Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University; Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Liat Rosenfeld, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

finding agrees with other surveys. One survey bySimpson Scarborough [3] of 513 students in March 2020 found that, among college students whotook the survey, “63% say online instruction is worse than the in-person instruction they receivedat their school.” A second survey at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine [4] found thatstudents reported that “their learning has worsened since the move to e-learning, with 44% ofstudents responding ‘somewhat worsened’ and 26% answering ‘significantly worsened.”Ithaka S+R, in partnership with 21 universities across the U.S., developed a student surveyfocused on institutional communications and support, curricular needs, safety and well-being,and fall retention [5]. 15,677 students completed the survey. The

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Katie Leanne Basinger, University of Florida; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Ariana Virginia Ortega; Daniel G Hartless, University of Florida; Behshad Lahijanian, University of Florida; Michelle M. Alvarado, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

throughplatform demos, usage trials, and Q&A sessions with the platform’s sales representatives. Wewill refer to the three used in the final evaluation as Platform 1, Platform 2, and Platform 3. Allthree of these do have the necessary interactivity capabilities to create active learning videos.Platform 1 was specifically created for education and can-do progression bar hotspots, branching(in-video), and multiple quiz formats. However, Platform 1’s use and campus integration isstructured for entire departments/institutions, and is only able to offer a cost estimate for theentire department, rather than on a course-by-course basis. The department proposal was tooexpensive to justify for piloting for one class. After explaining this to Platform 1’s team

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Celeste Chavis P.E., Morgan State University; Steve U. Efe, Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

courses for Pass/Fail (PS/FL) without the course impactingtheir overall GPA. Credit was received for passing a PS or P course; however, a traditional Fresulted in 0 grade points which lowered the student’s GPA. For graduate students, a passing gradeis considered an A or B, and for undergraduate students an A, B, or C grade. As shown in Table3, no graduate student received an FL grade. Pass (P) and Satisfactory (S) grades are primarilyreserved for thesis and dissertation courses. Graduate students performed slightly better during theCOVID pandemic months.For undergraduate students, the percentage of students who passed each semester was relativelyconsistent; see Table 4. Perhaps due to uncertainty with the fully remote learning environment,many

Conference Session

Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill ; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Debarati Basu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Michelle Soledad, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

inquiry, 2nd ed., N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. 2003, pp. 249–291.[8] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2003.[9] D. L. Morgan, “Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–76, 2007.[10] P. Shannon-Baker, “‘But I wanted to appear happy’: How using arts-informed and mixed methods approaches complicate qualitatively driven research on culture shock,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 34–52, 2015.[11] C. McCall and C. Edwards, “New Perspectives for Implementing Grounded Theory,” Stud. Eng. Educ., vol

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Goli Nossoni, University of New Haven; Emese Hadnagy, University of New Haven; Joseph A. Levert, University of New Haven; Junhui Zhao, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

for several years. She holds B.S. in Computer Engineering and M.S. in Industrial Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Binghamton University (SUNY). Her background and research interests are in quality and productivity improvement using statistical tools, lean methods and use of information technology in operations management. Her work is primarily in manufacturing and healthcare delivery operations.Dr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and Experiential

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo; Daniel Lepek, Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

accepted responses forseveral weeks.Results and DiscussionImpacts of the AIChE Education Division’s VCP program on the delivery of chemicalengineering courses during the COVID-19 pandemic were wide-ranging. After a web-basedinterest form was circulated to attendees and other members of the AIChE community,respondents answered whether they would like to participate in a VCP, to identify course(s) theywere teaching, and to indicate their willingness and ability to lead/moderate a VCP. Within oneweek, 88 faculty members filled out the form, and the communities began to materialize. Thetotal number of interested participants continued to grow through the semester and into thefollowing semester. From March 2020 to December 2020, 191 participants from

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Steven Edalgo, Clemson University; Karen A. High, Clemson University; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Cindy M. Lee, Clemson University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. (2018). African American social work faculty: Overcoming existing barriers and achieving research productivity. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(3), 309.2. Beech et al., (2013). Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: A systematic review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 88(4), 541.3. Butz, A. R., Spencer, K., Thayer-Hart, N., Cabrare, I. E., & Byars-Winston, A. (2018). Mentors’ motivation to address race/ethnicity in research mentoring relationships. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, doi:10.1037/dhe0000096.4. Byars-Winston, A., Gutierrez, B., Topp, S., & Carnes, M. (2011). Integrating theory and practice to increase scientific workforce diversity: A

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel; Daniel Gingerich, Ohio State University; Sneha Prabha Narra, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Casey I. Canfield, Missouri University of Science & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

activities. Author Laughton is in her first year at the Citadel, but is already thedepartment’s Chemical Hygiene Officer. Her role as Vice President of Campus Affairs in studentgovernment and her service on the EH&S Committee at a larger, research-focused institutionenabled her department to entrust her with the students’ laboratory safety. While she may still belearning the Citadel’s policies, she has sufficient context from her previous leadership roles toadapt quickly and begin to streamline procedures. While not core to Laughton’s career goals, herprevious experiences allow her to complete her role’s responsibilities with minimal time input.The most important reasons that a student participates in a student government organization

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky; Joseph H. Hammer, University of Kentucky; Ellen L. Usher, University of Kentucky

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

that faculty are not being effective in how they engage with students abouttheir mental health. Moving forward, faculty should be provided with resources and training sothat they feel prepared (even if not fully confident) to provide student support. They should beencouraged and empowered to advocate for their students through recognizing signs of distressand ensuring that students are getting the help that they need.References[1] H. Xiao et al., "Are we in crisis? National mental health and treatment trends in college counseling centers," Psychological Services, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 407-415, 2017, doi: 10.1037/ser0000130.[2] C. R. Kessler, P. G. Amminger, B. S. Aguilar-Gaxiola, B. J. Alonso, B. S. Lee, and B. T. Üstün, "Age

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Li Tan, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

mentor and benefits they derive from the process. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development. 22(1), 37–48.Bjursell, C., & Sädbom, R. F. (2018). Mentorship programs in the manufacturing industry. European Journal of Training and Development. 42(7/8), 455-469.Brown II, M. C., Davis, G. L., & McClendon, S. A. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105-118.Byars-Winston, A., Womack, V. Y., Butz, A. R., McGee, R., Quinn, S. C., Utzerath, E., ... & Thomas, S. B. (2018). Pilot study of an intervention to increase cultural awareness in research mentoring: Implications for diversifying the scientific workforce. Journal of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Abeera P. Rehmat, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

grant from the National Science Foundation # 2027471. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. Bourne, D. Harris, and F Mayadas, “Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 131-146, 2005.[2] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning,” Educause Review, vol. 27, 2020, [Online]. Available:https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between- emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.[3] L

Conference Session

Faculty Development 1: Social Justice Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Katie Johanson, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Richard Carroll Sinclair, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Comas Lamar Haynes, Georgia Tech Research Institute; Rosario A. Gerhardt, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

78 Urban Geography Match 2 Mentee Black Male 36 Mechanical Engineering Mentor White Male 69 Mechanical Engineering Match 3 Mentee Black Male 38 Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Mentor White Male 74 Biomedical, Chemical, and Biomolecular Engineering Match 4 Mentee Black Male 31 Mechanical Engineering Mentor White Male 84 Mechanical Engineering Match 5 Mentee Black Male 35 Mechanical Engineering Mentor S. Asian Male 73 Mechanical Engineering Match 6 Mentee Black Male 54 Manufacturing Engineering Technology Mentor White Male 76 Manufacturing

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo; Syed Ali Kamal, Independent Researcher

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

., “Engineering by the numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington D.C., 2017.[4] M. F. Fox, “Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering,” in Higher Education, J. C. Smart, Ed. Springer Netherlands, 2008, pp. 73–103.[5] D. Bilimoria, S. Joy, and X. Liang, “Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 423–441, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1002/hrm.20225.[6] S. R. Bird, “Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study Approach,” Gender, Work & Organization

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., NASA EPDC

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

advisingchallenge (2nd. Ed.) Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.[2] Noddings, N. (2016). Philosophy of education (4th Edition). New York: Routledge.[3] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.[4] Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practice ofmentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(1), 88-96.[5] Kram, K.E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.[6] Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). Theseasons of a man’s life. New York: Ballentine.[7] Marquez, E., Garcia Jr., S. (2019) Creating a

Conference Session

Faculty Development 1: Social Justice Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Henry Salgado, University of Texas at El Paso; Yamile A. Urquidi Cerros, University of Texas at El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

refinement and 2) class content ownership andstudent agency. When building autonomy by increasing student involvement in program andcourse refinement, participants suggested approaches such as allowing students to provide “inputon syllab[i]” and “feedback on different phases of project[s].” In the case of giving students classcontent ownership/student agency, participants expressed how students could be given autonomyby allowing them to “choose or create their own assignment,” by providing opportunities forstudents to “teach class one day,” as well as by "motivating” students to practice autonomy and“solve problems their own way."As observed in Alterman’s Circumplex Model, motivating teaching styles can be adopted toincrease students’ intrinsic

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education; Carolyn Wilson, Southeastern Universities Research Association

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/fedsupport/2018/.[3] J. C. Kelly, M. F. Chouikha, C. J. Scott, K. A. Connor, D. Geddis, M. Ndoye, S. Abraham, M. Velez-Reyes, S. Zein-Sabatto, and R. Yaqub, “The inclusive engineering consortium stakeholders workshop,” in ASEE’s Virtual Conference, June 2020.[4] J. Hemming, K. Eide, E. Harwood, R. Ali, Z. Zhu, J. Cutler and the National Research Mentoring Network Coachingi Group Directors, “Exploring professional development for new investigators underrepresented in the federal funded biomedical research workforce,” Ethnicity & Disease, vol 29, supplement 1, pp 123-128, 2019.[5] V. L. Shavers, P. Fagan, D. Lawrence, W. McCaskill-Stevens, P. McDonald, D. Browne, D. McLinden

Conference Session

Faculty Development 2: COVID-19 Impact on Faculty

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

on what contextual factors and supports help faculty adapt to new realities related to theCOVID-19 pandemic and best address the needs of students from underrepresented andunderserved communities across a broader variety of contexts.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1623105. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning” Educause Review, vol. 27, pp. 1-12, 2020.[2] F. Martin, K

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University; Sherecce Fields, Texas A&M University; Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Distant Education Resources, 2020. [2] T. Hammond, K. Watson, K. Brumbelow, S. Fields, K. Shryock, J.-F. Chamberland, L. Barosso, M. de Miranda, M. Johnson, G. Alexander, M. D. Childs, S. Ray, L. White, J. Cherian, A. Dunn, and B. Herbert, “A survey to measure the effects of forced transition to 100% online learning on community sharing, feelings of social isolation, equity, resilience, and learning content during the covid-19 pandemic,” Texas A&M University, Tech. Rep., 2020. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/187835 [3] J. M. Corbin and A. Strauss, “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria,” Qualitative sociology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 1990. [4] B. G. Glaser, Basics of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adithya Jayakumar, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Lucille Sheppard, Ohio State University; Shadia Siliman, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

cultivate classroom equity”, CBE—Life Sciences Education,12(3), pp. 322- 331, 2013.7. R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, “Learning & teaching styles in engineering education”. Engineering Education, 78(7), pp. 674-681, 1988.8. E.M. Bensimon, “The underestimated significance of practitioner knowledge in the scholarship on student success”, The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), pp.441-469, 2007.9. S. A. Ambrose, M.W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M.C. Lovett, and M.K. Norman, How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.10. D.M. Johnson, and J.A. Fox, “Creating curb cuts in the classroom: Adapting universal design principles to education.” Curriculum transformation and disability

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University; Lynn Hall, Ohio State University; David A. Delaine, Ohio State University; William Cohen, Ohio State University; James Edward Toney, Ohio State University; Lisa Abrams, Ohio State University; Alan Kalish, Ohio State University; Melinda Rhodes-DiSalvo, Ohio State University; Toni M. Calbert, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Paper ID #34922Creating a Peer Review of Teaching Process to Enhance InstructorFeedback in Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University Dr. Jennifer Herman is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in technical and research commu- nication. Dr. Hermanˆa C™s research interests includeDr. Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angelica Burbano, Universidad Icesi; Ana Judith Ledesma, Universidad Icesi; Dayana Alexandra Ordoñez

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

. [Online]. Available: http://www.cdio.org/node/6306. [Accessed: 2 Mar 2021].[6] I. Torra, I. de Corral, M. Pérez, T. Pagès, E. Valderrama, M. Màrquez, S. Sabaté, P. Solà, C. Hernàndez, A. Sangrà, L. Guàrdia, M. Estebanell, J. Patiño, A. González, M. Fandos, N. Ruiz, M. Iglesias, A. Tena and X. Triadó, "Identificación de competencias docentes que orienten el desarrollo de planes de formación dirigidos a profesorado universitario, " REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, vol. 10(2), pp. 21-56, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6096. [Accessed Dic, 2020][7] H. Leong, M. Nivan and D. Sale, " Enhancing teaching skills: a professional development framework for lecturers," in

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Douglas E. Melton, Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network; Heather Dillon, University of Washington Tacoma; Mark L. Nagurka, Marquette University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

has been incorporated intodecisions about future faculty development offerings, including the format of each workshop. Thisfeedback has driven new innovation, including the fellow awards program that launched in 2020. The2021 workshops new offerings have been developed based on empathy for faculty participants. Thetesting process continues to guide our process and evolve the workshops. The design systems modelreported here promises to revitalize (or reshape) faculty development offerings, ultimately transformingstudent experiences in and outside of the classroom.References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Springer International Publishing, 2017.[2] Stanford, “Stanford d.School

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jazmin Jurkiewicz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Byron Hempel, The University of Arizona; Malori Redman, San Francisco State University; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Christopher Dominguez; Amber Ford

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

considered, themodel described how users accepted a new technology and how users perceived its usefulnessand ease of use [5], [11]. The TAM intends to predict and explain a user’s motivation(s) to acceptnew technology. This motivation is explained by three main factors: perceived ease of use,perceived usefulness, and attitude toward using [5].Figure 1. Technology acceptance model [11]Although there are extensions and modifications that have been made to the TechnologyAcceptance Model, there is reason to believe that the structure and underlying assumptionsremain the same despite the changes and do not affect the interpretations of this study [5].This framework was used to inform the autoethnographic methods used for data collection and toguide

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin; Roxana Maria Carbonell, University of Texas at Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, makerspace, and moment of time; however, there are somestrategies shared that can be permanent changes to ultimately support engineering educator’sgrowth in incorporating prototyping, projects, and makerspaces in their curriculum. Thesefaculty development lessons learned represent the important themes of service, leadership, anddiversity and inclusion for engineering and makerspace faculty and staff. Ultimately, we hopethese lessons learned provides an opportunity for faculty and makerspace staff to shift theirawareness towards the contextual aspects of equity and inclusion (Secules, 2020).ReferencesSecules, S. (2020, October 12). 'Eat Your Veggies' Research: Why I pursue qualitative research for an audience of quantitative-minded engineering

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Jessica Rosenberg; Kathryn Fernández, George Mason University; Julie Shank, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

and ownership of course design and implementation[9]. We also found that trust between faculty resulted in informal coordination [8], particularly inthe assistance provided to members of the community that needed larger levels of support toovercome difficulties in the online teaching environment.References[1] S. Freeman, S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M.P.Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics,” PNAS, vol. 111, pp. 8410-8415, Jun. 2014.[2] A. Kezar and J. Lester, Enhancing Campus Capacity for Leadership: Stories and Lessonsfrom Grassroots Leadership in Higher Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,2011.[3] E. Wenger, Communities of

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Megan Morin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

://engineeringunleashed.com/card (accessed May 24, 2021).[10] S. E. Brownell and K. D. Tanner, “Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity?”, CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 339-346, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-09-016.[11] J. L. Borgford-Parnell, "A pedagogy of larger concerns: Grounding engineering faculty development in research on teaching conceptions," in 2015, DOI: 10.18260/p.23421[12] MURAL. “MURAL” www.mural.com (accessed May 24, 2021).[13] M. Vansteenkiste, W. Lens and E. L. Deci, "Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation," Educational Psychologist, vol

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University; Yutao Zhong, George Mason University; Mark Huntington Snyder, George Mason University; Elizabeth L. White, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

, D.P. French, and S. Sohoni, “Need Assessment for Graduate Teaching Assistant Training: Identifying Important but under-Prepared Roles,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Midwest Section Annual Conference, 2010.

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Timothy A. Wilson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach; Olivia Elizabeth Roa, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

perceived before proceeding. As seen in other studies, the allocation offaculty time remains a key consideration in their perceptions of the change. As academicdepartments make changes, there needs to be conscious effort of how faculty time will be re-allocated and how those efforts will be recognized by the institution. Overall, there will need tobe an understanding among faculty and those involved in the change process about what isvalued and how those goals align with that change.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1920780. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views

Conference Session

Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., E4S, LLC; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Stacy Tantum, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

structurewould provide time for reflection and discussion of each topic or example.Conclusions and future directionsWe shared findings from the perspectives of the host and faculty development team and foundsynergy among the two groups. First, participants felt the need for more time to process the newideas and activities they engaged with throughout the workshop. It is possible participantsexperienced a level of cognitive overload where too many new ideas are engaged at once, or aprevious idea has not been sufficiently processed prior to engaging another new idea. This is acontinual tension in learning. Plan more time for practice and assimilation than you think isneeded. You are the expert(s) and have thought a lot about the content. Remember to make

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Laura Ann Gelles, University of Texas at Dallas; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego; Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

hard or much different. After remote learning she gave us more options for assignments and projects to make it easier on us while keeping the same level of learning.”● “gave us many options on how this class was going to be taught … so most of our time in class was not just a typical lecture setting.”● “effectively used breakout rooms, understand how difficult it is for students during this time, adjusted classes based on our energy level, encourage[d] us to turn our videos on and engage, used Slack as a communication platform, and had us present via zoom.”References[1] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, “Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote