Equitable Access to Majors through Removal of Competitive Application Process (CAPS) within a First-Year Engineering Program

Lisa Lampe; Lloyd R. Harriott; Sarah Schultz Robinson

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Equity, Inclusion, and Access
Tagged Division: First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/47329

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Lisa Lampe University of Virginia

visit author page

Dr. Lisa Lampe is the Assistant Dean of Undergraduate Affairs in the University of Virginia's School of Engineering and Applied Science, joining the school in January 2014. Prior to that, she served in many roles that bridge student affairs and academic affairs in public and private higher education institutions. Her research focuses on environmental factors which contribute to equitable student success outcomes and structures which improve the undergraduate experience.

visit author page

biography

Lloyd R. Harriott University of Virginia

visit author page

Dr. Harriott is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education and the Virginia Microelectronics Consortium Professor in The Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univers

visit author page

author page

Sarah Schultz Robinson University of Virginia

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

This full paper examined the outcomes of a policy-based factor in a student’s ability to declare their first-choice major in engineering after matriculating to a university. Declaring an engineering major is a life-changing event for many undergraduates. Within engineering major research, there is a plethora of research focused on student motivation to increase choice and persistence into engineering schools (i.e. pre-matriculation factors) and less focusing on post-matriculation factors such as competitive application processes (CAPS). At the University of Virginia’s (UVA) School of Engineering and Applied Science, we found students in minoritized groups were more adversely affected by major CAPS. This engineering program, starting with the entering class of 2016, shifted from CAPS to a major declaration process. This shift enabled students to pursue their first-choice major and resulted in an increase in equity. In UVA’s 2018 Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey, significantly more African American or Black students (31%) said they could not major in their first choice major when compared to Asian (3%) or White (4%) students. Two years later in 2020, that significant difference was eliminated. We attribute the elimination of difference to the removal CAPS and an increase in holistic student support personal in spring 2017. All engineering students responding to the 2020 survey had the chance to declare their engineering major. Removal of CAPS likely enabled students to pursue their first-choice major and resulted in an increase in equitable access. A preliminary examination of retention data indicated a small improvement in percentage of Black or African American entering engineering undergraduate retention and no change in other ethnic groups. Ultimately, the engineering program shifted from asking departments how many students they could take to asking what resources departments needed to take all the students who were interested in their majors. We explained key players to remove CAPS and the resource reallocation to make declaration possible at the departmental level. One recommendation was engineering program policy decision makers at research universities look at their SERU data, identify inequity in access to first-choice major, and remove any policy barriers and increase resource and supports for engineering students to pursue their interests.

Citation
Format

Lampe, L., & Harriott, L. R., & Schultz Robinson, S. (2024, June), Equitable Access to Majors through Removal of Competitive Application Process (CAPS) within a First-Year Engineering Program Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/47329

TY - CPAPER
AB - This full paper examined the outcomes of a policy-based factor in a student’s ability to declare their first-choice major in engineering after matriculating to a university. Declaring an engineering major is a life-changing event for many undergraduates. Within engineering major research, there is a plethora of research focused on student motivation to increase choice and persistence into engineering schools (i.e. pre-matriculation factors) and less focusing on post-matriculation factors such as competitive application processes (CAPS).
At the University of Virginia’s (UVA) School of Engineering and Applied Science, we found students in minoritized groups were more adversely affected by major CAPS. This engineering program, starting with the entering class of 2016, shifted from CAPS to a major declaration process. This shift enabled students to pursue their first-choice major and resulted in an increase in equity. In UVA’s 2018 Student Experience in the Research University (SERU) survey, significantly more African American or Black students (31%) said they could not major in their first choice major when compared to Asian (3%) or White (4%) students. Two years later in 2020, that significant difference was eliminated. We attribute the elimination of difference to the removal CAPS and an increase in holistic student support personal in spring 2017. All engineering students responding to the 2020 survey had the chance to declare their engineering major. Removal of CAPS likely enabled students to pursue their first-choice major and resulted in an increase in equitable access. A preliminary examination of retention data indicated a small improvement in percentage of Black or African American entering engineering undergraduate retention and no change in other ethnic groups.
Ultimately, the engineering program shifted from asking departments how many students they could take to asking what resources departments needed to take all the students who were interested in their majors. We explained key players to remove CAPS and the resource reallocation to make declaration possible at the departmental level. One recommendation was engineering program policy decision makers at research universities look at their SERU data, identify inequity in access to first-choice major, and remove any policy barriers and increase resource and supports for engineering students to pursue their interests.
AU - Lisa Lampe
AU - Lloyd R. Harriott
AU - Sarah Schultz Robinson
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Equitable Access to Majors through Removal of Competitive Application Process (CAPS) within a First-Year Engineering Program
UR - https://peer.asee.org/47329
ER -