San Antonio, Texas
June 10, 2012
June 10, 2012
June 13, 2012
25.1444.1 - 25.1444.14
Using Systemic Functional Linguistics to Analyze Engineering Speak in an Introductory Materials Science & Engineering CourseStudents can use technical language consistent with science and engineering norms yet may notknow the meaning of these words. This phenomenon has been examined in science classroomsby many researchers. However, little work has been done in the context of engineering whichrequires students to not only be able use engineering terms and understand natural scienceconcepts, but to also be able to clearly articulate and understand these concepts with respect toengineering applications. In order to understand and interpret student academic language, a lensto analyze and quantify it is required. This paper will answer the research question, “How canstudent proficiency of engineering academic language be assessed?” To answer this question, afunctional view of linguistics will be used as a theoretical framework for interpreting engineeringacademic language. While traditional views of language focus primarily on grammar, whichworks with the structure of sentences, a functional view of linguistics examines the relationshipsbetween these structural components of language and their contexts and meanings. Thistheoretical lens is particularly relevant to engineering language, as understanding its use in thecontext of engineering design is of utmost importance. Systemic functional linguistics (SFL)will be used as a theoretical framework for analyzing engineering speak in an introductorymaterials science and engineering course. A written engineering design task, asked students touse as much engineering knowledge and vocabulary as possible to discuss the design of abicycle. This task was administered four times over the course of the semester. An SFLframework was used to analyze students' engineering speak as it evolved throughout the course.Preliminary results suggest that student language use can be monitored successfully over thecourse of a semester, allowing instructors to make instructional decisions to enhance andmaximize student learning. Challenges, affordances, and results of interpreting engineeringspeak through an SFL lens will be described and discussed in the full paper.
Kelly, J. E., & Krause, S. J., & Baker, D. R. (2012, June), Using Systemic Functional Linguistics to Analyze Engineering Speak in an Introductory Materials Science and Engineering Course Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--22201
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015