Asee peer logo

Designing A Pumping System: Why Worry About Other Process Elements?

Download Paper |

Conference

1997 Annual Conference

Location

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Publication Date

June 15, 1997

Start Date

June 15, 1997

End Date

June 18, 1997

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

5

Page Numbers

2.139.1 - 2.139.5

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/6501

Download Count

23

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Douglas E. Hirt

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 1613

Session 1613

DESIGNING A PUMPING SYSTEM: WHY WORRY ABOUT OTHER PROCESS ELEMENTS? Douglas E. Hirt Department of Chemical Engineering Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634-0909

Abstract

A major goal in integrating design throughout a curriculum is to show students how the major elements of the curriculum fit together. Vertical integration is accomplished by building on concepts learned in previous courses, reinforcing concepts currently being learned, and looking ahead to future material. The process described here is an open-ended design project that is assigned in a junior-level course on fluid flow and heat transfer. In the process, cooling water is pumped from a river, through a condenser on a distillation column, and then to a cooling tower. The students' job is to select the most cost-effective pump and piping for this flow system. This project involves teamwork, decision-making, and the use of spreadsheets, and along the way the students gain a little knowledge about economics. The students also begin to take a broader view of design. Rather than focusing solely on the pump, they realize that the presence of process elements upstream and downstream from the pump can significantly affect their design.

Introduction

One of the best ways for students to learn new material is to have them work on limited, but meaningful, open-ended design projects. To be worthwhile, a project should incorporate several aspects of the lecture material so that students can integrate many of these concepts in an activity. Also, contrary to a capstone design experience, a project should be able to be completed in a week or two so that the students do not get consumed by the project and fall behind in the course (i.e., lecturing is still continuing while they work on their project and the lecturing may be on new material that could be unrelated to the project).

Projects of this type have been used successfully in our department in several courses with the objective of extending the design experience over a major portion of the curriculum. The type of project described here has been used for many years in a junior-level unit operations course, which primarily addresses fluid flow and heat transfer. The process that is evaluated is shown in Figure 1 where a pump is used to convey water from a river, through a heat exchanger, to a cooling tower. The objective is for the students to choose the "best" pumping system for the process based on their engineering calculations and judgment.

Hirt, D. E. (1997, June), Designing A Pumping System: Why Worry About Other Process Elements? Paper presented at 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. https://peer.asee.org/6501

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1997 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015