Asee peer logo

Reevaluating the Student Evaluation Process

Download Paper |

Conference

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Vancouver, BC

Publication Date

June 26, 2011

Start Date

June 26, 2011

End Date

June 29, 2011

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

ETD Design V: Classroom Delivery, Course Content, and Assessments

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology

Page Count

7

Page Numbers

22.1229.1 - 22.1229.7

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/18626

Download Count

17

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Scott Dunning University of Maine

visit author page

Dr. Dunning is the Director of the University of Maine School of Engineering Technology (SET). He is responsible for overall supervision of the four academic programs within the school and serves as its academic dean. He is also a tenured Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology. His primary academic responsibilities have been for teaching courses within the electrical engineering technology program.

Dr. Dunning’s primary research interests are in the areas of power systems optimization and the application of energy efficient technologies to industry. Previously, he was the Director and Founder of the University of Maine Industrial Assessment Center where he supervised the completion of over 200 industrial assessments for New England manufacturers. In 2002, the center evolved into the University of Maine Advanced Manufacturing Center. As Executive Director of the AMC, he coordinated engineering outreach projects to support economic development in the state as well as supporting research centers on the University of Maine campus.

Dr. Dunning is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Maine and previous Chair of the Maine Section of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. He is a Certified Energy Manager and provides C.E.M. training for the Association of Energy Engineers both nationally and internationally. He is also previous National Chair for the Engineering Technology Division of the American Society for Engineering Education. He currently serves as a commissioner for the Technology Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc.

visit author page

biography

Rosemary A. LaMountain University of Maine

visit author page

Administrative Associate in the School of Engineering Technology department.

visit author page

biography

Linda Liscomb University of Maine

visit author page

Administrative Asst. II
School of Engineering Technology

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Abstract "Reevaluating the Student Evaluation Process" Scott Dunning, Rosemary Lamountain, Linda Liscomb University of MaineAt the end of each semester, students dutifully fill out student evaluation forms toevaluate the quality of the course and the course delivery and administration asperformed by the instructor. Many institutions use forms that have remainedrelatively unchanged for years. Some use a wide battery of questions to cover allpossible aspects of the course. Others use less questions but encourage or requiresupporting comments from students to justify scores. A review of availablereference data on the topic will be detailed.This paper examines the student evaluation process and discusses the strengths andweaknesses of several approaches. Data collected during the 2009-2010 academicyear comparing evaluation data from two different evaluation forms that were usedin multiple classes will be presented. Statistical analysis will be presented alongwith qualitative data comparison. Conclusions will be drawn based upon theresults.

Dunning, S., & LaMountain, R. A., & Liscomb, L. (2011, June), Reevaluating the Student Evaluation Process Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/18626

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2011 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015