Paper ID #34359Story-Driven Learning: A Pedagogical Approach for Promoting Students’Self-Awareness and Empathy for OthersDr. Kali Lynn Morgan, Georgia Institute of Technology Kali is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. She holds a master’s degree in Student Personnel in Higher Education from the University of Florida and a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction- Higher Education emphasis from the University of South Florida. Her research explores equity in STEM education, student development and learning.Dr. Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia
Paper ID #33210Science Diplomacy: Results From a Three-Year PilotDr. Daniel B. Oerther, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Daniel B. Oerther, PhD, PE joined the faculty of the Missouri University of Science and Tech- nology in 2010 as the John A. and Susan Mathes Chair of Civil Engineering after serving ten years on the faculty of the University of Cincinnati where he was Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Oerther earned his Ph.D. (2002) from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Dan’s professional registrations include: PE, BCEE, BCES, CEng, CEnv, CEHS, and DAAS
. Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Nicholas D. Fila is a research assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Iowa State University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. His current research explores engineering students’ experiences with innovation, empathy across engineering education and engineering design settings, design thinking in the course design process, and novel uses of qualitative research methods in engineering education.Dr. Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State
Paper ID #34034Contextualization as Virtue in Engineering EducationDr. Marie Stettler Kleine, Colorado School of Mines Marie is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Humanitarian Engineering Program in the Department of Engineering, Design, and Society at Colorado School of Mines. She holds a B.S. in mechanical en- gineering and international studies from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and an M.S. and PhD in STS from Virginia Tech. She conducts research on engineering practice and pedagogy around the world, exploring its origins, purposes, and potential futures. Marie’s interest in values and engagement in profes
pedagogical methods to teach core engineering courses and leveraging technology to enhance learning experiences. Nick has a PhD in Engineering Education, BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering, professional engineering experience, and experience as an instructor at the community-college and research-university level.Jennifer L. Taylor, University of Colorado Boulder American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 DEVELOPING ENGINEERING FORMATION SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABILITYAbstractEngineering challenges are increasingly complex, mired in characteristics Horn and Weber havedescribed as the “social mess” – little agreement on
Paper ID #34714Investigating Engineering Culture During COVID-19Jessica R. Deters, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jessica Deters is a PhD candidate at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. She holds a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Statistics and a minor in the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs from the Colorado School of Mines.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on
Paper ID #34487Exploring Values and Norms of Engineering Through Responsible Innova-tionand Critiques of Engineering CulturesDr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster
engineeringeducation. Engineering education’s rigid methodologies and the inflexible “gauntlet” ofengineering curricula are highly structured– but is conformist, highly structured thinkingnecessarily a gateway to complacency in the face of injustice? Could aspects of engineeringeducation make one more comfortable within systems of domination? Or, might the rigidconformist nature of engineering education make it more attractive to those with suchtendencies?Technological development has historically accelerated under authoritarian regimes, including thedesign and implementation of some of the most violent technologies in history. While someacademics have provided full-throated critiques of authoritarianism, academia itself has also longstood to protect white
leverage my skills to deliver innovative solutions for the Future of Education.Mr. Shamsul Arefeen, Texas Tech University Having completed his Masters in Electrical Engineering at Texas Tech University in 2018, Shamsul is working towards a doctoral degree in the same discipline and institution. He completed his bachelors in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from Islamic University of Technology in Dhaka, Bangladesh in 2003. He has extensive work experience in telecommunications and electrical power industry. He takes interest in inter-disciplinary research areas including renewable energy. He taught freshmen engineering courses at Texas Tech University and drew inspiration of working towards continuous
Paper ID #34553Situating Engineering Education in a World Impacted by COVID-19Dr. Thomas A. De Pree, University of New Mexico Thomas A. De Pree is an ASERT-IRACDA postdoctoral fellow in the School of Medicine at University of New Mexico (2020-2023), where he holds a research appointment with the UNM Metal Exposure and Toxicity Assessment on Tribal Lands in the Southwest (METALS) Superfund Research Program Center, and a teaching appointment in environmental sciences at the Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute (SIPI). His Ph.D. & M.S. are in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His research interests include critical pedagogies; efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering, engineering design theory and practice; conceptual change and understanding; and school- to-work transitions for new engineers. His current work explores a range of engineering education design contexts, including the
inengineering education that accounts for similarities and differences from other types ofresponsibility (e.g., social responsibility, professional responsibility). Second, we explore thisconceptual framework empirically by analyzing how engineering students perceive andexperience civic responsibility in the first-year curriculum at a large Mid-Western University inthe United States.BackgroundThe term “responsibility” often implies accountability [8]. Here we briefly discuss the limitationsof focusing on individual responsibility and accountability in engineering ethics. We then arguethat a focus on civic responsibility can address these limitations.Responsibility and individual accountabilityEngineers develop technologies through complex and
Paper ID #33049”The Road Less Travelled”: Engineering With Vulnerable CommunitiesThrough NGOsDr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Undergraduate Programs at the Col- orado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S. Policymaking to Create Sci- entists and Engineers from Sputnik to the ’War Against Terrorism’ (University Press of America, 2005
these items include:“I know the way my mind works when I work through a problem”, “I’m constantly thinkingabout my reasons of doing things”, and “I feel nervous when I speak in front of a group”.The second section, that measures Social-Awareness Indicators as means of public welfarebeliefs and social consciousness, is composed of three subsegments; The first subsegment is composed of three items, and asks the respondents to rate their personal importance of multiple public welfare beliefs. Students are asked to respond to the question: “What, in your opinion, makes a successful engineering career?” by rating “Professional and ethical responsibilities”, “Understanding the consequences of technology”, and
a focus on electro- chemical energy storage systems.Israa Ali, University of Michigan Israa Ali is a senior undergraduate studying Aerospace Engineering.Dr. Corin L Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles Corin (Corey) Bowen is a postdoctoral researcher in the College of Engineering, Computer Science and Technology at California State University - Los Angeles, where she is working on the NSF-funded Eco- STEM project. Her engineering education research focuses on structural oppression in engineering sys- tems, organizing for equitable change, and developing an agenda of Engineering for the Common Good. She conferred her Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor in April
. Avneet Hira is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program at Boston Col- lege. She received her PhD in Engineering Education and MS in Aerospace Engineering from Purdue University, and BE in Aeronautical Engineering from Punjab Engineering College. Her scholarship is motivated by the fundamental question of how engineering and technology can support people in living well in an increasingly engineered world. Her research focuses on affordances of technology, humanis- tic design, and engineering epistemology to promote purpose and connection in engineering education. In her work, she partners with students and educators (middle school to undergraduate), youth and their families, community
Paper ID #32704Engineering Students Coping With COVID-19: Yoga, Meditation, and Men-talHealthDr. Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University Kacey Beddoes is a Project Director in the College of Engineering Dean’s Office at San Jose State University. She holds a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies, and Engineering Education. Dr. Beddoes serves as Associate Editor for the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education and Managing Edi- tor for Engineering Studies. She is also the past Chair of the Working Group on Gender and Diversity
Paper ID #33256Visions of Engineers for the Future: A Comparison of American andChinese Policy Discourses on Engineering Education InnovationMiss Yi Cao, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University CAO Yi is a new PhD student at the Dapartment of engineering education in Virginia Tech with the guidance of Dr. Jennifer Case. She is also a research associate at the International Center for Higher Education Innovation(ICHEI), a UNESCO Category 2 Center situated in Shenzhen, China, on the premise of the Southern University of Science and Technology. With Yi’s a bachelor degree of Standardization of Engineering and
centered on technology and haddisplayed assumptions of technology's benevolence [35, p. 140] in aiding in a natural disaster.In figure 1, we have organized the themes along a spectrum of social to technical and problem tosolution space to show the themes in relation to one another. The rounded shapes depictdimensions that were more in line with the social, while the trapezoid shapes show dimensionsmore in line with the technical.Figure 1. Student response codes along social to technical and problem to solution-focused axes.DiscussionStudents displayed a range of social and technical dimensions offered in their responses to thenatural disaster question. Even though the survey was administered in an engineering course andfollowing two close-ended
Paper ID #33846Engineering Communication and Engineering Criteria 2000: Assessing theImpact Through Papers Presented at the ASEE Annual ConferenceDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Soci- ety Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and received the Sterling Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to engineering education. i She is co-chair (with Judith Norback) of the Com- munication Across
Social, Technical… and Environmental?: Addressing Environmental Entanglements as Part of Engineering EducationAbstractTraining students to be sensitive to the entanglements of technologies and social life has been animportant move for engineering educators interested in advancing generative critiques ofengineering, connecting to student values, and framing new perspectives about what engineeringcan be. However, scholarship in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and EnvironmentalHumanities makes the case that engineering is more than sociotechnical. Environmentalconditions, forces, and agents are critical to consider in relation to technologies, too.In this paper, we suggest that introducing students to engineering as a social, technical
sustainable solid waste systems. Dr. Krones received his PhD in Engineering Systems from MIT in 2016.Dr. Jenna A. Tonn, Boston College Dr. Jenna Tonn is a historian of science, technology, and engineering at Boston College. She received her BA and MA from Stanford University and her PhD from Harvard University. Her research focuses on the social and cultural context of science, technology, and engineering, with a particular interest in gender and science, technology and reproduction, and design justice. At Boston College, Dr. Tonn teaches interdisciplinary courses about the history of technology and engineering.Dr. Russell C. Powell, Boston College Dr. Powell is Visiting Assistant Professor of Environmental Theology and
(formerly Education and Training). She previously has served as chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, and as a member of several other American Society of Civil Engineers’ education-related committees as well as several other Transportation Research Board technical committees. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University.Benjamin Cohen, Lafayette College Benjamin R. Cohen is an associate professor at Lafayette College in Easton, PA. He earned his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies, after earning bachelor degrees in Chemical Engineering and History, from Virginia Tech. He is the author of
Paper ID #34514A Provisional History of the Idea of ”Soft” vs. ”Hard” Skills inEngineering EducationDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering and Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She has served twice as chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE and received that division’s Sterling Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers. American c
. 8By the end of their first semester, students have begun to understand the value of audienceanalysis and how it supports their work, along with learning the purpose of memos andprofessional tone. They take these transferable skills with them to their next class with atechnical writing component.Fundamentals of Engineering Design (Year 1, Second Semester)In Fundamentals of Engineering Design, students work together to research, develop and presenta technology to a potential investor audience. This class starts with a research assignment, amemo to their immediate supervisor describing the potential value of Internet of Things to theirproduct. This assignment builds on research skills and teaches how to summarize and presentinformation for
with the WFU Program for Leadership and Character and many colleagues across the university. With inclusion being a core value, she is proud that the WFU Engineering team represents 60% female engineering faculty and 40% female students, plus 20% of students from ethnic minority groups. Her areas of expertise include engineering identity, complex problem solving across cognitive and non-cognitive domains, recruitment and retention, PBL, engineering design, learning through ser- vice, character education in engineering contexts, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. Prior to joining Wake Forest University, Olga served as a Program Director at the
technology can solve. Once students settle on a technical topic, they work to develop a practical scope anddepth that refines the topic. For example, a student who expresses interest in the problem ofclimate change is encouraged to focus on a sub-issue such as rising sea levels or deforestation. Astudent interested in pursuing new and innovative solutions for amputees is encouraged to focuson lower or upper body amputations, not both. Refinement of the student’s topic enables amanageable scope and a depth that is ideal for a technical talk given to a wide audience. The goals of the topic proposal are for students to clearly communicate a specific societalproblem that can be solved or lessened by an engineering solution, to cite a
Paper ID #33282Exploring the Nexus Between Student’s Perceptions of SociotechnicalThinking and Construction of their Engineering IdentitiesDr. Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State Unviersity Stephanie Claussen is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Univer- sity. She previously spent eight years as a Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Di- vision and the Electrical Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005 and her M.S. and Ph.D. from
Paper ID #34563ABET’s Maverick Evaluators and the Limits of Accreditation as a Mode ofGovernance in Engineering EducationDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional
Paper ID #32377”A New Way of Seeing”: Engagement With Women’s and Gender StudiesFosters Engineering Identity FormationDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Hanson Center for Inclusive STEM Education at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural