourses. This paper focuses on the data from studentswho were interviewed in 2018. In summer 2018, the [first author] met with 4 male and 3 femalestudents, to examine issues linked with inclusion and exclusion. This led to a greaterunderstanding of the issues linked with gender, socioeconomic status, and race, as well as
Education through NAU’s Center for Science Teaching and Learning. Her areas of interest include broadening participation in STEM, math curriculum development, and out-of-school time STEM experiences.Dr. Nena E. Bloom, Northern Arizona University Dr. Nena Bloom is an evaluator and education researcher at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University. The primary area of her work is evaluating STEM education projects that focus on opportunities for, and retention of, K-20 students in STEM areas, majors and fields. She also conducts education research focusing on questions about professional development for educators and how educators support student learning in STEM
, how people define those steps is different. Like the high school Project Lead the Way, there's twelve steps in the process, [in] middle school I've cut it down to about six steps.In addition to incorporating engineering design into her technology education curriculum, shealso does so in after-school programs. In addition, she participates in technology-based profes-sional development, some of which is run out of a local engineering college. Julie’s approach to engineering education is reminiscent of Papert’s [12] intentions withthe design of Logo as an object-to-think-with. This connection is in no small part due to Julie’suse of constructionist technologies (e.g. LEGO Mindstorms, Snap!, and more) and the universityprograms
usual process of research we followed, all the six steps [Aisha].From the interview data it was found that there was no set process for a research study to getapproval from the institution. The participants explained that anyone interested in conducting anEER related activity could just start by themselves without any prior approval. However, once thefaculty decided to start an EER project, they followed steps that are typically taken in conductingresearch. The first step in conducting EER was problem identification followed by formulatingresearch questions. The faculty said that research questions helped them dig in deeper and tookthem in the right direction in the literature. They decided on the methodology and framework usingthe research
Paper ID #29099Building Capacity to Promote STEAM in Communities - The impact ofprofessional development for teachers, instructors and staff members –Work in Progress –Mr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. In addition to my teaching responsibilities, I am involved in the outreach programs and activities of the department. I am the coordinator of three outreach programs 1) the NSF-ISE project ”Scientists for To- morrow” which goal is to promote Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) learning in community centers
Paper ID #28231The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in EngineeringDr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including the Rand Corporation, the American Association of Retired Persons, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Since 2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education
the Early Anglophone Caribbean: Islands in the Stream (Palgrave/Spring, 2018 forthcoming). Currently, she is at work on two new projects: one that examines the relationships between narratives of black lives and the rise of the novel in Europe in the 18th century, and another project examining the aesthetic translations of the neo-slave narrative genre within contemporary Caribbean cultural production.Dr. Stacy Blake-Beard, Simmons College Stacy Blake-Beard is the Deloitte Ellen Gabriel Professor of Women and Leadership at Simmons Col- lege’s School of Business, where she teaches organizational behavior. She is also Faculty Affiliate at the Center for Gender in Organizations at Simmons. Prior to joining Simmons, Dr
University, and PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Angela Harris, Stanford University Angela is currently a Fellow with the Thinking Matters program at Stanford University. Angela received her PhD in Stanford’s Environmental Engineering and Science Program (Spring 2015). Angela completed her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology prior to coming to Stanford for her M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Angela conducts research related to water, sanitation, and child health in developing countries. Angela has extensive experience in developing survey questionnaires
with original product ideas need the resources to evaluate the practicalityof their ideas, develop their products, and perform thorough tests to realize robust marketableproducts. Researchers working in labs and research centers use lab automation tools, such asNational Instruments’ LabVIEW7, to automate experiments. Connecting different types ofinstruments to computers to control experiments and acquire/analyze data is crucial toperforming some experiments. In other cases, it speeds up the experiment significantly, resultingin increased productivity. A large number of engineering and science students involved inprofessional project-based organizations like Network of Entrepreneurs, Engineers for aSustainable World, Student Space Programs Lab
implications foracademic practices. As such, this paper is a “welcome mat” or introduction for those interested inlearning more about APS. Components of the paper address questions researchers designing newstudies may have about the organizational and technical infrastructure that supported this project,or about the quantitative and qualitative research methods, tools, and protocols used. Othercomponents of the paper address questions that researchers and engineering faculty andadministrators might have regarding how to explore the findings and insights that are emergingfrom this extensive longitudinal and cross-sectional study of students’ pathways throughengineering. Research findings to date are summarized in a companion paper entitled Findingsfrom
own transformation. This wouldseem to make the necessity for successful assessment and CQI greater in education than anyother activity since the potential sources of failure are greater in education compared to theseother activities.Initial Planning Steps and Constraints on the ModelIn a typical engineering project, the initial steps include such items as a problem or visionstatement (what are we trying to accomplish), business case (why are we trying to develop thisprocess or product) and the specification of at least some of the product or process requirements(how do we know we have solved the problem adequately). In waterfall models, there is anattempt to specify the majority of requirements in advance of the design process whereasadaptive
relatively large margin.Master’s students are given the choice of pursuing a coursework, a special-research-project, or athesis curriculum. Most on-campus master’s students pursue a research-oriented curriculum.There is a fairly uniform distribution of tenure consisting of first-year, second-year, third-year,fourth-year, and fifth-plus-year students. There exists a variance in home country amongstudents, but the majority of students originate from the United States, South Korea, or Turkey. Page 11.130.3This program also has students from varied backgrounds; student undergraduate majors includeenvironmental engineering, chemical engineering, civil
to address thesetopics, and translates to career plans. To develop the survey, we drew from existing knowledge on topicsincluding belief about climate change (Leiserowitz et al., 2012), engineering course content andstandards (ABET, 2013; Allenby et al., 2009), sustainability (Davidson et al., 2007; Huntzinger et al.,2007; Mihelcic et al., 2006), critical engineering agency (Godwin et al., 2013; McNeill & Vaughn,2010), and career choice (Hazari et al., 2010; Kaminsky et al., 2012; Shealy et al., 2015). The surveywas model on prior national surveys such as Sustainability and Gender in Engineering (Klotz et al.,2010), the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (Leiserowitz et al., 2012; Leiserowitz et al.,2010) and the climate
Paper ID #19225The Development and Evaluation of Expert Witness Role Play Instruction forTeaching Engineering EthicsMs. Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and