Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 1
Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
Diversity
16
10.18260/1-2--43860
https://peer.asee.org/43860
198
Dr. Victoria Sellers is a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum.
Dr. Downey has been a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida since 2021. His current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum as well as how Latinx contingent faculty experience workplace inequities in engineering. He received his Ph.D. in Language, Literacy, and Culture in Education from the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Dr. Downey focuses on critical qualitative inquiry with a discerning eye toward humanizing and culturally sustaining pedagogies.
Dr. Villanueva is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for underrepresented groups.
Hidden curriculum (HC) refers to unwritten and unacknowledged attitudes, values, beliefs, and opinions in an environment [1]–[7]. The research team utilized the [redacted] survey, a validated mixed-methods instrument [7], which they distributed to engineering students and faculty (N = 984) across the United States and Puerto Rico. The research team has previously explored how individuals are aware of, express emotions in response to, and leverage their self-efficacy in response to HC in engineering [1], [6], [8]. The research team originally intended to extend this research to investigate individuals’ self-advocacy strategies, as well as strategies they used to advocate for others when they witness negative HC. However, during descriptive and thematic coding of responses to the self-advocacy open-ended survey item, we noted engineering students’ (n = 27) conceptions that may limit their self-advocacy or advocacy for others (self-/advocacy) in response to negative HC. We explored these responses further using a case study-inspired approach [9], wherein we identified four conceptions about HC self-/advocacy. A few participants (n = 2) did not think that HC in engineering is an issue, and as a result, did not self-/advocate for themselves or others. A few participants (n = 3) insisted on colorblind and gender-blind equality in their self-/advocacy. Many participants (n = 17) acknowledged that HC is present in engineering yet self-advocate or advocate in ways that could perpetuate HC. A few participants (n = 7) conceptualized HC awareness and advocacy, particularly on HC-related issues around sexism and racism, as harmful to some people in engineering. By exploring this group of participants’ further, the research team glimpsed an undercurrent of student opinions around HC self-/advocacy that may inform future professional development and curricular change.
Sellers, V. B., & Downey, R. J., & Villanueva Alarcón, I. (2023, June), Participants’ Conceptions about Self-/Advocacy around Hidden Curriculum in Engineering Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43860
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015