Development of a Unique Bioengineering Laboratory Curriculum Focused on Material Characterization of Musculoskeletal Tissues

Jenni Buckley; Aisley Bergdoll; Kyle Alexander Crawford; Nikos Demetris Demetriou; Laura Alison Weinstein; Chelsea Davis; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney; Amy Posch; Amelia Lanier Knarr; Elise Corbin

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date: June 22, 2025
Start Date: June 22, 2025
End Date: August 15, 2025
Conference Session: Innovative Approaches to Biomedical Engineering Education
Tagged Division: Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
Page Count: 10
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/56276
Download Count: 1

Paper Authors

biography

Jenni Buckley University of Delaware

visit author page

Dr. Jenni Buckley is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Her teaching practice is focused on product design, (bio)mechanics, CAD, and technical communications; and her recent research work is centered on DEI and curriculum development related to hands-on design and laboratory experiences.

visit author page

author page

Dr. Sarah I. Rooney is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Delaware. Dr. Rooney’s efforts center around developing and teaching courses in the undergraduate BME curriculum and facilitating continuous improvement of the program.

visit author page

author page

Amy Posch Pacific Research Labs

author page

Amelia Lanier Knarr The Perry Initiative

author page

Elise Corbin University of Delaware

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Bioengineering undergraduate programs feature one or more courses that stress core concepts in Mechanics of Solids (MOS) and Materials Science in order for students to have a foundation to understand and characterize the behavior of engineered and biological materials. Ideally, these core concepts are reinforced through hands-on laboratory exercises that investigate the mechanical properties of materials and simultaneously reinforce skills in experimental design, data analysis, and technical communication. Ideally, these laboratory experiences would involve real-world applications relevant to bioengineering practice, which could be accomplished by integrating biomaterials into lab exercises or highlighting some of the unique aspects of biological materials, including nonlinearity, time-dependency, and changes in material behavior with injury or disease. There are excellent textbooks that provide a theoretical foundation for understanding biomaterials as well as instructor guides and technical standards for experimental protocols; however, there are few resources for instructors who wish to implement hands-on biomaterial laboratory exercises. While some institutions develop their own biomaterials labs, they often face challenges around high setup and maintenance costs, as well as biosafety concerns if using actual biological tissue samples. There is a growing need for a biomaterials laboratory curriculum that integrates core concepts from MOS and Materials Science, highlights the distinctive properties of biomaterials, and addresses the common barriers to real-world lab implementation.

In this paper, we present the development and implementation of a unique set of laboratory exercises, collectively entitled Musculoskeletal Tissue Characterization (MTC), that reinforce mechanics of solids and biomaterials concepts through the lens of musculoskeletal tissue mechanics. MTC can serve as the core of a stand-alone laboratory course, or it can be used to complement theory-based coursework in biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, or materials science. At present, there are three MTC exercises, namely: (1) compression testing of trabecular bone cores of varying densities to characterize the strength-density relationship; (2) tensile testing of tendon to compare the nonlinear response of healthy versus degenerative states; and (3) confined compression testing of meniscus to characterize the viscoelastic response in healthy versus degenerative states. These exercises may be offered in any order or combination within a course; and the conceptual framework, data analysis, and technical communications elements of MTC can be scaled to both the undergraduate and graduate levels.

Equally as important as the curricular elements of these unique labs, MTC labs utilize equipment and consumables that have been thoughtfully designed to address common “pain points” associated with hands-on biomaterials exercises. Specifically, all lab exercises utilize an economical, table-top mechanical test frame (Model TSAH, Mark-10), instead of full-scale testing systems (e.g., MTS or Instron) that are orders of magnitude more expensive. The price point of these table-top test frames makes it possible to purchase multiple units for a single course, thereby allowing students to work more independently in smaller groups. All MTS labs use surrogate tissue samples made by a leading anatomical modeling manufacturer (Sawbones®, Pacific Research Labs), rather than biological samples. In doing so, MTS labs are not constrained to use biosafety laboratories, protocols, and supplies; and the surrogate tissue samples yield more consistent experimental results than biological samples. All equipment and supplies are easily sourced from commercial vendors (Mark-10 and Sawbones®); and the curriculum will soon be available free and open-source.

In this paper, we will highlight key curricular and logistical elements of the MTS laboratory exercises; and we will also present the results from field testing of these labs in undergraduate and graduate-level bioengineering and mechanical engineering courses at partner institutions as well as our own. Field testing will include both instructor and student interviews, as well as examination of student lab reports and data sets. Interview data will be subjected to thematic analysis, and student work will be evaluated by multiple instructors using common rubrics. The results of this study will be used to further refine the MTS curriculum and, more broadly, to advocate for the development and implementation of hands-on biomaterials laboratory exercises in engineering programs nationwide.

Citation
Format

Buckley, J., & Bergdoll, A., & Crawford, K. A., & Demetriou, N. D., & Weinstein, L. A., & Davis, C., & Rooney, S. I., & Posch, A., & Knarr, A. L., & Corbin, E. (2025, June), Development of a Unique Bioengineering Laboratory Curriculum Focused on Material Characterization of Musculoskeletal Tissues Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . https://peer.asee.org/56276

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Bioengineering undergraduate programs feature one or more courses that stress core concepts in Mechanics of Solids (MOS) and Materials Science in order for students to have a foundation to understand and characterize the behavior of engineered and biological materials. Ideally, these core concepts are reinforced through hands-on laboratory exercises that investigate the mechanical properties of materials and simultaneously reinforce skills in experimental design, data analysis, and technical communication. Ideally, these laboratory experiences would involve real-world applications relevant to bioengineering practice, which could be accomplished by integrating biomaterials into lab exercises or highlighting some of the unique aspects of biological materials, including nonlinearity, time-dependency, and changes in material behavior with injury or disease. There are excellent textbooks that provide a theoretical foundation for understanding biomaterials as well as instructor guides and technical standards for experimental protocols; however, there are few resources for instructors who wish to implement hands-on biomaterial laboratory exercises. While some institutions develop their own biomaterials labs, they often face challenges around high setup and maintenance costs, as well as biosafety concerns if using actual biological tissue samples. There is a growing need for a biomaterials laboratory curriculum that integrates core concepts from MOS and Materials Science, highlights the distinctive properties of biomaterials, and addresses the common barriers to real-world lab implementation.

In this paper, we present the development and implementation of a unique set of laboratory exercises, collectively entitled Musculoskeletal Tissue Characterization (MTC), that reinforce mechanics of solids and biomaterials concepts through the lens of musculoskeletal tissue mechanics. MTC can serve as the core of a stand-alone laboratory course, or it can be used to complement theory-based coursework in biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, or materials science. At present, there are three MTC exercises, namely: (1) compression testing of trabecular bone cores of varying densities to characterize the strength-density relationship; (2) tensile testing of tendon to compare the nonlinear response of healthy versus degenerative states; and (3) confined compression testing of meniscus to characterize the viscoelastic response in healthy versus degenerative states. These exercises may be offered in any order or combination within a course; and the conceptual framework, data analysis, and technical communications elements of MTC can be scaled to both the undergraduate and graduate levels. 

Equally as important as the curricular elements of these unique labs, MTC labs utilize equipment and consumables that have been thoughtfully designed to address common “pain points” associated with hands-on biomaterials exercises. Specifically, all lab exercises utilize an economical, table-top mechanical test frame (Model TSAH, Mark-10), instead of full-scale testing systems (e.g., MTS or Instron) that are orders of magnitude more expensive. The price point of these table-top test frames makes it possible to purchase multiple units for a single course, thereby allowing students to work more independently in smaller groups. All MTS labs use surrogate tissue samples made by a leading anatomical modeling manufacturer (Sawbones®, Pacific Research Labs), rather than biological samples. In doing so, MTS labs are not constrained to use biosafety laboratories, protocols, and supplies; and the surrogate tissue samples yield more consistent experimental results than biological samples. All equipment and supplies are easily sourced from commercial vendors (Mark-10 and Sawbones®); and the curriculum will soon be available free and open-source.

In this paper, we will highlight key curricular and logistical elements of the MTS laboratory exercises; and we will also present the results from field testing of these labs in undergraduate and graduate-level bioengineering and mechanical engineering courses at partner institutions as well as our own. Field testing will include both instructor and student interviews, as well as examination of student lab reports and data sets. Interview data will be subjected to thematic analysis, and student work will be evaluated by multiple instructors using common rubrics. The results of this study will be used to further refine the MTS curriculum and, more broadly, to advocate for the development and implementation of hands-on biomaterials laboratory exercises in engineering programs nationwide.

AU  - Jenni Buckley
AU  - Aisley Bergdoll
AU  - Kyle Alexander Crawford
AU  - Nikos Demetris Demetriou
AU  - Laura Alison Weinstein
AU  - Chelsea Davis
AU  - Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney
AU  - Amy Posch
AU  - Amelia Lanier Knarr
AU  - Elise Corbin
CY  - Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
DA  - 2025/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Development of a Unique Bioengineering Laboratory Curriculum Focused on Material Characterization of Musculoskeletal Tissues
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/56276
ER  -