Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
18
10.18260/1-2--41157
https://peer.asee.org/41157
453
Since February 2017, China's central and provincial governments have issued a large number of the "Emerging Engineering" policy. This article refers to Rothwell and Zegveld's (1984) policy tool classification ideas, adopts the content analysis method, analyzes 38 the "Emerging Engineering" policy documents issued by the Chinese central government based on the two-dimensional analysis framework of "policy tools-policy goals". The study found that the structure of China’s "Emerging Engineering" policy is unbalanced, environment policy tools are overused, supply policy tools are underused, and demand policy tools are missing. Environment policy tools are currently the main driving force behind the construction and development of the "Emerging Engineering" policy. There is an overflow risk and crowding-out effect in the use of tool structures; talent training is the focus of the emerging engineering policy, but the "policy tools-policy goals" lacks matching. The article puts forward suggestions on the optimization and improvement of China's "Emerging Engineering" policy.
deng, Y., & Li, T., & Ye, M. (2022, August), Textual and Quantitative Research on Chinese "Emerging engineering" Policies from the perspective of Policy Tools Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41157
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015