Asee peer logo

Teacher Discourse Moves that Support Dialogic Interactions in Engineering in Linguistically Diverse Classrooms

Download Paper |


2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

Pre-College: Teacher Impact on Student Mastery

Tagged Division

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

Tagged Topic


Page Count


Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Amy Wilson-Lopez Utah State University, Teacher Education and Leadership

visit author page

Amy Wilson-Lopez is an associate professor at Utah State University who studies culturally responsive engineering and literacy-infused engineering with linguistically diverse students.

visit author page


Jared W. Garlick Utah State University

visit author page

Jared Garlick is a Graduate Student in the Secondary Education Master's of Education (MEd) program through the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services. Research interests include argumentation in science and engineering and the benefit they play in developing literacy in specific content areas.

visit author page

Download Paper |


Oral discussion in the classroom is important in learning outcomes for students. Traditional oral discourse has included the initiate, respond, evaluate (I-R-E) pattern of oral discourse, but this pattern is associated with negative student outcomes. Dialogic exchanges, however, lead to positive student outcomes. These exchanges have been proven especially beneficial for English Learners. This study focuses on two middle school teachers’ classes in the Western United States where the population percentage of English Learners was higher than average. A minimum of two engineering units taught by these two teachers were audio-recorded and then transcribed. Dialogic discourse was then identified in the transcripts as occurrences where students spoke without the interjection of the teacher. After determining where dialogic discourse occurred, we identified the preceding oral discourse moves employed by the teacher. When reviewing these discourse moves, we discovered two recurring oral discourse moves used by the teachers that facilitated dialogic discourse in the classroom. First, when teachers asked students to share relevant life experiences, they were more likely to engage in dialogic spells. Second, when teachers asked open-ended questions, students were more likely to engage in dialogic spells. These findings were consistent when teachers engaged with both English learners and students who were not identified as English learners. However, these two oral discourse moves were still used infrequently within the classrooms. We then conclude that dialogic discourse is possible in engineering education, and suggest these findings can improve pre-service and in-service teacher education.

Wilson-Lopez, A., & Garlick, J. W. (2017, June), Teacher Discourse Moves that Support Dialogic Interactions in Engineering in Linguistically Diverse Classrooms Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015