Asee peer logo

Student Experience and Learning with a Formative Sustainable Design Rubric

Download Paper |

Conference

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Tampa, Florida

Publication Date

June 15, 2019

Start Date

June 15, 2019

End Date

June 19, 2019

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Tagged Division

Design in Engineering Education

Page Count

18

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/33293

Download Count

3

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Elise Barrella Wake Forest University Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-2035

visit author page

Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor and Founding Faculty Member of the Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University. She is passionate about curriculum development, scholarship and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engineering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she conducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework.

visit author page

biography

Charles McDonald Cowan II Wake Forest University

visit author page

Mack Cowan is a recent graduate of James Madison University's Psychological Sciences M.A. program. His primary research interests are sleep and pharmacology using animal models, the psychology of learning, statistical analyses in behavioral research, and more recently, engineering education.

visit author page

author page

Justyn Daniel Girdner James Madison University

biography

Mary Katherine Watson The Citadel Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-1718-5825

visit author page

Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment.

visit author page

biography

Robin Anderson James Madison University

visit author page

Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Rubrics are valuable teaching and learning tools that allow for faculty and students to evaluate project work and use the results as formative or summative assessments of learning and application. As part of a research project focused on improving student learning and application of sustainable design concepts, the research team is developing a validated rubric for faculty and students to evaluate student design projects. In this study, student users applied the rubric, which has been validated for content, to preliminary capstone projects as formative assessment. Junior engineering students in a second-semester capstone course at a mid-sized comprehensive university applied the Sustainable Design Rubric to their in-progress capstone projects as a homework assignment. The assignment was given to 70 students across 15 teams for completion credit and 51 students consented to having their work included in this research study. The students first evaluated their project with respect to a subset of criteria (nine pre-assigned criteria per student) and then as a team discussed consensus scores for their project across all fourteen criteria. Students documented both their scores and their justifications for the individual and consensus scores. Finally, the students answered eleven reflection questions, both open-ended and Likert scale, about the experience of using the rubric and its value to improving (or not) their projects. Ultimately, 47 students completed the rubric scoring and all of the reflection questions. The research team reviewed and rated the quality of students’ individual justifications for each criterion and compared those results to the students’ self-reported rating of ease and difficulty of applying criteria and value of the consensus process. From the scoring results and the reflection questions, students had the most difficulty rating and justifying the economic criteria, usually because they had not yet considered economic costs and benefits of their project. In some cases, students had difficulty understanding a criterion and how it applied to their project. The social criteria were deemed easiest to apply because students saw direct connection to project work they had already completed. That said, high ratings were often not strongly justified, indicating room for continued improvement in engaging stakeholders and considering their needs. Environmental criteria earned mixed results, with most students finding the criteria relevant to their project but with little direct evidence at the mid-point in their projects. Most students identified areas for additional learning or project improvement as a result of completing the individual scoring and consensus process. The paper will provide a deeper review of the quantitative and qualitative results and a holistic discussion of the value added from formative application of the rubric. Future work will address other audiences and assessment purposes.

Barrella, E., & Cowan, C. M., & Girdner, J. D., & Watson, M. K., & Anderson, R. (2019, June), Student Experience and Learning with a Formative Sustainable Design Rubric Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/33293

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015