Asee peer logo

Student Responses to a Gender-Neutral Engineering Ethics Case Study

Download Paper |

Conference

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Minneapolis, MN

Publication Date

August 23, 2022

Start Date

June 26, 2022

End Date

June 29, 2022

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Page Count

14

DOI

10.18260/1-2--40965

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/40965

Download Count

537

Paper Authors

biography

Charles Riley Oregon Institute of Technology

visit author page

Professor and Graduate Program Director
Civil Engineering Department
Oregon Institute of Technology
I conduct research in diverse areas of engineering education from professional skills, to writing, to gender and ethics. I also maintain a structures laboratory to conduct full-scale structural component testing and field investigations of highway bridges.

visit author page

biography

Franny Howes Oregon Institute of Technology

visit author page

Franny Howes (e/em/eirs) is an associate professor in the Communication Department at the Oregon Institute of Technology, where e teaches professional writing and digital media.

visit author page

biography

Yasha Rohwer Oregon Institute of Technology

visit author page

Yasha Rohwer is an associate professor of philosophy at Oregon Tech. He specializes in philosophy of science and applied ethics. He teaches ethics classes at Oregon Tech to many future engineers.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Gender-neutral pronouns, particularly singular they, are becoming increasingly visible. Engineering texts do not often require consideration of gender when they treat technical content, but social considerations in engineering education regularly rely on case studies. Ethics case studies are a common approach to teaching ethical reasoning to engineering students and feature individuals who must make a choice in a difficult ethical reasoning scenario. The evolution of such case studies to feature female characters more equitably has occurred with gender equity efforts in engineering education. Further evolution to support the full gender spectrum will require similar advancements and changes to education practice.

This paper describes an effort to modify an existing engineering ethics case study to use singular they pronouns to refer to the named main character and unnamed supervisor. The more general client, a county public works department, was also a gender-neutral character. An analysis of the resulting responses by students is presented including an examination of gender attribution to both the protagonist engineer, their supervisor, and their client. The engineer was gendered in all but two student responses, with most applying he/him pronouns and only three out of 23 students applying she/her pronouns. Only five students self-reported after the fact that they recognized the gender-neutral presentation of the case study statement. This paper generates many questions, but the results demonstrate a distinct bias that will require effort on the part of engineering educators and the profession to overcome. Suggestions to improve engineering ethics instruction include preparing ethics case studies with greater gender representation in characters and preparing ethics assessments as role playing exercises that put students in the shoes of the protagonist rather than asking them to critique another’s actions.

Riley, C., & Howes, F., & Rohwer, Y. (2022, August), Student Responses to a Gender-Neutral Engineering Ethics Case Study Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40965

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015