Social and environmental justice in the STEM classroom: How do STEM instructors relate to the impact of their engineering work before and after a critical pedagogy intervention?
- Conference
- Location
-
Portland, Oregon
- Publication Date
-
June 23, 2024
- Start Date
-
June 23, 2024
- End Date
-
June 26, 2024
- Conference Session
- Tagged Divisions
-
Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)
- Page Count
-
8
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--47979
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/47979
- Download Count
-
68
Paper Authors
Jorge Andrés Cristancho Purdue Engineering Education
Jorge A. Cristancho studied Electronic and Computer Engineering and using bioinspired methods, he
received a master’s in Electronic Engineering and Computers on Control and Automation at Los Andes University. Curious about teaching, he formally started as a teaching assistant in 2011 and continued as a teacher at three different universities in Colombia. He is a second-year Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He keeps a balanced life connecting with nature, staying mentally, physically, spiritually, and socially active, constantly learning and reflecting, and challenging himself to improve. He is interested in learning/teaching collectively, engineering philosophy, and social and environmental justice. His purpose is to help people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world.
Leonardo Pollettini Marcos Purdue University
Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 3rd-year PhD student at Purdue University's engineering education program. He completed a bachelor's and a master's degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in assessment instruments and engineering accreditation processes.
eugene leo draine mahmoud Mt. San Antonio Community College and Purdue University
eugene is a Professor of Physics and Engineering and an educational researcher at Mt. San Antonio College (Mt. SAC). He studied Aerospace Engineering with a minor in Ethnic Studies from the University of California, San Diego; and Mechanical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology. Currently, he serves as the chair for the California Engineering Liaison Council and a graduate research assitant in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education
Abstract
Background: Engineering is often disconnected from social and environmental realities. Most engineering work is focused on optimizing company profits and not as it should be, improving the well-being of people and the Ecosystem. Numerous researchers have shown how the disconnection between engineering solutions and social and environmental realities affects people, mainly those from underrepresented groups. For example, Ruha Benjamin [1] denounces how technology and artificial calculators (aka. artificial intelligence) are not neutral tools but instead are codified with racial biases and hierarchies. She even uses the term “Jim Code” to define these new ways of racial oppression. Technology and engineering applications should not fall into the reinforcing of racism that Umoja Noble [2] and Ruha Benjamin [1] denounce . We argue that if engineering education were to explicitly include social and environmental justice in their curriculum, students would be more aware of the implications of our engineering work. Thus, students would be able to create more holistic solutions for people and the Ecosystem. Purpose: This work in progress is the first step of a series of studies that seek to explore instructors’ understandings and beliefs while incorporating a critical lens in their classrooms. The critical lens is meant to guide students through the inquiry of the impact of their engineering process on themselves, other people, and the Ecosystem. Research questions: How do STEM instructors relate to the impact of their engineering work before and after a critical pedagogy intervention? Method: We are conducting the study with STEM instructors. We plan on analyzing the data through thematic analysis based on Paulo Freire’s [3] critical Pedagogy and the Mycorrhiza framework [4]. We will analyze the perceptions of instructors implementing these methods in their classrooms and how the framework aligns with their beliefs. This study uses multiple sources of data from instructors' open-ended interviews, module adaptation, and reflections. The preliminary plan is to analyze the instructor’s responses before going through a critical pedagogy intervention. The second phase of the study consists of implementing the modules into the instructors' classroom, followed by guided questions to understand how students change their perception of their social and environmental impact. We will analyze the data to explore how students' awareness of social and environmental justice might change after a critical pedagogy intervention.
Cristancho, J. A., & Pollettini Marcos, L., & mahmoud, E. L. D. (2024, June), Social and environmental justice in the STEM classroom: How do STEM instructors relate to the impact of their engineering work before and after a critical pedagogy intervention? Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47979
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015