Tampa, Florida
June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
June 19, 2019
Educational Research and Methods
11
10.18260/1-2--33388
https://peer.asee.org/33388
456
MAJ Miller is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He holds an advanced degree in Aerospace Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology.
MAJ Rigney is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He holds an advanced degree in Aeronautical & Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University.
MAJ Arnold is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He holds an advanced degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University.
Major David Flaherty is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He earned a M.S. in civil engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 2017. He is currently the course director for the Fundamentals of Engineering Mechanics and Design Course, which is the largest course within the Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department. He can be contacted at david.flaherty@usma.edu.
Class frequency and duration are fundamental parameters within engineering education across nearly all pedagogical methods. Optimizing these factors enables programs to achieve a higher level of learning in the classroom while providing for more efficient time management. The objective of this paper is to document the perceived effect on students and instructors when transitioning from a traditional 40 lesson course with 55 minutes duration, to one comprised of 30 lessons at 75 minutes in length. This analysis limits research to a mechanical engineering curriculum within an undergraduate engineering program. Major assessment performance under the new structure was compared with historical results to provide objective qualitative comparison. Anonymous student feedback was also collected in the midpoint and end of each course. Survey questions centered on perceived information absorption and synthesis, impact on problem solving opportunities, and the effect of variation in classroom contact time. Changes in course syllabi to accommodate the 75 minute structure generally resulted in no net gain or loss of new material to the original curriculum, though outliers did occur and are discussed in more detail. Class size averaged 18 students over four different courses, ranging from Helicopter Aeronautics to Vehicle Dynamics. The change in course structure demonstrates potential opportunity for both greater depth and application of learning in the classroom as well as increased schedule flexibility. Conversely, the heightened implications of students missing class and the administrative feasibility of such a shift can be problematic. Instructor assessment of student learning and student feedback through end-of-course evaluations will be presented in this paper, as well as recommendations for future instructors wishing to apply similar changes.
Miller, M. L., & Rigney, J. M., & Arnold, D., & Flaherty, D. M. (2019, June), The Effects of Transitioning an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Course from Shorter and More Frequent Class Periods to Longer and Fewer In-Class Sessions Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33388
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015