Asee peer logo

A Framework for CAD Design Projects: Combining Scaffolded Milestones, Design Review, and Reflection

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

July 12, 2024

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 3: Advancements in Teaching Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Division

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46441

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Jamie Szwalek The University of Illinois at Chicago

visit author page

Jamie Szwalek is currently a Clinical Associate Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago in Mechanical Engineering and has over ten years of teaching experience.

visit author page

author page

Christopher Carducci The University of Illinois at Chicago Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0009-0000-6400-7322

Download Paper |

Abstract

This paper provides a framework for instructors to maximize student learning and communication skills in a third year mechanical engineering course that uses computer aided drafting (CAD) for a design project. The current framework mirrors the review process that takes place in industry and motivates students to keep up with major deadlines. Students need to learn how to accept feedback, review other’s work, and communicate their designs to be successful in industry. The framework has been developed over three semesters and incorporates scaffolded milestones, (peer) design reviews, and reflection. This paper presents instructor observations of lessons learned and graduate TA observations from lab with the goal of making the framework accessible to other instructors of design. The main research questions in this paper include: 1) How open are students to the design review process? 2) Which helped students to maintain steady progress on their project: scaffolded milestones, design review assignments, or both? 3) Did students benefit from design review and how? Did it impact their project or skill set? 4) Did design review affect their engineering design identity? Do they see themselves as designers? To determine effectiveness of the framework, an anonymous Qualtrics survey has been developed and administered to students to determine the impact on their learning experiences, skills, and engineering identity. The survey results indicate that students are receptive to constructive feedback and open to a (peer) design review process. Overall, both the students’ design work and skills have benefitted; students can develop design solutions, effectively communicate design, evaluate designs, and recognize changes needed for the solution to work. Using the design review process has helped increase student learning and positively affected their communication skills.

Szwalek, J., & Carducci, C. (2024, June), A Framework for CAD Design Projects: Combining Scaffolded Milestones, Design Review, and Reflection Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46441

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015