Catalyzing Sociotechnical Thinking: Exploring Engineering Students’ Changing Perception of Racism in Automation during a First-Year Computation Course
- Conference
- Location
-
Portland, Oregon
- Publication Date
-
June 23, 2024
- Start Date
-
June 23, 2024
- End Date
-
July 12, 2024
- Conference Session
-
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Evolving First Year Programs
- Tagged Division
-
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
- Tagged Topic
-
Diversity
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/48448
Paper Authors
Kaylla Cantilina
Tufts University
orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-8617
Kaylla is a Postdoctoral Scholar at Tufts University where her work is motivated by design as a means for social justice. Her research explores the ways that students and practitioners seek to achieve equity in their design practices.
Ethan E. Danahy
Tufts University
orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-8031
Dr. Ethan Danahy is a Research Associate Professor at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) with secondary appointment in the Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging students in the STEAM content areas, he focuses his investigations on enhancing creativity and innovation, supporting better documentation, and encouraging collaborative learning.
Abstract
This Complete Evidence-based Practice paper describes first-year engineering students’ perceptions, and specifically their shifts in those perspectives, towards the role of automation and data science in society as well as the racial implications of how those human-made systems are implemented and deployed. As part of a larger curricular change being made to a first-year engineering course in computation, this paper specifically examines two reflection assignments where students wrote, at different points in in the semester (week 2 and week 12), regarding their own personal questions and understandings related to the role of machine learning, artificial intelligence, and automation in society and its relationship to systemic racism and racial impact of engineering and technological systems. For analysis, the submissions were compiled, and comparisons of the two moments in the semester were coded and analyzed for thematic commonalities seen in student written responses and the overall progression of students’ thinking. Results showed commonalities amongst students' initial reactions to the video such as questions surrounding who is responsible for the impact of designed technologies along with a strong ideological separation between humans and machines. Juxtaposed with the week 2 assignments, week 12 findings showed commonalities in students’ progress such as an increased awareness of the complexity of racialized sociotechnical problems, stronger emotional responses, more refined ideas about potential solutions, and realizing the systemic nature of racism. Findings suggest that the students met learning goals regarding an awareness of sociotechnical problems, and catalyzed (early) critical thinking on how to address them through engineering. Implications from this work demonstrate that first-year students are capable of wrestling with difficult topics such as racism in technology, while still meeting ABET requirements within the course for data science and coding.
Cantilina, K., & Danahy, E. E. (2024, June), Catalyzing Sociotechnical Thinking: Exploring Engineering Students’ Changing Perception of Racism in Automation during a First-Year Computation Course Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/48448
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015