Tingerthal, J., & Bruner, R., & Francis, A. M. (2015, June), Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24319

\bibitem{asee_peer_24319}
  Tingerthal, J., \& Bruner, R., \& Francis, A. M. (2015, June), \emph{Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned}
  Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington.
  10.18260/p.24319

John Tingerthal, Robert Bruner, and Alan Merrill Francis.  "Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned".  2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2015.  https://peer.asee.org/24319 Internet.  24 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_24319}
  John Tingerthal, Robert Bruner, and Alan Merrill Francis.
  "Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned".
  \emph{2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Seattle, Washington, 2015, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2015.
  https://peer.asee.org/24319 Internet.  24 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_24319
author = "John Tingerthal, Robert Bruner, and Alan Merrill Francis"
title = "Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned"
booktitle = "2015 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2015"
month = "June"
address = "Seattle, Washington"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/24319}
number = {10.18260/p.24319}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Integrated Construction Laboratory - LessonsLearnedSunday, October 19, 2014   5:01 PMIn 2012, faculty at xxx University re-designed the Construction Management (CM) curriculum bydisconnecting topic-specific laboratories from associated lectures and forming a single integrated laboratoryto provide students with experiences in the context of a construction project. In addition to merging thetopic-specific content, the laboratory is co-convened among sophomore, junior and senior levels to allow forintegration of the additional dimensions of design and project management. Thus, the resulting laboratory isboth horizontally (among topics) and vertically (among roles) integrated. Now, after four complete semestersof implementation, graduates of the CM program have now experienced the complete cycle of the laboratory.This paper will address two questions: What are the experiences of CM students in the laboratory, and howhas the laboratory curriculum developed over time. Preliminary data indicates that the student experiencehas been positive, however the resources required to administer the laboratory are more extensive thanoriginally expected. Based on our findings, we will present a summary section on lessons learned, costsassociated with the laboratory and recommendations for replication at other institutions.                                     ASC2015 Page 1
AU  - John Tingerthal
AU  - Robert Bruner
AU  - Alan Merrill Francis
CY  - Seattle, Washington
DA  - 2015/06/14
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons Learned
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/24319
DO  - 10.18260/p.24319
ER  -