June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.492.1 - 10.492.9
Drawing Valid Inferences from the Nested Structure of Engineering Education Data: Application of a Hierarchical Linear Model to the SUCCEED Longitudinal Database
Miguel A. Padilla, Guili Zhang, and Timothy J. Anderson Educational Psychology and Chemical Engineering, University of Florida
Matthew W. Ohland, General Engineering, Clemson University
Although hierarchical linear models are seldom used in engineering educational research, the nested structure of students in various colleges of engineering and the longitudinal nature of student records supports the use of such models. Hierarchical linear models account for the nested structure and can test hypotheses on both the schools and the students within the schools simultaneously, thereby eliminating aggregation bias and misestimated standard errors that result when the nested structure is ignored. In the present study, a hierarchical linear model is fitted to the SUCCEED longitudinal database using only students that graduated. As an example, cumulative GPA is regressed on Carnegie school classification, school setting, degree received, gender gap, and citizenship gap with SAT total score and number of terms attended as covariates. The results indicate that there is significant cumulative GPA variance between schools, accounting for 19% of the variance. Additionally, the gender gap and citizenship gap accounted for 6% of the within school cumulative GPA variance, but school setting accounted for 61% of the between school citizenship gap variance. In particular, students that receive their degree in engineering had the highest cumulative GPA. Non-citizens tended to have higher cumulative GPAs than citizens. Another finding is total SAT score is more predictive of cumulative GPA in urban schools than suburban schools. Finally, urban and/or research schools had the strongest relationship between number of terms until graduation with cumulative GPA in that longer times to graduation are associated with lower cumulative GPA.
The Southeastern University and College Coalition for Engineering EDucation (SUCCEED) compiled a student database to help evaluate the impact of its various experiments in undergraduate engineering education. This comprehensive longitudinal database contains the academic records of all students enrolled in the nine SUCCEED universities during the period 1987 to 2002. The extent of the database in terms of the number of students, length of time, and number of universities enables the exploration of a variety of educational questions with statistical significance. Perhaps the most important use of such an extensive database is to understand the relationship between a specific outcome (e.g. cumulative GPA) on various factors (e.g., preparation – SAT scores, gender, discipline).
For purposes of quantitative analysis and generalizability, it is common to represent this relationship with a mathematical model, with linear models being most common. It is important to realize, however, that the data in the SUCCEED database does not result from an experimental design. That is to say, students were not randomly selected from the population and then
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
Padilla, M. A., & Anderson, T. J., & Ohland, M., & Zhang, G. (2005, June), Drawing Valid Inferences From The Nested Structure Of Engineering Education Data: Application Of A Hierarchical Linear Model To The Succeed Longitudinal Database Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/14944
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015