Board 21: Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and Engineering Workplace Settings: How Situated are Engineering Concepts in These Contexts?

Shane A. Brown; Matthew Stephen Barner

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Tampa, Florida
Publication Date: June 15, 2019
Start Date: June 15, 2019
End Date: June 19, 2019
Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Topic: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Page Count: 11
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32297
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/32297
Download Count: 358

Paper Authors

biography

Shane A. Brown P.E. Oregon State University orcid.org/0000-0003-3669-8407

visit author page

Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.

visit author page

biography

Matthew Stephen Barner Oregon State University orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-6708

visit author page

PhD student at Oregon State University working under Dr. Shane Brown.

Research interests include: engineering education, faculty development, conceptual change theory, and earthquake engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and Engineering Workplace Settings: How situated are engineering concepts in these contexts?

Division of Engineering Education and Centers

Background: The notion of a concept implies an abstract chunk of information that is ubiquitous across contexts. However, situated cognition theories suggest that conceptual understanding is nuanced and shaped by the contexts wherein conceptual knowledge is learned and applied. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this research is to better understand the similarities and differences between contexts in engineering education and practice. Through exploration of these contexts, we can better understand how contexts manifest similar and different ways of conceptual representations amongst engineering students and professionals. By representations we mean the ways in which conceptual knowledge is demonstrated within social and material contexts. Design/Methods: This research implemented ethnographic methods within education and practice settings to better understand the influence of context on conceptual representations. To narrow our scope on context, the ethnographic research focused on structural engineering concepts represented by structural engineering students, instructors, and professionals within upper-level structural engineering courses and on real-world structural engineering projects. Results: Early results indicate that students, instructors, and professionals generally agree on common definitions of structural engineering concepts. However, the ways in which these three groups represent those concepts varies based on their contexts. These contexts and subsequent representations have their purposes suited for the academic or workplace settings where they occur, but there exists avenues to simulate workplace contexts in academic settings to help bridge the education-practice gap. Conclusion: While most engineering students, instructors, and professionals would agree that the purpose of engineering education is to prepare future engineers for the workplace; contexts of the workplace can vary from company to company and position to position. Through more focused in-depth explorations of these contexts within specific engineering disciplines, we can better understand which engineering concepts are ubiquitous and which are not.

Citation
Format

Brown, S. A., & Barner, M. S. (2019, June), Board 21: Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and Engineering Workplace Settings: How Situated are Engineering Concepts in These Contexts? Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32297

TY - CPAPER
AB - Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and Engineering Workplace Settings: How situated are engineering concepts in these contexts?

Division of Engineering Education and Centers

Background: The notion of a concept implies an abstract chunk of information that is ubiquitous across contexts. However, situated cognition theories suggest that conceptual understanding is nuanced and shaped by the contexts wherein conceptual knowledge is learned and applied.
Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this research is to better understand the similarities and differences between contexts in engineering education and practice. Through exploration of these contexts, we can better understand how contexts manifest similar and different ways of conceptual representations amongst engineering students and professionals. By representations we mean the ways in which conceptual knowledge is demonstrated within social and material contexts.
Design/Methods: This research implemented ethnographic methods within education and practice settings to better understand the influence of context on conceptual representations. To narrow our scope on context, the ethnographic research focused on structural engineering concepts represented by structural engineering students, instructors, and professionals within upper-level structural engineering courses and on real-world structural engineering projects.
Results: Early results indicate that students, instructors, and professionals generally agree on common definitions of structural engineering concepts. However, the ways in which these three groups represent those concepts varies based on their contexts. These contexts and subsequent representations have their purposes suited for the academic or workplace settings where they occur, but there exists avenues to simulate workplace contexts in academic settings to help bridge the education-practice gap.
Conclusion: While most engineering students, instructors, and professionals would agree that the purpose of engineering education is to prepare future engineers for the workplace; contexts of the workplace can vary from company to company and position to position. Through more focused in-depth explorations of these contexts within specific engineering disciplines, we can better understand which engineering concepts are ubiquitous and which are not.

AU - Shane A. Brown P.E.
AU - Matthew Stephen Barner
CY - Tampa, Florida
DA - 2019/06/15
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Board 21: Representation of Engineering Concepts in Academic and Engineering Workplace Settings: How Situated are Engineering Concepts in These Contexts?
UR - https://peer.asee.org/32297
DO - 10.18260/1-2--32297
ER -