Stapleton, P., & Blanchard, J. (2022, August), Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity  Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41223

\bibitem{asee_peer_41223}
  Stapleton, P., \& Blanchard, J. (2022, August), \emph{Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity}
  Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Minneapolis, MN.
  10.18260/1-2--41223

Patriel Stapleton and Jeremiah Blanchard.  "Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity".  2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022, August.  ASEE Conferences, 2022.  https://peer.asee.org/41223 Internet.  22 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_41223}
  Patriel Stapleton and Jeremiah Blanchard.
  "Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity".
  \emph{2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022, August}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2022.
  https://peer.asee.org/41223 Internet.  22 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_41223
author = "Patriel Stapleton and Jeremiah Blanchard"
title = "Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity"
booktitle = "2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2022"
month = "August"
address = "Minneapolis, MN"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/41223}
number = {10.18260/1-2--41223}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Many in academia perceive that remotely proctored exams allow more opportunities for a student to cheat than in-person testing. We introduced the use of the side-facing camera arrangement to increase the integrity of remote proctored exams by expanding the view of the examinee’s environment and therefore reducing the opportunities to cheat. The side-facing camera arrangement displays the examinee’s head, torso, hands, and keyboard and therefore should make behaviors consistent with cheating more obvious. This alternate camera arrangement serves as an environment camera in addition to monitoring the student throughout the exam. This paper is a report on the continued work to assess the efficacy of the side-facing camera arrangement. We followed up on our successful deployment of the side-facing camera in a large online class by examining how the attitudes and perceptions of students vary between the two camera arrangements. In Spring 2021, we asked students to complete pre- and post-surveys from three different classes and found that most students were not negatively impacted by the camera arrangement used. We qualitatively coded the students’ responses to identified themes among them. Most of the respondents surveyed didn’t have any preference towards the camera arrangement used in remote testing. After the post-survey, more students expressed that they felt there was a higher sense of integrity when using the side-facing camera arrangement. Students also reported that they had a difficult time setting up the side-facing camera arrangement, but all students who were required to use the side-facing camera arrangement were able to do so. Students also expressed some concern about their physical privacy when using the side-facing camera. Our ongoing work seeks to address the concerns we identified in our assessment of the surveys while increasing the integrity of remote proctored exams as well as the comfortability of students.
AU  - Patriel Stapleton
AU  - Jeremiah Blanchard
CY  - Minneapolis, MN
DA  - 2022/08/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Work In Progress: Side-Facing Cameras and Remote Proctoring Integrity
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/41223
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--41223
ER  -