Board 386: S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers - Lessons Learned from a Four-Year Cohort

Indira Chatterjee; Kelsey Scalaro; Ann-Marie Vollstedt; Ivy Chin; Joseph Bozsik; Julia M. Williams; Adam Kirn

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Portland, Oregon
Publication Date: June 23, 2024
Start Date: June 23, 2024
End Date: July 12, 2024
Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Tagged Topic: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Page Count: 5
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--46971
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/46971
Download Count: 10

Paper Authors

biography

Indira Chatterjee University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Indira Chatterjee has been with the University of Nevada, Reno since 1988. She is a Professor of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, and has served as Associate Dean of Engineering since 2010. Currently she oversees undergraduate and graduate education, including recruitment, retention and advising. She has won many awards including Foundation Professor, Tibbitts University Distinguished Teacher Award, the Hoeper Award for Excellence in Teaching and Advising, Society of Women Engineers Region A Service Award, the IEEE Student Section Award for Excellence in Teaching, the Nevada Women's Fund "Women of Achievement" award and the Silver Compass Award for Extraordinary Commitment to Students. She has had over 7 million research funding in Bioelectromagnetics and engineering education. She has served as research mentor to postdoctoral fellows and many graduate students.

visit author page

biography

Kelsey Scalaro University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Kelsey is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. There she completed her Bachelorâ€™s and is working on her Master of Science in mechanical engineering. Her research focuses are on undergraduate engine

visit author page

biography

Ann-Marie Vollstedt University of Nevada, Reno

visit author page

Ann-Marie Vollstedt is a teaching associate professor for the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno (UNR). Dr. Vollstedt completed her dissertation at UNR, which focused on exploring the use of statistical process control methods to assess course changes in order to increase student learning in engineering. Dr. Vollstedt teaches courses in engineering design as well as statics and runs the Engineering Freshmen Intensive Training Program. She is the recipient of the Paul and Judy Bible Teaching Excellence Award, F. Donald Tibbitt's Distinguished Teaching Award, The Nevada Women's Fun Woman of Achievement Award, and the UNR College of Engineering Excellence Award.

visit author page

author page

Ivy Chin University of Nevada, Reno

author page

Joseph Bozsik University of Nevada, Reno

biography

Julia M. Williams Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology orcid.org/0000-0002-8367-9463

visit author page

Dr. Julia M. Williams is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is the author of Making Changes in STEM Education: The Change Maker's Toolkit (Routledge 2023).

visit author page

biography

Adam Kirn University of Nevada, Reno orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-5072

visit author page

Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

The S-STEM project entitled “Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers (CREATE)” was designed to support low-income, high achieving students achieve academic success, persist to graduation, build self-efficacy, and develop engineering identity. The scholarship-based cohort program is located within the College of Engineering at a large western land-grant university and recruited two cohorts of 16 based on academic talent and demonstrated financial need [1 – 6]. The program has retained 25 of the original 32 students (referred to as scholars) with six new scholars filling vacancies, leading to a current total of 31 scholars in the program. Current scholars identify as 21 male, 10 female, 18 white, 7 Hispanic, 1 Black, and 5 Asian. Program numbers mirror similar enrollment trends to the College with the following exceptions: higher female and students of color enrolled. The scholars in both cohorts participated in a rigorous set of curricular and co-curricular activities that included enrollment in a summer bridge program, proactive advising, tutoring in engineering courses, peer and faculty mentoring, career and graduate school guidance, cohort building activities, theme seminars, funded undergraduate research experiences, and goals workshops. Cohort 1 started during the fall 2019 semester and cohort 2 started a year later during fall of 2020 and had different first-year experiences as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Scholars from both cohorts participated in bi-semester quantitative surveys and end-of-semester focus groups which allowed them to describe how they were using resources provided by the CREATE program, and how they were developing as engineering students. These focus groups were transcribed, group coded using directed content analysis, and underwent thematic analysis where themes and patterns were then discussed with the larger project team who had close interactions with the scholars. We present qualitative findings that illustrate the lessons learned in operating this program for four years and successfully supporting 12 cohort 1 scholars to graduation: Lessons learned at the end of four years include: (1) Proactive advising could be done for all four years as it remained useful in helping scholars stay on track to graduation and reaching their career goals; (2) Progress reports used as part of proactive advising promoted beneficial interactions between scholars and faculty, and hence reduced barriers to future interactions for the scholar; (3) Scholars could have a peer mentor for just the first two years, unless they are matched by their majors. The exception to this is first generation scholars who benefit from peer mentors for the first three years; (4) Scholars should have faculty mentors for all four years as they derive emotional support early on and then career and goals support later in the program; (5) Placement in summer bridge programs that facilitate shared, group experiences could be used to support a long-lasting and resilient shared sense of community within the cohort; (6) Cohorts could include scholars all from the same major as scholars described challenges keeping in contact with or feeling connected to scholars in different majors once they stopped taking the same common classes. (7) The College of Engineering career services director who was part of the CREATE program management team could have been involved earlier to better support the scholars as they think about and work towards goals early on. These lessons learned have implications for future programs looking to develop their own cohort or mentorship programs at their institution. References 1. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe and A. Kirn, “A two-step model for the interpretation of meaningful recognition”, Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Virtual Conference, July 26-29, 2021. 2. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Is this the real life? Exploring how virtual learning environments influence engineering identity”, Proceedings of the Frontiers of Engineering Conference, 2021, October 13-16, 2021, Lincoln, Nebraska. 3. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “From knowledge to doing: Changes in performance/competence beliefs of developing engineers”, Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 26 – 29, 2022, Minneapolis, MN. 4. I. Chatterjee, K. Scalaro, A-M. Vollstedt, J. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “S-STEM: Creating retention and engagement in academically talented engineers”, Proceedings of the 2021 Virtual ASEE Conference & Exposition. 5. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Engineering interests dynamic major pathways”, Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Conference & Exposition, June 24 – 28, 2023, Baltimore, MD. 6. K. Steinhorst, R. Young, K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J. C. LaCombe, and A. Kirn, “Creating social capital: Developing resources in a cohort program”, abstract submitted to the 2023 ASEE Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.

Citation
Format

Chatterjee, I., & Scalaro, K., & Vollstedt, A., & Chin, I., & Bozsik, J., & Williams, J. M., & Kirn, A. (2024, June), Board 386: S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers - Lessons Learned from a Four-Year Cohort Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46971

TY - CPAPER
AB - The S-STEM project entitled “Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers (CREATE)” was designed to support low-income, high achieving students achieve academic success, persist to graduation, build self-efficacy, and develop engineering identity. The scholarship-based cohort program is located within the College of Engineering at a large western land-grant university and recruited two cohorts of 16 based on academic talent and demonstrated financial need [1 – 6]. The program has retained 25 of the original 32 students (referred to as scholars) with six new scholars filling vacancies, leading to a current total of 31 scholars in the program. Current scholars identify as 21 male, 10 female, 18 white, 7 Hispanic, 1 Black, and 5 Asian. Program numbers mirror similar enrollment trends to the College with the following exceptions: higher female and students of color enrolled. The scholars in both cohorts participated in a rigorous set of curricular and co-curricular activities that included enrollment in a summer bridge program, proactive advising, tutoring in engineering courses, peer and faculty mentoring, career and graduate school guidance, cohort building activities, theme seminars, funded undergraduate research experiences, and goals workshops.
Cohort 1 started during the fall 2019 semester and cohort 2 started a year later during fall of 2020 and had different first-year experiences as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. Scholars from both cohorts participated in bi-semester quantitative surveys and end-of-semester focus groups which allowed them to describe how they were using resources provided by the CREATE program, and how they were developing as engineering students. These focus groups were transcribed, group coded using directed content analysis, and underwent thematic analysis where themes and patterns were then discussed with the larger project team who had close interactions with the scholars.
We present qualitative findings that illustrate the lessons learned in operating this program for four years and successfully supporting 12 cohort 1 scholars to graduation: Lessons learned at the end of four years include: (1) Proactive advising could be done for all four years as it remained useful in helping scholars stay on track to graduation and reaching their career goals; (2) Progress reports used as part of proactive advising promoted beneficial interactions between scholars and faculty, and hence reduced barriers to future interactions for the scholar; (3) Scholars could have a peer mentor for just the first two years, unless they are matched by their majors. The exception to this is first generation scholars who benefit from peer mentors for the first three years; (4) Scholars should have faculty mentors for all four years as they derive emotional support early on and then career and goals support later in the program; (5) Placement in summer bridge programs that facilitate shared, group experiences could be used to support a long-lasting and resilient shared sense of community within the cohort; (6) Cohorts could include scholars all from the same major as scholars described challenges keeping in contact with or feeling connected to scholars in different majors once they stopped taking the same common classes. (7) The College of Engineering career services director who was part of the CREATE program management team could have been involved earlier to better support the scholars as they think about and work towards goals early on. These lessons learned have implications for future programs looking to develop their own cohort or mentorship programs at their institution.
References
1. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe and A. Kirn, “A two-step model for the interpretation of meaningful recognition”, Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Virtual Conference, July 26-29, 2021.
2. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Is this the real life? Exploring how virtual learning environments influence engineering identity”, Proceedings of the Frontiers of Engineering Conference, 2021, October 13-16, 2021, Lincoln, Nebraska.
3. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “From knowledge to doing: Changes in performance/competence beliefs of developing engineers”, Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Conference &amp;amp; Exposition, June 26 – 29, 2022, Minneapolis, MN.
4. I. Chatterjee, K. Scalaro, A-M. Vollstedt, J. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “S-STEM: Creating retention and engagement in academically talented engineers”, Proceedings of the 2021 Virtual ASEE Conference &amp;amp; Exposition.
5. K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J.L. Lacombe, A. Kirn, “Engineering interests dynamic major pathways”, Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Conference &amp;amp; Exposition, June 24 – 28, 2023, Baltimore, MD.
6. K. Steinhorst, R. Young, K. Scalaro, I. Chatterjee, A-M. Vollstedt, J. C. LaCombe, and A. Kirn, “Creating social capital: Developing resources in a cohort program”, abstract submitted to the 2023 ASEE Conference &amp;amp; Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.

AU - Indira Chatterjee
AU - Kelsey Scalaro
AU - Ann-Marie Vollstedt
AU - Ivy Chin
AU - Joseph Bozsik
AU - Julia M. Williams
AU - Adam Kirn
CY - Portland, Oregon
DA - 2024/06/23
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Board 386: S-STEM: Creating Retention and Engagement for Academically Talented Engineers - Lessons Learned from a Four-Year Cohort
UR - https://peer.asee.org/46971
DO - 10.18260/1-2--46971
ER -