Seattle, Washington
June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
978-0-692-50180-1
2153-5965
Systems Engineering
9
26.1086.1 - 26.1086.9
10.18260/p.24423
https://peer.asee.org/24423
497
Biography
Dr. Jose Garcia has been involved in several local and statewide recruitment events, where he was able to develop short workshops in fluid power and STEM. He is also working on the development of a new generation of hydraulic components and systems that can operate using environmentally friendlier fluids. Dr. Garcia has plans to actively continue the development of practical teaching tools that bring industry applications to the classroom.
Rick Homkes is an associate professor of Computer & Information Technology at the Purdue College of Technology. He has also worked many years in industry, including as a software engineer for embedded systems.
Mark Carnes is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) and is currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology at Purdue University. He is also nearing completion of studies for a doctorate in Engineering Education, also at Purdue. Before coming to Purdue, he spent over 30 years as an electronics designer of control and power conversion circuits. He received an MS from the University of Michigan (1982) and a BS from the University of Notre Dame (1975), both in Electrical Engineering. His current research interests are in the areas of conceptual understanding and mental modeling among engineering students. In addition to his teaching responsibilities, he is also the coach of the Purdue-Kokomo Robotic Football Team.
Kevin Taylor is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. In 2009-2010 he served as the Chair of the Executive Committee of the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC) of ABET and continues his work with ABET as a consultant. He is a Senior Member of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), and a member of the Society of Automotive (SAE). Kevin is the Affiliate Director for Project Lead the Way® (PLTW) at Purdue, a program that focuses on introducing engineering concepts in middle and high schools in the United States.
Lessons learned from team-‐teaching a PBL robotics course with multi-‐disciplinary instructors and students. A group of nine upper classmen undergraduate technology students were enrolled in a Design of Robotic Systems class in the fall of 2014. This class was co-‐taught by professors from the mechanical engineering technology (MET), electrical engineering technology (EET) and the computer and information technology (CIT) programs at X University. The goal of this paper is to document the activities carried out during the semester the class was taught and present the lessons learned from teaching students with the diverse backgrounds in MET, EET and CIT. The objective of the course was to provide a project based learning (PBL) experience to the students taking the class. In the class the students were tasked to specify and design sub-‐systems for prototype robots. During the semester, the students attended lectures and labs that were heavily focused on hands-‐on activities relevant to design of those sub-‐systems. Interdisciplinary student teams were introduced early in the semester so that the requirements specification and design processes would have multiple views. The initial portion of the course focused on topics related to team management, the design process and modeling and visualization of parts and systems. The second part of the course was centered on specific technical aspects for the design of robotic systems. These topics included: batteries, sensors and data acquisition, software control, mechanisms and propulsion. The last part of the class focused on topics involving the actual construction of the robotic systems. The themes for these final lectures revolved around manufacturing techniques, reading and making electrical sketches, electric power conversion and design for robustness. Readings from the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK) were assigned so that the students would see how a systems engineering view improves both the process and product, to motivate the students to have a broader perspective of the topics being taught in the class, and to serve as a bonding agent between the topics, the project, the students and the faculty. In addition to the narrative of the course, this paper also documents the assessment tools used for the class and lessons learned during the process.
Garcia, J. M., & Homkes, R., & Carnes, M. T., & Taylor, K. D. (2015, June), Lessons Learned from Team-Teaching a PBL Robotics Course with Multi-disciplinary Instructors and Students Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24423
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015