Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
Professional Skills and Community Building in Chemical Engineering Education
12
10.18260/1-2--40818
https://peer.asee.org/40818
401
Dr. Vanessa Svihla is an associate professor at the University of New Mexico (UNM) with appointments in learning sciences and engineering. Her research, funded by an NSF CAREER award, focuses on how people learn as they frame problems and how these activities relate to identity, agency and creativity.
Dr. Yan Chen is a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Her research interests focus on computer supported collaborative learning, learning sciences, online learning and teaching, and educational equity for multicultural/multiethnic education.
I am a graduate student at the University of New Mexico in learning sciences with a background in materials engineering and in chemistry and an interest in STEM education and informal learning and agency
Despite decades of calls for both broadening participation in engineering and for STEM faculty to adopt evidence-based teaching practices, change is notoriously slow. In response to an NSF call for projects that could accomplish such efforts, our chemical engineering department proposed FACETS (Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transforming Society) with a vision of supporting our diverse students to be prepared to address the grand challenges of the 21st century. Our longitudinal analysis suggests that our approach has fostered persistence, especially among first-generation Latinx students. Now, at the end of our project, we report on evidence of sustained change and offer insights and implications for others interested in making change. Specifically, we synthesize the following guidelines: (1) Planned change theory, like Kotter's change model, is an accessible place to start, but don’t expect the change process to be linear. (2) Embed a community of practice in existing structures and norms, such as faculty meetings. Be creative in bringing discussions of teaching into such spaces. (3) Develop multidimensional measures of student assets, growth, and development. Staying only with measures of progress on conceptual learning misses much about students' development as chemical engineers. With regard to supporting students, we also share two key strategies: (4) When teaching technical communication, offer limited but specific feedback and require revision and reflection. (5) If developing design challenges, create low-bar entry experiences that are relevant, but that have high-ceilinged, open-ended solutions.
Svihla, V., & Chi, E., & Datye, A., & Chen, Y., & Han, S., & Hubka, C., & Gomez, J., & Wilson-Fetrow, M., & Davis, S. (2022, August), Insights and Outcomes from a Revolution in a Chemical Engineering Department Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40818
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015