Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 23, 2004
2153-5965
16
9.1131.1 - 9.1131.16
10.18260/1-2--12786
https://peer.asee.org/12786
428
Session 3266
Student Understanding of Program Outcomes through Formative and Summative Course-Level Assessment
Raghu Echempati, Arnaldo Mazzei and Karim Nasr Mechanical Engineering Department Kettering University Flint, MI 48504
Abstract
In this paper, an approach is suggested to begin a process in which each student, while solving a homework problem, or a test or a project is asked to provide additional information concerning what concept(s) is (are) targeted in each homework problem and to what extent, if any, the Program Outcomes (PO’s) were encountered. The courses used here as examples for this approach are: Mechanics III (particle and rigid body kinematics and dynamics) and Design of Mechanical Components I. Students seem in tune with the targeted concepts via course experiences but rather non-consistent with regards to the interpretation of Program Outcomes. For many students, this is the first time that they are asked to examine the outcomes critically, but they all seem to understand and realize the merit of the process (particularly due to the quick feedback of the results that they receive). Some students were further challenged to “redesign” some of the homework problems in such a way that the previously addressed “weaker” Program Outcomes could be better addressed in those redesigned problems. The results of the “redesign” exercise are interesting in that students found it both difficult and challenging to create a new set of homework problems. This leads to the need for the instructor to provide effective ways of posing homework problems, which may be different from conventional exercise problems presented in the currently available textbooks. Presented here is a course-level formative and summative assessment of students’ understanding of the Program Outcomes, including comparison with the instructor’s target expectation for the achievement of such outcomes. The paper concludes with ways to gather better data illustrating students’ interpretation of Program Outcomes and perhaps redesign course content and instructional method to better meet desired outcomes.
Introduction
Recently, the accreditation process of engineering programs has taken a new form, becoming an outcome-based process wherein individual courses and experiences must contribute to the big picture of engineering education and students’ achievement of specific abilities and skills. This Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Nasr, K., & Echempati, R., & Mazzei, A. (2004, June), Student Understanding Of Program Outcomes Through Formative And Summative Course Level Assessment Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--12786
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015