New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
Exploring ABET Self-Studies: A Look at Pedagogy, Assessment, and Evaluation of Life-Long Learning
It is a continuous need to develop and improve engineering curricula that prepare engineering graduates for the increasingly global, social, and complex challenges of society. In the mid 1990s, the engineering accreditation agency ABET identified 11 student outcomes (a)–(k) (Criterion 3) that programs were required to develop in their students. However, while much work has been done in the area of student outcomes, curriculum challenges remain for educators and administrators due to the inherent difficulty in defining, observing, and assessing these outcomes in students. Given the driving force that accreditation plays in curriculum development, educators are challenged to consider how curriculum design at a program level may support the planning, assessment, pedagogy, and evaluation of student outcomes.
To answer this challenge, this project seeks to understand how engineering programs address student outcome (i), stated as “a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning”, in their ABET self-study curriculum documents. Outcome (i) was chosen for this study due to the recent outcome changes proposed by ABET which entirely omit the phrase, “life-long learning.”
In this research, a number of publicly available ABET self-studies from mechanical engineering programs were reviewed using qualitative content analysis approaches. Grounded by a curriculum design framework, all documents were coded by two independent researchers and discussed until consensus was reached. The study is an exploration into the perspectives and approaches presented by a variety of programs in order to better understand the landscape of practices associated with ABET outcome (i). We propose a Curriculum-Outcomes matrix that organizes the findings into three observed dimensions of outcome (i) (Perceptions, Abilities, and Behaviors) across four curriculum design elements (Description, Assessment, Pedagogy, and Evaluation). Using this approach, individual programs may further develop their own understanding and practices to meet their program needs, and self-assess their program for curriculum alignment.
Hicks, N. M., & Aleong, R. J. (2016, June), Exploring ABET Self-Studies: A Look at Pedagogy, Assessment, and Evaluation of Life-Long Learning Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26841
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015