Grohs, J. R., & Knight, D. B., & Soledad, M., & Murzi, H., & Smith, N. (2019, June), Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32392

\bibitem{asee_peer_32392}
  Grohs, J. R., \& Knight, D. B., \& Soledad, M., \& Murzi, H., \& Smith, N. (2019, June), \emph{Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--32392

Jacob R. Grohs, David B. Knight, Michelle Soledad, Homero Murzi, and Natasha Smith.  "Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/32392 Internet.  24 May, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_32392}
  Jacob R. Grohs, David B. Knight, Michelle Soledad, Homero Murzi, and Natasha Smith.
  "Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/32392 Internet.  24 May, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_32392
author = "Jacob R. Grohs, David B. Knight, Michelle Soledad, Homero Murzi, and Natasha Smith"
title = "Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/32392}
number = {10.18260/1-2--32392}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Foundational engineering courses are critical to student success in engineering programs. The conceptually challenging content of these courses establishes the requisite knowledge for future classes.  Thus, it is no surprise that such courses can serve as barriers or gatekeepers to successful student progress through the undergraduate curriculum. Although the difficulty of the courses may be necessary, often other features of the course delivery such as large class environments or a few very high-stakes assessments can further exacerbate these challenges.  And especially problematic, past studies have shown that grade penalties associated with these courses and environments may disproportionately impact women.  On the faculty side, institutions often turn to non-tenure track instructional faculty to teach multiple sections of foundational courses each semester. Although having faculty whose sole role is dedicated to quality teaching is an asset, benefits would likely be maximized when such faculty have clear metrics for paths to promotion, some autonomy and ownership regarding the curriculum, and overall job satisfaction. However, literature suggests that faculty, like students, note ill effects from large classes, such as challenges connecting and building rapport with students and having time to offer individualized feedback to students.

Our NSF IUSE project focuses on instructors of large foundational engineering students with the belief that by better understanding the educational environment from their perspective we can improve the quality of the teaching and learning environment for all engineering students.  Our project regularly convenes faculty teaching an array of core courses (e.g,. Mathematics, Chemistry, Mechanics, Physics) and uses insights from these meetings and individual interviews to identify possible leverage points where our project or the institution more broadly might affect change.  Parallel to this effort, we have been working with data stewards on campus to gain access to institutional data (e.g., student course and grade histories, student evaluations of faculty teaching) to link and provide aggregate deidentified results to faculty to feed more information in to their decision-making.  

We are demonstrating that regular engagement between faculty and institutional leaders around analyzed and curated data is essential to continuous and systematic improvement. Efforts to date have included building an institutional data explorer dashboard (e.g., influences of pre-requisite courses on future courses) and drafting reports to be sent to department heads and associate deans which gather priorities identified in the first year of our research. For example, participating instructors identified that clarity of promotion paths across non-tenure track teaching faculty from different departments varied greatly, and the institution as a whole could benefit from clarified university-wide guidance.  While some findings may be institution-specific (NSF IUSE Institutional Transformation track), as a large public research institution, peer-institutions with high engineering enrollments often face similar challenges and so findings from our change efforts potentially have broad applicability.

AU  - Jacob R. Grohs
AU  - David B. Knight
AU  - Michelle Soledad
AU  - Homero Murzi
AU  - Natasha Smith
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Board 62: Institutional Change Efforts to Improve the Environment for Both Instructors and Students in Foundational Engineering Courses
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/32392
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--32392
ER  -