Asee peer logo

Assessing Student Responses to the Potential Conflict between Safety and Welfare in the American Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics

Download Paper |

Conference

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Tampa, Florida

Publication Date

June 15, 2019

Start Date

June 15, 2019

End Date

June 19, 2019

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Assessment

Tagged Division

Engineering Ethics

Page Count

15

DOI

10.18260/1-2--32117

Permanent URL

https://cms.jee.org/32117

Download Count

49

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Matthew Sleep P.E. Oregon Institute of Technology

visit author page

Matthew Sleep is an associate professor of civil engineering at Oregon Institute of Technology. Prior to Oregon Tech, Matthew received his PhD at Virginia Tech researching slope stability, levees, transient seepage and reliability. Matthew is from Nashville, TN and has worked for the United States Army Corps of Engineers and private consulting. He currently teaches and continues research on reliability and transient seepage.

visit author page

author page

Yasha Rohwer Oregon Tech

Download Paper |

Abstract

The first canon of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) code of ethics states that “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public…” While it may seem that safety, health, and welfare are all complimentary to one another, we argue that there are situations where trade-offs exist between these important obligations of civil engineers. Our focus in this paper is on the tension between safety and welfare. Safety can be quite costly and that high cost can affect the welfare of an engineer’s client—especially if that client is poor. Given this trade-off, we surveyed engineering students on how they would apply the code of ethics when navigating two hypothetical cases involving helical piles (foundation systems), which nicely illustrate this tension. In one hypothetical situation the client is quite wealthy, in the other the client is poor. Half of the students were first asked to review the code of ethics’ first canon. Comparing student responses will help us understand the extent to which students consider their code of ethics when approaching a new project, and how they navigate the tension between welfare and safety.

Sleep, M., & Rohwer, Y. (2019, June), Assessing Student Responses to the Potential Conflict between Safety and Welfare in the American Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32117

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015