Asee peer logo

Board # 13 : Examining engineering concepts in practice: Is conceptual understanding relevant to practice?

Download Paper |


2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Topic

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Shane A. Brown P.E. Oregon State University Orcid 16x16

visit author page

Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.

visit author page


Matthew Stephen Barner Oregon State University Orcid 16x16

visit author page

M.S. student at Oregon State University working under Dr. Shane Brown.

Research interests include: engineering education, diffusions of innovation, concerns-based adoption model, conceptual change theory, and earthquake engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper |


Concepts are ubiquitous in engineering education in many forms. Concepts at their core definition imply a sanitized transferable entity, that transcends context. However, theoretical perspectives of situated cognition suggest that concepts may not be the fundamental organizing schema for practitioners. Rather, project constraints and contexts may be an alternative lens for how engineers organize their knowledge. Engineering educators have developed multiple concept inventories that are widely used to assess student learning and frequently have discussions about the importance of knowing the concepts. Academic artifacts such as textbooks are normally organized around engineering concepts. Although there is comfort in utilizing concepts as the organizing framework for engineering education, substantial evidence from multiple perspectives suggests that it may not be optimal for student learning or for preparation for engineering practice. This research implemented two methodologies to examine the role of concepts in engineering practice. In the first approach, concept inventory responses from practicing civil engineers were gathered and compared to student responses. Students performed better than practicing engineers on statics, fluid mechanics, and mechanics of materials concept inventory questions. In the second approach, the use of concepts in the design of a roundabout in civil engineering practice was studied. Concepts in engineering practice related to roundabout design do not have static abstracted representations, but are continuously negotiated, abstracted, and represented in multiple forms. Results suggest that explicit and implicit organization of concepts in engineering education may not be ideal for learning or preparation for the engineering workplace.

Brown, S. A., & Barner, M. S. (2017, June), Board # 13 : Examining engineering concepts in practice: Is conceptual understanding relevant to practice? Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--27728

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015