Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
15
10.18260/1-2--41700
https://peer.asee.org/41700
951
Abstract: This paper presents the application of a science and technology studies (STS) teaching strategy we call STS postures (Schumacher 1989; Tomblin and Mogul 2020) to engineering courses. STS postures involve integrating three modes of doing that encourages engineering students to have agency in their education and careers: 1) Body/Mind fusion; 2) Data collection techniques; and 3) Systems thinking skills. STS postures takes a traditionally passive educational environment and introduces movement to the engineering curriculum. Instead of sitting in seats in the classroom, we encourage them to move about. We try out different ways of holding ourselves and moving (literally our bodies) in relation to each other, STS, engineering, education, and technological artifacts. We hold that this change in posture is key to having agency in directing the future of science and technology. The Body/Mind fusion is a corrective to thinking in science and engineering that separates the body from the mind, which reinforces counterproductive ideologies (e.g., depolitizication, Czech 2013) and mindsets (e.g., technical narrowness, “the myth of objectivity,” Riley 2008; Leydens and Lucena 2018) in engineering. Instead, we encourage students to connect intellectual endeavors with emotions, performance, proprioception, interoception, metacognition, and play. Data collection itself is a form of movement that involves students in several BodyMind exercises at once. It helps students to visualize the world as socio-technical systems full of politics, culture, and social relationships. We offer a broad pallet of qualitative data collection techniques that include document analysis, interviews, natural observation, participant observation, focus groups, visual image analysis, and metaphor analysis. These skills help students embrace a systems thinking mindset that involves understanding how to: 1) listen contextually; 2) find ethics in artifacts; 3) make meaning; 4) seek stories about science and technology’s past, present, and future; 5) locate power in systems; 6) ask STS questions; and 7) host STS parties. We reason that if students can take some of these data collection skills and mindsets into their engineering classrooms, internships, and careers, we will have given them life-long tools of interruption for responsibly interrogating their interactions with science and technology. This paper provides several STS Posture activities applied to a required engineering ethics course.
Tomblin, D., & Mogul, N. (2022, August), STS Postures: Changing How Undergraduate Engineering Students Move Through the World Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--41700
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015