July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
This study investigates retracted publications in the engineering literature to identify the most common reasons for retraction. The results of this study provide a better understanding of the scholarly communications landscape in engineering and will be of particular interest to educators teaching scholarly communications practices to engineering graduate students by illustrating the common mistakes found in the engineering literature. We used Elsevier’s Scopus abstract and citation database to collect engineering publications marked as “retracted articles” as of November 2019. We found that the most common reasons for retraction were plagiarism and authorship issues, while copyright infringement, errors, and lack of reproducible results were less common. These results will help librarians understand the common reasons for retraction, and identify topics that need to be addressed in instruction settings.
Solomon, D., & Heckman, C. (2021, July), Engineering Literature Retractions: Applications to Scholarly Communications Training Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37068
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015