Evaluating Students’ Belonging in Two Engineering Departments

Susan P. Gentry; Glaucia Prado

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: June 26, 2024
Conference Session: WIP: Student Success and Sustainability
Tagged Division: Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 8
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--47346
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/47346
Download Count: 98

Paper Authors

biography

Susan P. Gentry University of California, Davis orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-8818

visit author page

Prof. Susan P. Gentry is an Associate Professor of Teaching Materials Science and Engineering at the University of California, Davis. In her current position at UC Davis, she is interested in student well-being and alternative grading schemes.

visit author page

biography

Glaucia Prado P.E. University of California, Davis orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-5913

visit author page

Glaucia Prado is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Chemical Engineering at University of California Davis. She began her career in food engineering from the University of Campinas (Brazil) before earning a PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Alberta. She teaches a variety of courses such as thermodynamics and senior kinetics lab and developed a new food engineering elective course for chemical engineering students that consists in applying engineering concepts in the context of food processing. Her research interests include students' wellness, scientific history, inclusive teaching, and food engineering. She is currently piloting a new class that focus on student's well being and success, community building, and providing academic support for chemical engineering courses.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Many educators feel a moral imperative to support students from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. However, students may have different perceptions of the culture of their department or university as welcoming or belonging. For instance, perceptions of hidden curriculum (the attitudes as to who belongs in engineering) vary based on race; people of color are more likely to classify hidden curriculum as active rather than passive, as compared to their white peers. Furthermore, students’ perceptions of belonging are linked to their academic success and mental well-being. Literature reports that the major causes for success, intent to persist in college, personal growth, motivation, and degree plans are faculty-student interaction outside of the classroom, involvement with campus activities, cultural and ethnicity representation, and building strong connections with peers. Furthermore, department caring and pride were shown to be negatively correlated with stress, anxiety, and depression of engineering students, while department diversity is negatively correlated with anxiety and depression for female engineering students but not for male engineering students. Supporting individual members requires an understanding of organizational culture, as leadership theory links the norms of a group to individual behavior.

This project investigates students’ perceptions of belonging in two engineering departments at a large research institution. Both authors have developed seminars on personal wellness and academic strategies to support students. These seminars are offered exclusively to undergraduate students in the instructor’s engineering department to promote student well-being and inter-department interactions. We surveyed students in both departments using the Engineering Department Inclusion Level Survey (EDIL), which includes information on department caring, diversity, and pride. There were no significant differences between the departments on the composite scores, but the responses to individual questions provide insight into students’ perceptions of the programs. Additionally, we found no significant effect of the seminars on students’ belonging, although the significance of those results is limited due to possible confounding factors. The results of these findings are shared, along with a discussion of future work among the entire College of Engineering.

Citation
Format

Gentry, S. P., & Prado, G. (2024, June), Evaluating Students’ Belonging in Two Engineering Departments Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47346

TY - CPAPER
AB - Many educators feel a moral imperative to support students from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. However, students may have different perceptions of the culture of their department or university as welcoming or belonging. For instance, perceptions of hidden curriculum (the attitudes as to who belongs in engineering) vary based on race; people of color are more likely to classify hidden curriculum as active rather than passive, as compared to their white peers. Furthermore, students’ perceptions of belonging are linked to their academic success and mental well-being. Literature reports that the major causes for success, intent to persist in college, personal growth, motivation, and degree plans are faculty-student interaction outside of the classroom, involvement with campus activities, cultural and ethnicity representation, and building strong connections with peers. Furthermore, department caring and pride were shown to be negatively correlated with stress, anxiety, and depression of engineering students, while department diversity is negatively correlated with anxiety and depression for female engineering students but not for male engineering students. Supporting individual members requires an understanding of organizational culture, as leadership theory links the norms of a group to individual behavior.

This project investigates students’ perceptions of belonging in two engineering departments at a large research institution. Both authors have developed seminars on personal wellness and academic strategies to support students. These seminars are offered exclusively to undergraduate students in the instructor’s engineering department to promote student well-being and inter-department interactions. We surveyed students in both departments using the Engineering Department Inclusion Level Survey (EDIL), which includes information on department caring, diversity, and pride. There were no significant differences between the departments on the composite scores, but the responses to individual questions provide insight into students’ perceptions of the programs. Additionally, we found no significant effect of the seminars on students’ belonging, although the significance of those results is limited due to possible confounding factors. The results of these findings are shared, along with a discussion of future work among the entire College of Engineering.
AU - Susan P. Gentry
AU - Glaucia Prado P.E.
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Evaluating Students’ Belonging in Two Engineering Departments
UR - https://peer.asee.org/47346
DO - 10.18260/1-2--47346
ER -