Louisville, Kentucky
June 20, 2010
June 20, 2010
June 23, 2010
2153-5965
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
15
15.1164.1 - 15.1164.15
10.18260/1-2--15724
https://peer.asee.org/15724
442
Teacher Professional Development in Grades 3-5: Fostering Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering
Abstract
Innovative, research-based professional development is needed to help teachers implement science and engineering education in elementary schools. This is a challenging task, particularly for teachers who many have little familiarity with either science inquiry or the engineering design process (EDP), and who may not have developed the instructional strategies needed to facilitate student inquiry and engagement in EDP. In the Partnership to Improve Student Achievement (PISA) study, 43 grade 3-5 teachers in New Jersey participated in a two-week summer workshop, three workshops during the school year, and received monthly classroom support visits, which comprised one year of instructional activities in a three-year professional development program. The study also included 737 students taught by teachers in the treatment group, 35 teachers in the comparison group, and 684 students taught by teachers in the comparison group. We analyzed pre- and post- tests of teachers and students in both groups and teacher activity implementation surveys. Results from the pre- and post- tests showed that the treatment teachers significantly increased their content knowledge in science and engineering compared to the comparison group. Similarly, post-test scores of students in the treatment group were significantly higher than the post-test scores of students in the comparison group. Teachers noted that scientific inquiry and the engineering design process promoted 21st century skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, collaboration, and communication among students. Finally, further data analysis revealed that the number of PISA lessons that teachers implemented in their classrooms was a significant predictor of students’ test scores. In this paper, we report on the professional development model that we used and the results of our study.
Introduction
Exemplary professional development (PD) for teachers can have a positive impact on students’ learning and the classroom environment. Specifically, Blank & de las Alas1 found successful PD experiences for math teachers contributed to an increase in teachers’ subject knowledge, pedagogy, and students’ content knowledge. However, teacher PD that focuses on integrating science and engineering in elementary schools is still in its infancy. The engineering component of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education has been overlooked in K-12 teacher education for many years2. To address these challenges, an intensive teacher professional development program was launched in 2007 to infuse high quality, research-based engineering lessons into elementary science education by working with the same group of teachers over a three-year period. Results from the first year of the program showed that teachers and students in the treatment group had statistically significant learning gains in science and engineering concepts and skills as well as in the targeted science content alone3. Further, teachers’ knowledge of and use of inquiry-based science instruction also increased4. In the second year of this program, the PISA built on professional development efforts by providing 43 grade 3-5 teachers in N.J. with inquiry-based coursework focusing on strengthening teachers’ understanding of science concepts (in this case, earth science); hands-on experience using
Macalalag, A., & Lowes, S., & Guo, K., & Tirthali, D., & McKay, M., & McGrath, E. (2010, June), Teacher Professional Development In Grades 3 5: Fostering Teachers' And Students’ Content Knowledge In Science And Engineering Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--15724
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015