June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.1372.1 - 10.1372.10
Understanding Student and Faculty Attitudes With Respect to Service Learning: Lessons from the Humanitarian Engineering Program
E. Heidi Bauer, Barbara Moskal, Joan Gosink, Juan Lucena, David Muñoz Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Abstract Now entering its second year, the Humanitarian Engineering Program, which is sponsored by the Hewlett Foundation, at the Colorado School of Mines is creating curriculum that will support engineering students in developing an understanding of their responsibility for solving humanitarian problems that exist throughout the world. As part of this effort, baseline data has been collected on both the faculty and student attitudes towards service activities using the “Community Service Attitudes Scale” which was developed and validated by Shiarella, McCarthy, and Tucker1. During the fall of 2004, 78 students and 34 faculty responded to this assessment instrument. Student data were collected in the first semester of the Multidisciplinary Engineering Laboratory course sequence, a required course taken at the start of students’ sophomore year before they have the opportunity to participate in the newly revised service learning courses. Faculty completed the attitudes survey during the first faculty meeting of the academic year. This paper describes and compares student and faculty attitudes with respect to service activities prior to the proposed intervention. Attention is given to attitudinal differences between male and female students and among students in different age groups.
Since the Marshall Plan of 1947 and President Truman’s famous ‘Point Four’ of his second inaugural address, United States foreign policy has stressed the importance of applying technical knowledge to aid ‘under-developed’ countries2. This has resulted in more than five decades of U.S. funding for humanitarian projects; however, because most U.S. engineers choose to work in the corporate sector, few have made substantial contributions to the solution of the humanitarian problems that face other nations. The few engineers who do work in U.S. aid and development organizations must commit to the objectives of U.S. foreign policy, which emphasizes macro economic growth instead of the fulfillment of basic human needs.
At the same time, prominent engineers and educators have been concerned by engineering graduates’ reluctance to enter political life, community service, and international work in the non-profit sector3. Furthermore, the public’s attitude toward engineering is not encouraging4. Leaders in engineering education and the profession have argued that many believe that engineering is irrelevant to humanity’s present and future needs, and this belief has contributed to the steady decline of engineering enrollment over the last decade, as well as the persistent under-representation of women and minorities in engineering. Engineering students are often
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
Lucena, J., & Bauer, E., & Munoz, D., & Gosink, J., & Moskal, B. (2005, June), Understanding Student And Faculty Attitudes With Respect To Service Learning: Lessons From The Humanitarian Engineering Program Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--15133
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015