Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
10
10.18260/1-2--40506
https://peer.asee.org/40506
305
Rachel Mosier is an Associate Professor at Oklahoma State University and a licensed as a professional engineer in Construction Engineering with 7 years experience as a structural engineer. Mosier worked 6 years in municipal government public works. Mosier researches infrastructure specifically focused on sustainable infrastructure and its cost. Other research interests include engineering education topics.
She has been a member of ASEE since 2015 and is currently serving as Program Chair of the Architectural Engineering Division and is the Construction Division Chair.
Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He completed a Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management, from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with 20 years of the academic experience at five different universities. Students and departments have always praised him for his outstanding teaching and research excellence. He has been involved in numerous professional societies to supplement his teaching and research, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.
With the structural shift in education due to the pandemic, worldwide educators adapted by a variety of methods, including a change to the course delivery method. Many universities closed and/or moved to wholly online delivery. With the online video formats, either synchronous or asynchronous, faculty were able to create a library of videos which could be later used as a tool. This new collection of videos could be used for asynchronous delivery or online courses, or as supplemental instructional videos. A survey was conducted to determine student perceptions of supplemental instructional videos.
Supplemental instructional videos were available pre-pandemic by individual instructors and publishers. Instructors may have offered videos through a Learning Management System (LMS) or a streaming platform. These types of videos vary from general topic overviews to course specific content. Certain types of courses and content have long been identified as appropriate for online delivery, like software-based courses. However, instructors have been slow to adopt online delivery for hands-on laboratory exercises or architectural studios.
Because of this post-pandemic paradigm shift, there is an opportunity to identify the associated shift in student perceptions. A survey instrument was developed to assess student perceptions about supplemental instructional videos. All of the students surveyed are enrolled in courses which provide supplemental instructional videos through their LMS. The survey was not limited to perceptions about current courses. Students across engineering, engineering technology, and architecture disciplines were asked about their perceptions of supplemental instructional videos made available through LMS. The LMS collects analytical data about usage, and depending on the LMS, precisely how much and which portions of a video were viewed by students. The survey included demographic questions in addition to questions about experience with online learning and supplemental instructional videos.
Students surveyed included all levels of undergraduate students and graduate students from two universities in different states. Students are generally split in their preference for online or face-to-face delivery methods. About two-thirds of the respondents had been exposed to supplemental instructional videos. Similar to completely online courses, respondents identified reasons that supplemental instructional videos were a good resource, which included the lack of time constraints and the ability to watch and re-watch the videos.
Mosier, R., & Ramming, C., & Adhikari, S., & Agnew, R. (2022, August), Student Post-Pandemic Perceptions of Supplemental Instructional Videos Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40506
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015