Asee peer logo

Implementing Change: A Model For Closing The Continuous Improvement Loop The First Time And Every Time

Download Paper |

Conference

2001 Annual Conference

Location

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Publication Date

June 24, 2001

Start Date

June 24, 2001

End Date

June 27, 2001

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

10

Page Numbers

6.558.1 - 6.558.10

DOI

10.18260/1-2--9356

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/9356

Download Count

354

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Kamyar Haghighi

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2608

Implementing Change: A Model for Closing the Continuous Improvement Loop the First Time and Every Time Heidi Diefes-Dux, Kamyar Haghighi Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Abstract

This paper will highlight the process the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) is using to implement change and prepare for long-term assessment of its programs. Emphasis will be placed on continuous education of and open communication with the faculty, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and assessment plan/process improvement.

II. Assessment Process

After two years of faculty and staff education, assessment process development, and data collection, the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) at Purdue University is closing the loop on their first round of assessment for their two ABET accredited programs: Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) and Food Process Engineering (FPE). Figure 1 delineates the assessment process being adopted by the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE) at Purdue University. The two looped educational assessment process mirrors the two loops of EC2000 [1]. In the outer 3-5 year loop, the process allows constituents to provide input to and feedback on each ABE program. The faculty integrates this information into the ABE mission and vision statements, educational objectives, program outcomes (PO), performance criteria (PC), and, ultimately, the curriculum. The inner loop of the process focuses on course level evaluations and analysis of student and graduate performance followed by an assessment of gaps between the expected and actual student achievement levels. The loop is closed with a mechanism for instituting change to improve the program.

“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”

Haghighi, K., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2001, June), Implementing Change: A Model For Closing The Continuous Improvement Loop The First Time And Every Time Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 10.18260/1-2--9356

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015