Davishahl, E., & Haskell, T. R., & Davishahl, J., & Singleton, L., & Goodridge, W. H. (2019, June), Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32675

\bibitem{asee_peer_32675}
  Davishahl, E., \& Haskell, T. R., \& Davishahl, J., \& Singleton, L., \& Goodridge, W. H. (2019, June), \emph{Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations}
  Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida.
  10.18260/1-2--32675

Eric Davishahl, Todd R. Haskell, Jill Davishahl, Lee Singleton, and Wade H. Goodridge.  "Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations".  2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2019.  https://peer.asee.org/32675 Internet.  26 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_32675}
  Eric Davishahl, Todd R. Haskell, Jill Davishahl, Lee Singleton, and Wade H. Goodridge.
  "Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations".
  \emph{2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Tampa, Florida, 2019, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2019.
  https://peer.asee.org/32675 Internet.  26 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_32675
author = "Eric Davishahl, Todd R. Haskell, Jill Davishahl, Lee Singleton, and Wade H. Goodridge"
title = "Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations"
booktitle = "2019 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2019"
month = "June"
address = "Tampa, Florida"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/32675}
number = {10.18260/1-2--32675}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - In teaching mechanics, we use multiple representations of vectors to develop concepts and analysis techniques.  These representations include pictorials, diagrams, symbols, numbers and narrative language.  Through years of study as students, researchers, and teachers, we develop a fluency rooted in a deep conceptual understanding of what each representation communicates.  Many novice learners, however, struggle to gain such understanding and rely on superficial mimicry of the problem solving procedures we demonstrate in examples.  The term representational competence refers to the ability to interpret, switch between, and use multiple representations of a concept as appropriate for learning, communication and analysis.  In engineering statics, an understanding of what each vector representation communicates and how to use different representations in problem solving is important to the development of both conceptual and procedural knowledge.  Science education literature identifies representational competence as a marker of true conceptual understanding.    

This paper presents development work for a new assessment instrument designed to measure representational competence with vectors in an engineering mechanics context.  We developed the assessment over two successive terms in statics courses at a community college, a medium-sized regional university, and a large state university.  We started with twelve multiple-choice questions that survey the vector representations commonly employed in statics.  Each question requires the student to interpret and/or use two or more different representations of vectors and requires no calculation beyond single digit integer arithmetic.  Distractor answer choices include common student mistakes and misconceptions drawn from the literature and from our teaching experience.  We piloted these twelve questions as a timed section of the first exam in fall 2018 statics courses at both Whatcom Community College (WCC) and Western Washington University.  Analysis of students’ unprompted use of vector representations on the open-ended problem-solving section of the same exam provides evidence of the assessment’s validity as a measurement instrument for representational competence.  We found a positive correlation between students’ accurate and effective use of representations and their score on the multiple choice test.   We gathered additional validity evidence by reviewing student responses on an exam wrapper reflection. We used item difficulty and item discrimination scores (point-biserial correlation) to eliminate two questions and revised the remaining questions to improve clarity and discriminatory power.  We administered the revised version in two contexts: (1) again as part of the first exam in the winter 2019 Statics course at WCC, and (2) as an extra credit opportunity for statics students at Utah State University.  This paper includes sample questions from the assessment to illustrate the approach.  The full assessment is available to interested instructors and researchers through an online tool.



AU  - Eric Davishahl
AU  - Todd R. Haskell
AU  - Jill Davishahl
AU  - Lee Singleton
AU  - Wade H. Goodridge
CY  - Tampa, Florida
DA  - 2019/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Do They Understand Your Language?  Assess Their Fluency with Vector Representations
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/32675
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--32675
ER  -