Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
CPDD Technical Session 1 - Design of Professional Development Curricula
10
10.18260/1-2--40647
https://peer.asee.org/40647
316
Audeen Fentiman is the Crowley Family Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue University and principal investigator for an NSF-sponsored project to develop, deploy and evaluate online instructional modules in model-based systems engineering. She spent more than a decade in industry and 25 years as a Nuclear Engineering faculty member before transferring to Engineering Education.
Dr. Kerrie Douglas, Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue, studies how to improve the quality of classroom assessments and evaluation of online learning in a variety of engineering education contexts. She holds a PhD in Educational Psychology and a M.A. in Educational Studies, with focus on school counseling. She is a co-PI on the SCALE project, leading the evaluation and assessment efforts. She recently received an NSF award to study engineering instructor decisions and student support during COVID-19 and impact the pandemic is having on engineering students. She also recently won the prestigious CAREER award from the U.S. National Science Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.
C. Robert Kenley is a Professor of Engineering Practice in Purdue’s School of Industrial Engineering, where has been developing courses and curricula to support the educational objectives of the Purdue Systems Collaboratory. He has over 30 years’ experience in industry, academia, and government as a practitioner, consultant, and researcher in systems engineering. He has published papers on systems requirements, technology readiness assessment and forecasting, Bayes nets, applied meteorology, the impacts of nuclear power plants on employment, and model-based systems engineering, and agent-based modeling for systems of systems. He is an expert system engineering professional (ESEP), and a Fellow of INCOSE.
Dr. Wanju Huang is a Clinical Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology at Purdue University. Prior to joining the LDT program, she was an instructional design manager at Teaching and Learning Technologies, Purdue Online, where she led a team of instructional designers and video producers for course design and development. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction (with a concentration in Technology) from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. For six years prior to joining Purdue in Fall 2016, she was a lecturer and an instructional designer at Eastern Kentucky University. Her research interests include: technology for building online communities, online identities and communication, the educational use of augmented reality, and the effectiveness of faculty development programs
A multidisciplinary team of eighteen faculty, staff, and students at a large Midwestern University is preparing online instructional materials on model-based systems engineering (MBSE) for current and potential employees of organizations that are either transitioning to model-based systems engineering or planning to do so in the near future. Our goal is to design, develop, deploy, and evaluate a suite of instructional modules, making them as effective and flexible as possible for employees with a wide variety of education, experience, and job responsibilities. It is essential for us to prepare materials that are well-aligned with the needs of organizations whose employees will be working in the digital environment using model-based systems engineering. This paper outlines the actions we are finding to be effective in aligning our modules with organizations’ needs. The effort to align our materials with industry needs began before the project was officially launched. Some of our team members with MBSE expertise had industry connections and were able to identify people in several organizations who were either experts in, or advocates for adoption of, MBSE. Our team developed a series of questions for those industry contacts and held hour-long conversations with representatives of eleven organizations. We asked a series of questions ranging from which categories of employees would require training in MBSE and what topics should be covered to how employees are accustomed to receiving training and what technology they would have available to them for MBSE training. The questions were often open-ended, allowing us to gather information beyond what we knew to ask about. Some of the key contacts at organizations agreed to serve on an advisory board which meets semi-annually. At those meetings, we ask board members to give us more detailed, and current, information on MBSE topics to be covered, ways employees prefer to interact with instructional materials, and how we can best integrate our materials into an organization’s ongoing training program. Those responses are influencing the development and deployment of our instructional modules. As each module is completed, it is sent to a subgroup of the advisory board (or their designees) for a thorough review. Reviewers, who participate in the process voluntarily, are asked questions about content quality, how well the modules motivate learners, instructional design, and so on. Typically, three to five reviewers provide feedback, with detailed comments as well as ratings on a Likert-like scale. Finally, a few employees with varied amounts of MBSE experience take the completed module and provide feedback on their level of satisfaction with the module and their thoughts on its value and effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to describe the actions we have taken to align our instructional modules with employers’ needs and to discuss the lessons we have learned so far.
Fentiman, A., & Sutherland, J., & Delaurentis, D., & Douglas, K., & Dorribo Camba, J., & Kenley, C. R., & Raz, A., & Koehler, A., & Huang, W., & Hurt, A., & Richardson, J. (2022, August), Work in Progress: Aligning a Professional Development Program with Industry Needs Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40647
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015