New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
The current study reports on the outcomes of a classroom-based long term engineering design intervention intended to increase high school students’ perceptions of the integrated nature of STEM disciplines (iSTEM) and to assess the effect of the intervention on student participation in an extracurricular STEM activity (i.e., a research poster symposium). Cross-disciplinary teams of students (n=373) from high school mathematics, science, and engineering classrooms completed engineering design challenges. The results indicated that, consistent with our predictions, the intervention exhibited a positive impact on students that began the study with the lowest iSTEM scores. Furthermore, the classroom environment mattered. While no individual scores (i.e., posttest iSTEM scores) were predictive of participation in the poster symposium, the collective scores were (i.e., mean classroom iSTEM scores). Four measures were used in this study; Content knowledge quiz. Student content knowledge was assessed with a teacher made nine-item multiple-choice quiz; Self-efficacy, task specific self-efficacy was assessed through a nine item measure; iSTEM perceptions. Participants responded to a nine-item iSTEM scale developed by the authors in a previously published study, to measure student perceptions of the interconnections between mathematics, science, and engineering; and STEM clubs. Participants responded “Yes” (1) or “No” (0) to the question regarding their involvement in extracurricular STEM club.
Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used in this analysis because it distinguishes variability in scores at the student-level (i.e., level-1) from variability in scores at the classroom level (i.e., level-2), which results in correctly estimating standard error. Therefore, HLM was used to conduct multilevel paired sample t-tests. Further, all analyses were conducted with Restricted Maximum Likelihood estimation. The results indicated that, consistent with our predictions, the intervention exhibited a positive impact on students that began the study with the lowest iSTEM scores. Furthermore, the classroom environment mattered. While no individual scores (i.e., posttest iSTEM scores) were predictive of participation in the poster symposium, the collective scores were (i.e., mean classroom iSTEM scores).
de Miranda, M. A., & Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., & Hernandez, P. R. (2016, June), Measuring Student Content Knowledge, iSTEM, Self Efficacy, and Engagement through a Long-Term Engineering Design Intervention Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25694
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015