New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Women in Engineering
Diversity and ASEE Diversity Committee
Despite efforts to broaden the participation of students pursuing and persisting in engineering, recruitment and retention problems still continue in engineering. One area of focus in recent years is exploring engineering students’ identity. In studying identity, though, it is important to recognize that engineering students have her/his own personality too (i.e. personal identity). In this study, students’ engineering identity and personality authenticity are explored in relation to female students’ persistence in engineering, with the grounding hypothesis being that female students who display a similar “authentic” personality in social contexts and engineering contexts are more likely to persist in engineering. The research questions guiding this effort are: (1) What personality profiles are freshmen and senior engineering students displaying in engineering environments? (2) What variations in personality and authenticity are present among engineering students in engineering and non-engineering environments? (3) How do engineering students varying in personality and authenticity among different environments respond to persistence in engineering?
In this exploratory study, we investigate the cross-group differences (male vs female) and within-group differences to better understand how female engineering students might differ amongst themselves. Our research team developed a survey that includes items from the Big Five Personality model, Engineering Identity Survey (EIS), personality authenticity items, and a few open-ended questions. Although the Big Five model does not fully represent the variance in personalities and identity that occurs in different environments, comparing the variance between students’ personality and identity in engineering and non-engineering environments help explain a holistic sense of oneself. Descriptive statistics will be used to present engineering students’ personality profiles, engineering identity salience, personality authenticity, and cross-role variance. This work is another step to understanding students’ identity in engineering beyond gender differences. Understanding engineering student identity will help forward strategies and research towards increasing retention in engineering programs.
Stoup, K. D., & Pierrakos, O. (2016, June), Engineering Students’ Self-Concept Differentiation: Investigation of Identity, Personality, and Authenticity with Implications for Program Retention Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26666
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015