June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
The following evidence based practice study investigates the impact of a First-Year Engineering discipline exploration course as it relates to retention, frequency of major change, and progress towards graduation. First-Year Engineering courses play a pivotal role in helping students not only determine which engineering discipline to choose but whether or not engineering is a major they want to continue to pursue. If students are able to make more informed decisions about the pathways in which to endeavor then there will likely be a quicker time to graduation and a less time and resources spent. However, not all First-Year Engineering courses and/or programs contain elements of major selection for students. This paper fills this gaps and describes how implementing a one-credit engineering orientation course can help students make timelier decisions regarding their intended major.
The study was conducted at a medium sized, Midwestern, public institution and compares two cohorts of students that experienced two different approaches to exploring engineering major selection, one starting in Fall of 2013 compared to the group stating in the Fall 2014. The original course, Fall 2013, involved a large lecture class with 200+ students, one instructor, and guest instructors from each department that lectured for 2 – 50 minute class periods on their discipline of engineering. The course was revised for Fall 2014 and involved 10 sections of 20-25 students that completed a hands on activity each week, 1 – 50 minute class period, related to each engineering discipline. Students rotated each week to a new engineering discipline session and after all departments had presented, students were able to select engineering disciplinary sessions of their interest for the remainder of the semester. For both cohorts, students were tracked longitudinally through their first-year, second-year, to the start of their third year to determine: (1) if they were retained in the STEM College, (2) the number of major changes during that time period, and (3) the number of credits completed towards graduation. Results of these factors are analyzed statistically and discussed within the context of engineering major selection, retention, and time to graduation.
Meyers, K., & Brozina, C. (2017, June), Supporting an Informed Selection of an Engineering Major Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28886
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015