Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[24] N. H. Choe, M. Borrego, L. L. Martins, A. D. Patrick, and C. C. Seepersad, “A quantitative pilot study of engineering graduate student identity,” presented at the 2017 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, Jan. 2017.[25] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes-Du, “Engineering identity development among pre-adolescent learners,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, Oct. 2012.[26] H. M. Matusovich, B. E. Barry, K. Meyers, and R. Louis, “A multi-institution comparison of students’ development of an identity as an engineer,” presented at the 2011 American Society of
between gender and/or ethno-racial identity and the stereotype ofengineering as a field appropriate for white males can impede the development of STEM identities amongwomen and minorities. With the increasing importance of innovation, students who pursue engineering graduate degreesoften seek to build skills in conducting research (Brown and Linden, 2008). The social psychologicalconstruct of identity has emerged as a relatively new metric for assessing graduate student retention andsuccess. Studies suggest that graduate students’ identities correlate with their competency levels as wellas their professional and academic motivation (Alexander, 2011; Silver, Garver, and Watkins, 2011;Virgil, 2016). Importantly however, the literature
have been calls to develop and deploy graduate STEM education modelsthat prepare students for careers outside academia. Few innovations have emerged to meet students attheir current skill and preparation levels when entering their graduate studies while also consideringstudents' individual desired career paths. The U.S.'s current approach to graduate STEM education doesnot emphasize preparing students with professional skills and experience outside the lab. Further,students from differing socioeconomic and underserved backgrounds are often not adequatelysupported. Through a National Science Foundation Innovations in Graduate Education (IGE) award, theUniversity of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering is creating and validating a
Paper ID #33746Critically Quantitative: Measuring Community Cultural Wealth on SurveysDaiki Hiramori, University of Washington Daiki Hiramori is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of Washington. His research interests include quantitative methodology, queer and feminist studies, sexuality and gender stratification, demography of sexual orientation and gender identity, and Japanese society. In addition to an MA in Sociology and a Graduate Certificate in Feminist Studies from the University of Washington, he holds a BA in Sociology with a minor
, workshop handout “A formula for motivation: M = E + V – C,” James Madison University, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/STEM15/EVC%20_formulaandsourceshand out%20AACU%20F15%20final%20version.pdf.[21] L. Eby, T. Allen, S. Evans, T. Ng, and D. DuBois, “Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 254–267, 2008.[22] C. Halupa and M. Henry, “Using VineUp to match students with alumni industry mentors in engineering: a pilot study,” International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 105-112, 2015.[23] M. Dagley, N. Ramlakhan, C. Young, and M
Paper ID #45261”Si no servimos, no servimos”: A Pilot Study on the Influence of PerceivedAdvisor Support on Graduate Student Thesis Self-EfficacyAbimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Abimelec Mercado Rivera is a Puerto Rican doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. Abimelec received his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez (UPRM) in 2016. After working in the aerospace industry, he returned to the UPRM for his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2017
biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Pilot Study of the Impacts of a Robotics Curriculum on Student’s Subject- related Identities and Understanding of EngineeringAbstractParticipation in educational robotics, tinkering, and making are common precursors to enrollment inengineering majors. Negative perceptions of robotics can inhibit some students from participating andlater, pursuing engineering studies. Additionally
design. Awareness of one’s own mental models and theissues that face the end systems user, particular when it may be a diverse population, will allowfor more universal design that does not continue to privilege the same populations andexacerbate the inequities of others [23]. Handley and Marnewick [24] augment an existingcompetency model that incorporates elements of global competencies to now include DEIprinciples. They apply it to a systems engineering graduate program and suggest modifyingmaterial content, student interactions (classroom activities) and the teaching environment(methods, practice and atmosphere) simultaneously. In this pilot study, a senior design project inIndustrial and Systems Engineering and a course in Systems Thinking
practiced professionally in some of Boston’s larger design firms. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pilot study: Impact of Social Consciousness on Engineering Design Decision MakingAbstractOne of the tasks of engineering design education is to ensure that students have a strongunderstanding of their customers and environments. They must understand the context of theirdecision-making and how it affects people in diverse communities. This requires students to seehow a design may be biased toward or against a particular population and to develop sensitivityabout issues of race, gender, religion, nationality, age, physical ability, and
Paper ID #25003Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. inLearning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning,and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Race, Veteran, and Engineering Identities among Black Male Student VeteransAbstractUsing interviews with seven Black Student Veterans in Engineering (BSVEs) at threepredominantly White institutions (PWIs), we explore how the identities of Black, Male, Veteran,and Engineering student are enacted during their undergraduate engineering experience. Weapproach this study informed by
convergent and divergent themes. In sum, these methods provided the opportunity to associate and compare the different definitions of success (e.g. graduating with a degree, Kate and Dan’s experiences, and engineering identity scores) with Kate and Dan’s experiences. First, the pilot student’s demographics are presented. Second, Kate and Dan’s grit and engineering identity scores (quantitative measures) are presented. Third, ‘other’ senior engineering students’ engineering identity scores reported in a cross-sectional study are described [15]. Fourth, Kate and Dan’s quantitative and qualitative measures are compared for the convergent and divergent themes. Last, the ways success is understood and seen by Dan and Kate
viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Ms. Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests
Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder be- longing and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chem- ical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. ©American Society for
Program for Post Graduate Studies in EngineeringAbstract - This paper describes a 5-year project in which we defined a gap in development ofprofessional skills in postgraduate engineering education, identified effective methods fordeveloping students’ professional skills, implemented a series of two required courses to developthem, and evaluated the effectiveness of the program. The courses content, assessments, teachingmethodologies, and outcomes are discussed in this paper. Our 5 years of program evaluation aresummarized. We describe how our program has been extended to multiple departments in thefaculty of engineering and evolved from the model of individual to joint classes and team-teaching. Finally, we discuss effectiveness of those modes
integrating gender equality issues within highereducation. In Chile, Ministry of Education Law No. 21.369 promotes the establishment of safeand inclusive environments for all members of higher education academic communities,irrespective of their sex, gender, identity, or sexual orientation. Numerous studies have revealedthat non-cognitive and affective factors significantly influence students' academic progress andsuccess. Therefore, it is essential to explore the perceptions and perspectives of students andfaculty in the School of Engineering regarding gender, equality, and roles. This pilot researchaims to delve into the views held by students and faculty members of a prominent EngineeringSchool in Chile concerning gender-related topics. The
Paper ID #43443Board 118: Mixing it Up: A Pilot Study on the Experiences of Mixed-RaceAsian-American Students in EngineeringMs. Michelle Choi Ausman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Choi Ausman is a second-year PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received a BS in Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, and an MS in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Her research interests include engineering identity; inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility; Asian American Studies; Critical Mixed Race Studies
ofstudents from underrepresented populations, such as women of color and members of theLGBTQIA+ community, through degree completion. Using an intersectional approach, wedeveloped a scale to assess multiple climate factors associated with organizational commitmentor member retention, many of which are particularly salient to the experiences of students frommarginalized or minoritized identities. We took several steps to create the scale, includingface/content validity analysis, exploratory factor analyses for validity evidence, and internalconsistency for reliability evidence. The survey also includes demographic items to capture therespondents’ complex social identities. During the summer and fall of 2023, we collected ourfirst pilot study data of
development.Preliminary results indicate that students differentiate between researcher, scientist, and engineeridentities qualitatively and quantitatively, but that these identities are separate from the salientidentity activated when completing student-type tasks. As such, items developed in this work canbe used to craft a framework for understanding graduate student experiences, but futurerefinement may be necessary to fully capture students’ transitions from undergraduate tograduate education. While the results of this study speak to graduate students holistically, furtherwork is needed to understand how the different sub-populations (e.g., underrepresentedminorities, international students) that exist within engineering graduate programs experiencegraduate
in academia and research, broaden my knowledge base, engage in evidence-based practices to promote the quality of life, and ultimately be an avid contributor to the world of academia through research, peer reviews, and publications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within an Experience as a Woman in EngineeringAbstract: This research paper presents the findings of an interpretative phenomenologicalanalysis (IPA) case study of the experience of shame in a woman engineering student. Ouroverarching research question that framed this study was: How do woman students with multiplesalient identities
best answer their research question, hypothesis, orpurpose of the study [1]. A mixed methods research methodology that a researcher may select isQ methodology. Q methodology is a social science research methodology focused onsystematically studying subjectivity utilizing both qualitative and quantitative researchtechniques [2]–[6]. While Q methodology has had limited use in engineering education research,it has been used in studies regarding the career paths of engineering education doctoral graduates[7], competencies for nanotechnology [8] and IT [9], curriculum design for information systems[10], construction engineering technology program assessment [11], and undergraduateengineering students’ out-of-class activities [12]. However, Q
has served as PI/Co-PI on multiple educational projects sponsored by NSF programs including NSF S-STEM, NSF GK-12, and NSF TUES.Dr. Jianyu ”Jane” Dong, California State University, Los Angeles Jianyu Dong is a professor in electrical and computer engineering and currently serves as the Associate Dean for the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology at Cal State LA. Her area of expertise is video compression/communication, multimedia networks, QoS, etc. With a strong passion in Engineering Education, she has been engaged in multiple funded projects and initiatives to increase the participation and success of students from undeserved, low-income communities in engineering areas.matthew jackson PhD
Engineering IdentityAbstractThis paper is a work in progress (WIP) for an NSF project that explores first-generation students(FGS) in engineering technology (ET); specifically, their academic performance, engineeringidentity development, and use of social capital all compared to continuing generation students(CGS) peers. Despite the growing number of engineering technology degrees awarded annually,there is a scarcity of research focusing on the acquisition of engineering identity, particularlyamong FG students. Overall, this project will utilize a two phase, mixed methods approach. Inthe first phase, we will quantitatively assess academic performance comparisons between firstgeneration and continuing generation engineering students and utilize the
, 2016. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552115617018[24] M. Laugerman, D. T. Rover, M. C. Shelley, and S. K. Mickelson, "Determining Graduation Rates inEngineering for Community College Transfer Students Using Data Mining", Iowa State University, 2015.[Online]. Available: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/pols_pubs[25] A. L. Zuckerman and S. M. Lo, "Transfer student experiences and identity navigation in STEM:Overlapping figured worlds of success", CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 20, ar48, pp. 1-24, 2021.[26] M. T. Gibbons et al., "Results from a pilot survey of engineering and engineering technologystudents in 2-year and 4-year institutions", in Proc. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., pp. T1J-1,2011. [Online]. Available: https
participation for women.MethodsThis work presented here is part of a larger mixed-methods study, employing an exploratorysequential study design: first, qualitative data were collected and analyzed, which then informedthe development of a survey to collect quantitative data [5].Qualitative Interview AnalysisAs part of the qualitative study [4], fifteen interviews were conducted with female students,prompting them to reflect on their team project in their first-year engineering course and discusswhat contributed to their satisfaction, or dissatisfaction, with their team experience. Studentswere asked to describe their team project; discuss which tasks they performed in the project andwhether there were any tasks they wished they did more or less of; and
& Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 181–200, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1648269.[13] N. Choe, M. Borrego, L. Martins, A. Patrick, and C. C. Seepersad, “A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017, p. 27502. doi: 10.18260/1-2--27502.[14] C. J. Faber, R. L. Kajfez, D. M. Lee, L. C. Benson, M. S. Kennedy, and E. G. Creamer, “A grounded theory model of the dynamics of undergraduate engineering students’ researcher identity and epistemic thinking,” J Res Sci Teach, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 529–560, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1002/tea.21736.[15] L. Fleming, K. Smith, D. Williams, and L. Bliss, “Engineering
attitudinal profiles.This mixed methods study investigates the intersectionality of engineering students' personalidentities to understand: How do non-normative groups in engineering form an engineeringidentity and navigate a culture dominated by limited diversity?The focus of this paper is on the first phase this project, in which students' identities, motivation,psychological traits, perceived supports and barriers to engineering, and other backgroundinformation is quantitatively assessed. Pilot survey data were collected from participants enrolledin second semester, first-year engineering programs across three institutions (n = 371). We usedtopological data analysis (TDA) to create normative and non-normative attitudinal profiles ofrespondents. As
, their education, and their profession, and how experiences uniquely affectunderrepresented or marginalized students. Researchers have suggested that culture is especiallyimportant for women to persist in a field [23], [30]. A culture of “Engineering with Engineers”could result in graduates who not only are prepared technically and professionally with apractical, realistic understanding of what it is to be an engineer, but who also identify with andare committed to the engineering profession. Hence, results of the study are hoped to lead to aclearer understanding of the changes that promote engineering identities, particularly in women,and how such identities affect students’ sense of belonging in a program and their persistence inthe major.It
.1742-1241.2011.02659.x.[8] S. M. Van Anders, “Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors,” Sex Roles, vol. 51, no. 9–10, pp. 511–521, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1007/S11199-004-5461-9/METRICS.[9] R. Ysseldyk et al., “A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. JUN, p. 1297, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2019.01297/BIBTEX.[10] N. D. Jackson, K. I. Tyler, Y. Li, W. T. Chen, C. Liu, and R. Bhargava, “Keeping current: An update on the structure and evaluation of a program for graduate women interested in engineering Academia,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
of growth mindsets than their White peers,yet they also reported lower levels of fixed mindsets [13]. Said differently, Ge et al.’s [13] cross-sectional study showed that White engineering students demonstrate a higher predispositiontowards a growth mindset and a higher predisposition towards endorsing a fixed view of theirabilities. An exploratory study aimed at understanding the relationship between students’engineering identity and mindsets longitudinally found that both a fixed and a growth mindsetwere positive predictors of identity [14]. However, the authors did acknowledge that there may bemoderating effects not considered in the model, such as course difficulty, that may also helpexplain the positive relationships [14]. The studies
seek through our work overall isthe enhancement of both students’ and faculty’s capacities to engage issues of inclusivity, equityand social justice. Towards this end, we aspire to shift School community members’ cognitiveand affective knowledge of power and privilege. While there are quantitative assessment toolsthat measure related constructs (e.g. cultural competencies), we are not aware of any instrumentsthat measure a person’s understanding of social power and oppression, particularly how sociallyconstructed differences and identities like gender, race, and class intersect and combine to affectpeople’s lives in various settings. Our research team is in the early stages of constructing such aninstrument, and will begin piloting it soon to