Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
23
10.18260/1-2--40860
https://peer.asee.org/40860
373
How interpersonal expressions are separate yet integrated into expectations for entrepreneurial collaboration during in-person classroom scenarios is a major question in engineering education informed by applied cognitive and social sciences. In contrast, students taking classes during the pandemic age of remote work developed start-up actions to engage on a team through a shared vision and attempted ways to pivot and change from an impact that could not be predicted ahead of time. Studies suggest students tackled learning to collaborate through task and process content individually while physically separated from their classmates retrospectively not prospectively. Thus, without explicit practice or preparation new routines were unknowingly established for collaborating from a distance. In the present study we extend our preliminary analysis of 150 engineering students at a public university in California. We identify the characteristics from stories about virtual collaboration during classes with an entrepreneurial collaboration component. Using a novel combination of validated projective story-cue methodology and a survey, participants were prompted during both the pandemic restricted remote classes and in-person to imagine their expectations for collaborating in an entrepreneurial classroom by projecting two ways: as if it was in an in-person setting or as if it was a virtual setting. A goal of the continued study is to extend the analysis to compare and contrast the original findings comparing Winter 2021 student responses (during a virtual educational mode) to Fall 2021 (during an in-person educational mode) using a cohort of engineering students at the same public university. Findings revealed: (1) Operationalizing all the time interfered with the excitement of first meetings and leaving a space for iterative promise, (2) Women were the ones that women and men imagined led the operationalizing work during a virtual educational mode before a return to in-person, (3) Compassion was amplified for students organizing groups with care, “I know what it feels like to be a straggler left behind because it happened to me,” and (4) Shock of the 2020 and 2021 pandemic diminishes over time with prophetic stories of a new, lasting kind of collaboration effect, “It’s difficult to make sure that everyone is actually willing to sit next to someone else in the room, many are still acting awkward and distant with each other.” Results suggest that nostalgia (missing the past or sentimental longing) for remote work during in-person classes causes difficulty integrating individual and interpersonal expectations for collaborative and communicative work in engineering education. We compare Winter 2021(virtual) and Fall 2021 (in-person) evidence with one organizing question: How do in-person vs. virtual environments inhibit or invite collaboration in the classroom during early creative and in start-up actions with the intent of something new?
Karanian, B., & Eskandari, M., & Speer, A., & salloum, M. (2022, August), Nostalgia for Virtual Routines Harness Unexpected Entrepreneurial Actions in Engineering Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40860
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015