## Solving For The Internal Rate Of Return Directly

Conference

2001 Annual Conference

Location

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Publication Date

June 24, 2001

Start Date

June 24, 2001

End Date

June 27, 2001

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

6.883.1 - 6.883.11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--9785

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/9785

3382

#### Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

ASession 1639

Solving for the Internal Rate of Return Directly

Wayne D. Cottrell, University of Utah

Abstract

The trial-and-error and graphical methods for computing the internal rate of return (IRR) are traditionally taught in engineering economics and financial management courses. While developing an understanding for direct computation of the IRR may enhance the learning process, little attention is devoted to direct solution. This paper explores the direct solution of the IRR using the roots of polynomials. Direct computation is feasible in three cases: two cash flows during an N-year study period, three cash flows during a two-year period, and four cash flows during a three-year period with equal revenues in years 1-3. As the degree of the polynomial increases, directly computing the IRR becomes laborious. Sharing these points with engineering economics and management students may improve the understanding of both the IRR’s definition and its computational methods.

Introduction

The rate of return is a percentage figure that indicates the relative yield of different uses of capital. Rate of return methods are used to compare investment alternatives. Since the rate of return is an interest rate, the interpretation is straightforward. The internal rate of return (IRR) is one of several that are either commonly used or have been proposed in the literature; the others include the minimum attractive rate of return (MARR) and the external rate of return (ERR),15 the accounting rate of return (ARR),14 the overall rate of return,3,4 the modified internal rate of return (MIRR),9 the effective rate of return,2 and the adjusted modified internal rate of return (ADJMIRR).13 Some of the less frequently used rates of return have similar bases.8 The MARR is often used as a benchmark to which another rate of return is compared.15 One definition of the IRR is “the rate that yields a present worth of zero by assuming that all cash flows are reinvested at the IRR11.” Another definition is “the interest rate earned on the unrecovered project balance of investment such that, when the project terminates, the unrecovered project balance will be zero10.” The two definitions are equivalent in that the IRR equates the present worth of project’s cash expenses with its cash receipts. For a balance between expenses and income to occur, all income is presumed to be reinvested at an interest rate equivalent to the IRR. That is, all returns on funds remain internally invested in the project, such that there is no unrecovered balance at the project’s termination. The IRR is the interest rate at which:

EW (receipts) = EW (expenses), (1)

Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education

Cottrell, W. (2001, June), Solving For The Internal Rate Of Return Directly Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 10.18260/1-2--9785

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015