Portland, Oregon
June 23, 2024
June 23, 2024
June 26, 2024
Engineering Equity: Challenging Paradigms and Cultivating Inclusion in Technical Education
Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
Diversity
10
10.18260/1-2--47773
https://peer.asee.org/47773
116
Nrupaja is a PhD candidate at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is interested in exploring diverse ways of knowing in engineering education and the role of language and metaphors in research and writing.
Yash is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research aims at broadening student participation in STEM through robotics education. His research focuses on enhancing STEM participation through robotics education, employing learning technologies and storytelling to craft inclusive educational experiences that foster student belonging.
Siddhant is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research aims to uncover the role that metaphors and language play in understanding different cultures, emotions, and worldviews of researchers, participants, and students in engineering education.
In this WIP research paper, we will present a literature review and propose a research design to answer the question: How are metaphors used for epistemological boundary-making in engineering education research (EER)? Metaphors help us understand our world. Like light and shadows, every metaphor reveals and conceals different aspects of the phenomenon it describes. For example, discussing broadening participation efforts in engineering education as pipelines, pathways, or ecosystems has different implications for policy and practice. So, metaphors not only influence how we understand a phenomenon but also how we respond to it.
Epistemological boundary-making is concerned with whose knowledge and which knowledge is recognized as valuable. What language do engineering education researchers use when they respond to calls for redrawing epistemological boundaries? What values are implicit in the metaphors we use as we recognize diverse ways of knowing, doing, and being? Scholarship that recognizes the value of marginalized epistemologies often uses metaphorical language focusing on capital such as community cultural wealth, social capital, funds of knowledge or identity, and asset- or resource-based pedagogies. This metaphorical language of capital prioritizes principles of accumulation and ownership in ways that may be dissonant with the marginalized epistemologies we seek to conceptualize.
In this WIP paper, we will explore the metaphors in EER for expanding the epistemological boundaries. The paper will have an in-depth literature review and contribute to scholarship on recognizing and examining metaphors in EER. This work is significant because metaphors are ubiquitous; we do not always clarify the metaphors we use, even when they are sprinkled liberally in our thinking and writing. The literature review will be followed by a proposed study design to understand the metaphors engineering education researchers use for epistemological boundary-making. With this proposed study design we will explore 1) the metaphors that are currently in use, 2) role of these metaphors in epistemological boundary-making and 3) the implications of using these metaphors. With these broad aims, this WIP paper intends to create space for initiating conversations and developing this study. This study will contribute to scholarship on how the language we use can influence the theory and practice in EER and the enactment of equity, culture, and social justice in education.
Bhide, N., & Garje, Y. A., & Joshi, S. S. (2024, June), Metaphors in Engineering Education Research: Prisms to Analyze the Epistemological Spectrum Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47773
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015